Depth of field affects perceived depth-width ratios in photographs of natural scenes.

The aim of the study was to find out how much influence depth of field has on the perceived ratio of depth and width in photographs of natural scenes. Depth of field is roughly defined as the distance range that is perceived as sharp in the photograph. Four different semi-natural scenes consisting of a central and two flanking figurines were used. For each scene, five series of photos were made, in which the distance in depth between the central figurine and the flanking figurines increased. These series of photographs had different amounts of depth of field. In the first experiment participants adjusted the position of the two flanking figurines relative to a central figurine, until the perceived distance in the depth dimension equaled the perceived lateral distance between the two flanking figurines. Viewing condition was either monocular or binocular (non-stereo). In the second experiment, the participants did the same task but this time we varied the viewing distance. We found that the participants' depth/width settings increased with increasing depth of field. As depth of field increased, the perceived depth in the scene was reduced relative to the perceived width. Perceived depth was reduced relative to perceived width under binocular viewing conditions compared to monocular viewing conditions. There was a greater reduction when the viewing distance was increased. As photographs of natural scenes contain many highly redundant or conflicting depth cues, we conclude therefore that local image blur is an important cue to depth. Moreover, local image blur is not only taken into account in the perception of egocentric distances, but also affects the perception of depth within the scene relative to lateral distances within the scene.

[1]  F. Campbell,et al.  A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  K N OGLE,et al.  Depth of focus of the human eye. , 1959, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[3]  G Westheimer,et al.  Pupil size and visual resolution. , 1964, Vision research.

[4]  W N Charman,et al.  THE DEPTH‐OF‐FOCUS OF THE HUMAN EYE FOR SNELLEN LETTERS* , 1975, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[5]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and the Depth-of-field of the Human Eye as Measured by Laser Speckle , 1977 .

[6]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Geometric Transformations of Pictured Space , 1978, Perception.

[7]  R. R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture perception: An analysis of visual compensation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. Watt,et al.  The recognition and representation of edge blur: Evidence for spatial primitives in human vision , 1983, Vision Research.

[9]  Depth of Focus and Accommodation for Sinusoidal Gratings as a Function of Luminance , 1986, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[10]  Alex Pentland,et al.  A New Sense for Depth of Field , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  George Mather,et al.  Image blur as a pictorial depth cue , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  G. Mather The Use of Image Blur as a Depth Cue , 1997, Perception.

[13]  Susana Marcos,et al.  The depth-of-field of the human eye from objective and subjective measurements , 1999, Vision Research.

[14]  Nobuyuki Hiruma,et al.  Characteristics of accommodation toward apparent depth , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  J R Tresilian,et al.  Ordinal depth information from accommodation? , 2000, Ergonomics.

[16]  George Mather,et al.  Depth cue integration: stereopsis and image blur , 2000, Vision Research.

[17]  G. Mather,et al.  Blur Discrimination and its Relation to Blur-Mediated Depth Perception , 2002, Perception.

[18]  Bin Wang,et al.  Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery , 2003, Vision Research.

[19]  Astrid M L Kappers,et al.  Pointing out of the Picture , 2004, Perception.

[20]  M. Ernst,et al.  Focus cues affect perceived depth. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[21]  Bin Wang,et al.  Central and near peripheral retinal contributions to the depth-of-focus using naturalistic stimulation , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  Bin Wang,et al.  Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery , 2006, Vision Research.

[23]  Jeffrey A. Saunders,et al.  The accuracy and reliability of perceived depth from linear perspective as a function of image size , 2006 .

[24]  Erik Blaser,et al.  Retinal blur and the perception of egocentric distance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  James F. O'Brien,et al.  Using blur to affect perceived distance and size , 2010, TOGS.

[26]  Huib de Ridder,et al.  Depth in box spaces. , 2012, Seeing and perceiving.