Offline Motion Simulation Framework: Optimizing Motion Simulator Trajectories and Parameters

This paper presents a method to simultaneously compute optimal simulator motions and simulator parameters for a predefined set of vehicle motions. The optimization can be performed with a model of human motion perception or sensory dynamics taken into account. The simulator dynamics, sensory dynamics, and optimality criterion are provided by the user. The dynamical models are defined by implicit index-1 differential-algebraic equations (DAE). The direct collocation method is used to find the numerical solution of the optimization problem. The possible applications of the method include calculating optimal simulator motion for scenarios when the future motion is perfectly known (e.g., comfort studies with autonomous vehicles), optimizing simulator design, and evaluating the maximum possible cueing fidelity for a given simulator. To demonstrate the method, we calculated optimal trajectories for a set of typical car maneuvers for the CyberMotion Simulator at the Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics. We also optimize the configurable cabin position of the simulator and assess the corresponding motion fidelity improvement. The software implementation of the method is publicly available. © 2019 Elsevier Ltd

[1]  Alessandro Beghi,et al.  A real-time, MPC-based Motion Cueing Algorithm with Look-Ahead and driver characterization , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[2]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Real-Time Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Motion Simulator Based on a 8-DOF Serial Robot , 2018, 2018 European Control Conference (ECC).

[3]  M. Chacron,et al.  Statistics of the Vestibular Input Experienced during Natural Self-Motion: Implications for Neural Processing , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Jörg Fischer,et al.  Nonlinear Model Predictive Control of a Cable-Robot-Based Motion Simulator , 2017 .

[5]  Michael Blum,et al.  Design of a Hexapod Motion Cueing System for the NASA Ames Vertical Motion Simulator , 2002 .

[6]  Lloyd D. Reid,et al.  Motion Washout Filter Tuning: Rules and Requirements , 1997 .

[7]  Carlo Masone,et al.  Mechanical design and control of the new 7-DOF CyberMotion simulator , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  William H. Warren,et al.  Chapter 8 – Self-Motion: Visual Perception and Visual Control , 1995 .

[9]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming , 2006, Math. Program..

[10]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  The MPI CyberMotion Simulator: A Novel Research Platform to Investigate Human Control Behavior , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..

[11]  Joost Venrooij,et al.  Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing algorithms for driving simulation , 2017, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[12]  Mark Wentink,et al.  An innovative optimal control approach for the next generation simulator motion platform DESDEMONA , 2007 .

[13]  Joel Andersson,et al.  A General-Purpose Software Framework for Dynamic Optimization (Een algemene softwareomgeving voor dynamische optimalisatie) , 2013 .

[14]  Joost Venrooij,et al.  Defining the Kinematic Requirements for a Theoretical Driving Simulator , 2017 .