Enclosure, Common Right and the Property of the Poor

Although considerable research has been conducted into the dynamics of commons in rural settings, we still know very little about common property within cities. Given the hegemony of certain models of property, the urban commons has been overlooked and ignored. Urban commons do not look like property to us. This can lead, I argue, to real injustice. Based, in part, on empirical research in Vancouver, I attempt to map out the urban commons of the poor, particularly in relation to the dynamics of inner-city gentrification. This commons, produced through intensive patterns of use and collective habitation, is fiercely moral, reliant upon political claims and the exclusion of interests that threaten enclosure. For inner-city activists contesting displacement, the commons is real. As such, gentrification, and related dynamics, can usefully be thought of as forms of enclosure, or what David Harvey terms `dispossession by accumulation'. I conclude by asking what urban policy, political praxis and property theory might look like if they acknowledged the collective property interest of the poor in the inner-city commons.

[1]  J. Gibson‐Graham SURPLUS POSSIBILITIES: POSTDEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY ECONOMIES , 2005 .

[2]  N. Blomley Mud for the Land , 2002 .

[3]  N. Smith New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy , 2002 .

[4]  G. Brady Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action , 1993 .

[5]  Amnon Lehavi Property Rights and Local Public Goods: Toward a Better Future for Urban Communities , 2005 .

[6]  S. Jentoft,et al.  Market or Community Failure? Critical Perspectives on Common Property Research , 1998 .

[7]  R. Nelson Collective private ownership of American housing:a social revolution in local governance , 2000 .

[8]  H. Sklar,et al.  Streets of Hope: The Fall and Rise of an Urban Neighborhood , 1999 .

[9]  Omar M. Razzaz Examining Property Rights and Investment in Informal Settlements: The Case of Jordan , 1993 .

[10]  Craig Johnson,et al.  Uncommon Ground: The ‘Poverty of History’ in Common Property Discourse , 2004 .

[11]  Joseph L. Sax,et al.  The Public Trust Doctrine in Natural Resource Law : Effective Judicial Intervention , 1970 .

[12]  D. Harvey The New Imperialism , 2003, Power and Inequality.

[13]  Donald A. Krueckeberg The Difficult Character of Property: To Whom Do Things Belong? , 1995 .

[14]  Carol M. Rose The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems , 1998 .

[15]  Janet C. Sturgeon Border Landscapes: The Politics of Akha Land Use in China and Thailand , 2005 .

[16]  D. Feeny,et al.  The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-two years later , 1990, Human ecology.

[17]  E. Ostrom,et al.  The Drama of the Commons , 2002 .

[18]  J. M. Neeson Commoners: common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820: Commoners , 1993 .

[19]  J. Mccarthy Commons as counterhegemonic projects , 2005 .

[20]  G. Domhoff Unmaking Goliath: Community Control in the Face of Global Capital , 2005 .

[21]  T. Allen The Right to Property in Commonwealth Constitutions: The meaning of property , 2000 .

[22]  J. K. Gibson-Graham,et al.  The End of Capitalism (as we knew it): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy , 1996 .

[23]  B. Jessop Liberalism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Governance: A State‐Theoretical Perspective , 2002 .

[24]  Carol M. Rose,et al.  Carol M. Rose, Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership , Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1994. Pp. ix + 317. $65.00 cloth; $24.50 paper (ISBN 0-8133-8544-7; ISBN 0-8133-8555-5). , 1998, Law and History Review.

[25]  Michael Hardt,et al.  Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire , 2004 .

[26]  Robert Neuwirth,et al.  Shadow cities : a billion squatters, a new urban world , 2005 .

[27]  C. Mouffe,et al.  Hegemony and Socialist Strategy , 1985 .

[28]  N. Peluso Seeing property in land use: Local territorializations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia , 2005 .

[29]  T. Bethell The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity Through the Ages , 1998 .

[30]  James Boyle,et al.  The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain , 2003 .

[31]  G. Mann Class Consciousness and Common Property: The International Fishermen and Allied Workers of America , 2002, International Labor and Working-Class History.

[32]  E. Blakely,et al.  Fortress America: Gated Communities in the United States , 1997 .

[33]  N. Blomley Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property , 2003 .

[34]  Jeremy Waldron,et al.  The Right to Private Property. , 1988 .

[35]  Donald N. McCloskey,et al.  Commoners: common right, enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820: Introduction , 1993 .

[36]  Joseph William Singer,et al.  The Reliance Interest in Property , 1988 .

[37]  J. Dennis Chasse Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property , 2001 .

[38]  N. Blomley Landscapes of Property , 1998 .

[39]  B. Donahue,et al.  Reclaiming the Commons: Community Farms and Forests in a New England Town , 1999 .

[40]  Philip Selznick 'Law in Context' Revisited , 2003 .

[41]  W. Magnusson Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space , 2005, Perspectives on Politics.

[42]  P. Booth From property rights to public control: The quest for public interest in the control of urban development , 2002 .

[43]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. , 1999, Science.

[44]  David Sauri-Pujol,et al.  Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy , 1992 .

[45]  N. Blomley Un‐real Estate: Proprietary Space and Public Gardening , 2004 .

[46]  Theodore Steinberg,et al.  Slide Mountain, or the Folly of Owning Nature by Theodore Steinberg (review) , 1996, Technology and Culture.