Network attributes underlying intellectual giftedness in the developing brain

Brain network is organized to maximize the efficiency of both segregated and integrated information processing that may be related to human intelligence. However, there have been surprisingly few studies that focus on the topological characteristics of brain network underlying extremely high intelligence that is intellectual giftedness, particularly in adolescents. Here, we examined the network topology in 25 adolescents with superior intelligence (SI-Adol), 25 adolescents with average intelligence (AI-Adol), and 27 young adults with AI (AI-Adult). We found that SI-Adol had network topological properties of high global efficiency as well as high clustering with a low wiring cost, relative to AI-Adol. However, contrary to the suggested role that brain hub regions play in general intelligence, the network efficiency of rich club connection matrix, which represents connections among brain hubs, was low in SI-Adol in comparison to AI-Adol. Rather, a higher level of local connection density was observed in SI-Adol than in AI-Adol. The highly intelligent brain may not follow this efficient yet somewhat stereotypical process of information integration entirely. Taken together, our results suggest that a highly intelligent brain may communicate more extensively, while being less dependent on rich club communications during adolescence.

[1]  Yong He,et al.  Discrete Neuroanatomical Networks Are Associated with Specific Cognitive Abilities in Old Age , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Changeux,et al.  Experimental and Theoretical Approaches to Conscious Processing , 2011, Neuron.

[3]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Ben D. Fulcher,et al.  Developmental Changes in Brain Network Hub Connectivity in Late Adolescence , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Xiaoqi Huang,et al.  Disrupted Brain Connectivity Networks in Drug-Naive, First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  Jun Li,et al.  Brain spontaneous functional connectivity and intelligence , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  Yong He,et al.  BrainNet Viewer: A Network Visualization Tool for Human Brain Connectomics , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber tracking: principles and strategies – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  Tina M. Newman Assessment of Giftedness in School-Age Children Using Measures of Intelligence or Cognitive Abilities , 2008 .

[10]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[11]  Michael A. McDaniel Big-brained people are smarter: A meta-analysis of the relationship between in vivo brain volume and intelligence , 2005 .

[12]  P. V. van Zijl,et al.  Three‐dimensional tracking of axonal projections in the brain by magnetic resonance imaging , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[13]  A. Dietrich,et al.  A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  James A. Holdnack,et al.  WISC-IV Advanced Clinical Interpretation , 2006 .

[15]  R. Jung,et al.  The structure of creative cognition in the human brain , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Armin Scheurich,et al.  Association of Structural Global Brain Network Properties with Intelligence in Normal Aging , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  R. Haier,et al.  The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: Converging neuroimaging evidence , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[20]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  A positive-negative mode of population covariation links brain connectivity, demographics and behavior , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  B. Baars The conscious access hypothesis: origins and recent evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Global Connectivity of Prefrontal Cortex Predicts Cognitive Control and Intelligence , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  Arnold B. Scheibel,et al.  On the brain of a scientist: Albert Einstein , 1985, Experimental Neurology.

[25]  David M. Schwartz,et al.  Advanced Clinical Interpretation of WISC-IV Index Scores , 2006 .

[26]  Weibo Chen,et al.  The corpus callosum of Albert Einstein's brain: another clue to his high intelligence? , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[28]  Manuel Desco,et al.  Mathematically gifted adolescents use more extensive and more bilateral areas of the fronto-parietal network than controls during executive functioning and fluid reasoning tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[29]  O. Sporns,et al.  High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Geraint A. Wiggins,et al.  Mind the gap: an attempt to bridge computational and neuroscientific approaches to study creativity , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[31]  P. Thompson,et al.  Neurobiology of intelligence: science and ethics , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  S. S. Young,et al.  Resampling-Based Multiple Testing: Examples and Methods for p-Value Adjustment , 1993 .

[33]  Christian Montag,et al.  Serotonin and the Brain's Rich Club—Association Between Molecular Genetic Variation on the TPH2 Gene and the Structural Connectome , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Kun Ho Lee,et al.  Neural correlates of superior intelligence: Stronger recruitment of posterior parietal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[35]  Stefan C. Dombrowski,et al.  The Neurobiological Foundations of Giftedness , 2010 .

[36]  S. F. Witelson,et al.  The exceptional brain of Albert Einstein , 1999, The Lancet.

[37]  Lara M. Wierenga,et al.  The development of brain network architecture , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Jun Li,et al.  Brain Anatomical Network and Intelligence , 2009, NeuroImage.

[39]  In Kyoon Lyoo,et al.  Effects of Creatine Monohydrate Augmentation on Brain Metabolic and Network Outcome Measures in Women With Major Depressive Disorder , 2016, Biological Psychiatry.

[40]  L. Gottfredson Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history, and bibliography , 1997 .

[41]  O. Sporns,et al.  Network hubs in the human brain , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  R. Kahn,et al.  Efficiency of Functional Brain Networks and Intellectual Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  R. Haier,et al.  Human intelligence and brain networks , 2010, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.

[45]  Philip Shaw,et al.  Intelligence and the developing human brain , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[46]  Adrian M. Owen,et al.  Fractionating Human Intelligence , 2012, Neuron.

[47]  I. Deary,et al.  The neuroscience of human intelligence differences , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Children's intellectual ability is associated with structural network integrity , 2016, NeuroImage.

[49]  S. Rossi,et al.  Efficiency of weak brain connections support general cognitive functioning , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Intelligence , 1836, The Medico-chirurgical review.

[51]  Adrianne Noe,et al.  The cerebral cortex of Albert Einstein: a description and preliminary analysis of unpublished photographs , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  B. Efron The jackknife, the bootstrap, and other resampling plans , 1987 .

[53]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network attributes for segregation and integration in the human brain , 2013, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.