Remote video management for intraoperative consultation and surgical telepresence.

Telemedicine applications can connect surgeons from one operating room (OR) to a distant consultant. The additional capacity of telepresence provides remote consultants the ability to control their own view of the surgical field using robotic management of a network camera. The goal of this study was to compare access to surgical field by robotic camera versus image controlled by the surgeon using a camera mounted to the table. A Stryker laparoscopic camera was attached to the OR table using a Mediflex arm, and video image was transmitted with a Polycom Transfer Control Protocol (TCP)/Internet Protocol (IP) connection. A network Sony camera was mounted on a tripod, connected over the Internet using a parallel TCP/IP connection. A Web interface allowed control of the camera angle and zoom. In 22 consultations effective bandwidth was 800 Kbps for the network camera and 1024 Kbps for the Stryker camera. The operation was thyroidectomy and the consultant was either in Moscow, Russia, or Bucharest, Romania. The quality of the image in both methods was indiscernible. The ability to identify critical surgical anatomy was also indiscernible. No transmission session failed or had an interruption. The robotic camera can be a powerful tool for surgical collaboration.

[1]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Telesurgery, telementoring, virtual surgery, and telerobotics , 2003, Current urology reports.

[2]  A. Seifalian,et al.  Telemedicine in surgery , 2003 .

[3]  H Feussner,et al.  An evaluation of a surgical telepresence system for an intrahospital local area network , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[4]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  A novel telemedicine method for viewing the open surgical field. , 2002, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[5]  C R Doarn,et al.  Impact of varying transmission bandwidth on image quality. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[6]  Jacques Marescaux,et al.  Primer of Robotic and Telerobotic Surgery , 2004 .

[7]  Charles R Doarn,et al.  Digital Video Capture and Synchronous Consultation in Open Surgery , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[8]  Dan Stoianovici,et al.  Is telesurgery a new reality? Our experience with laparoscopic and percutaneous procedures. , 2003 .

[9]  G. Ballantyne Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  James C. Rosser,et al.  Telementoring and Teleproctoring , 2001, World Journal of Surgery.

[11]  Laparoscopic telescope with alpha port and aesop to view open surgical procedures. , 2001, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[12]  B M Harnett,et al.  Real-Time Internet Connections: Implications for Surgical Decision Making in Laparoscopy , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[13]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  The telecommunication revolution in the medical field: present applications and future perspective. , 2003, Current surgery.