Gait training after spinal cord injury: safety, feasibility and gait function following 8 weeks of training with the exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics

Study designProspective quasi-experimental study, pre- and post-design.ObjectivesAssess safety, feasibility, training characteristics and changes in gait function for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the robotic exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics.SettingNine European rehabilitation centres.MethodsRobotic exoskeleton gait training, three times weekly over 8 weeks. Time upright, time walking and steps in the device (training characteristics) were recorded longitudinally. Gait and neurological function were measured by 10 Metre Walk Test (10 MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) II and Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS).ResultsFifty-two participants completed the training protocol. Median age: 35.8 years (IQR 27.5–52.5), men/women: N = 36/16, neurological level of injury: C1-L2 and severity: AIS A–D (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale). Time since injury (TSI) < 1 year, N = 25; > 1 year, N = 27.No serious adverse events occurred. Three participants dropped out following ankle swelling (overuse injury). Four participants sustained a Category II pressure ulcer at contact points with the device but completed the study and skin normalized. Training characteristics increased significantly for all subgroups. The number of participants with TSI < 1 year and gait function increased from 20 to 56% (P = 0.004) and 10MWT, TUG, BBS and LEMS results improved (P < 0.05). The number of participants with TSI > 1 year and gait function, increased from 41 to 44% and TUG and BBS results improved (P < 0.05).ConclusionsExoskeleton training was generally safe and feasible in a heterogeneous sample of persons with SCI. Results indicate potential benefits on gait function and balance.

[1]  G. Borg Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. , 1982, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  R. Waters,et al.  Recovery following complete paraplegia. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  R. Waters,et al.  Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete paraplegia. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  R. Waters,et al.  Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Ers Ross,et al.  The Reciprocating Gait Orthosis: Long-term usage patterns , 1995 .

[6]  I Canale,et al.  The efficiency of walking of paraplegic patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis , 1995, Paraplegia.

[7]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Recovery of ambulation in motor-incomplete tetraplegia. , 1997, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Comparative trials on hybrid walking systems for people with paraplegia: An analysis of study methodology , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  W. Donovan,et al.  International Standards For Neurological Classification Of Spinal Cord Injury , 2003, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[10]  R. Marino,et al.  Metric properties of the ASIA motor score: subscales improve correlation with functional activities. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  V. Dietz,et al.  Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Assessing walking ability in subjects with spinal cord injury: validity and reliability of 3 walking tests. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[13]  教育講演 脊髄損傷患者の機能予後 Outcome measures in spinal cord injury (SCI): use in prognosis and clinical trials (第44回 日本リハビリテーション医学会学術集会 プログラム・抄録集) , 2007 .

[14]  M. Nash,et al.  The relationship between perceived exertion and physiologic indicators of stress during graded arm exercise in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  I Gelernter,et al.  The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III: Reliability and validity in a multi-center international study , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation.

[16]  Chester H Ho,et al.  Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  J J Eng,et al.  A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[18]  J. Ditunno,et al.  Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study , 2008, Spinal Cord.

[19]  A. Hosman,et al.  Who wants to walk? Preferences for recovery after SCI: a longitudinal and cross-sectional study. , 2008 .

[20]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  Outcome Measures for Gait and Ambulation in the Spinal Cord Injury Population , 2008, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[21]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Standing balance assessment in ASIA D paraplegic and tetraplegic participants: concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale , 2010, Spinal Cord.

[22]  M. Wirz,et al.  Falls in Persons With Spinal Cord Injury: Validity and Reliability of the Berg Balance Scale , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[23]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[24]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Safety and tolerance of the ReWalk™ exoskeleton suit for ambulation by people with complete spinal cord injury: A pilot study , 2012, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[25]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  The ReWalk Powered Exoskeleton to Restore Ambulatory Function to Individuals with Thoracic-Level Motor-Complete Spinal Cord Injury , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[26]  S. Amatachaya,et al.  Reliability and validity of three functional tests in ambulatory patients with spinal cord injury , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[27]  S. Kolakowsky-Hayner,et al.  Safety and Feasibility of using the EksoTM Bionic Exoskeleton to Aid Ambulation after Spinal Cord Injury , 2013 .

[28]  Rob den Otter,et al.  The Combined Effects of Body Weight Support and Gait Speed on Gait Related Muscle Activity: A Comparison between Walking in the Lokomat Exoskeleton and Regular Treadmill Walking , 2014, PloS one.

[29]  P. Schwenkreis,et al.  Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[30]  Katie Gant,et al.  Understanding therapeutic benefits of overground bionic ambulation: exploratory case series in persons with chronic, complete spinal cord injury. , 2014, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Nerys Brick,et al.  Locomotor training for walking after spinal cord injury. , 2014, Orthopedic nursing.

[32]  Marcel P Dijkers,et al.  Time and Effort Required by Persons with Spinal Cord Injury to Learn to Use a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking. , 2015, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[33]  A. Bauman,et al.  All-cause mortality effects of replacing sedentary time with physical activity and sleeping using an isotemporal substitution model: a prospective study of 201,129 mid-aged and older adults , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[34]  J. Fawcett,et al.  Challenges for defining minimal clinically important difference (MCID) after spinal cord injury , 2014, Spinal Cord.

[35]  Francesco Piccione,et al.  Effects on mobility training and de-adaptations in subjects with Spinal Cord Injury due to a Wearable Robot: a preliminary report , 2016, BMC Neurology.

[36]  L. Miller,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and safety of powered exoskeleton-assisted walking in patients with spinal cord injury: systematic review with meta-analysis , 2016, Medical devices.

[37]  J. V. van Middendorp,et al.  Lower-limb exoskeletons for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury: findings from a feasibility study , 2016, Clinical rehabilitation.