The entire network is doing paradigm shift towards the software-defined networks by separating forwarding plane from control plane. This gives a clear call to researchers for joining the ocean of software-defined networks for doing research considering its security aspects. The biggest advantage of SDN is programmability of the forwarding plane. By making the switches programmable, it can take live instructions from controllers. The versions of OpenFlow protocol and the compatibility of programmable switches with OpenFlow were the stepping stone making software-defined networks thrashed towards reality. The control plane has come up with multiple options of controllers such as NOX [2], Ryu [3], Floodlight [4], OpenDayLight [6], ONOS [7] and the list is big. The major players are Java based which keeps the doors open for enhancement of features by the contributors. However, more is expected from the practicality of P4Lang programmed switches by bringing skilled people to the industry who can actually implement programmable switches with ease. The obvious reason for delayed progress in the area of software-defined networks is the lack of awareness towards data visualization options existing as of now. The purpose of writing this chapter is to throw light upon the existing options available for data visualization in the area of SDN especially addressing the security aspect by analyzing the experiment of distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on SDN with clarity on its usage, features, applicability and scopes for its adaptabilities in the world of networks which is going towards SDN. This chapter is a call to network researchers to join the train of SDN and push forward the SDN technology by proved results of data visualization of network and security matrices. The sections and subsections show clearly the experimental steps to implement DDoS attack on SDN and further provide solution to overcome the attack.
[1]
Bhargavi Goswami,et al.
Scalability of software defined network on floodlight controller using OFNet
,
2017,
2017 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer, and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT).
[2]
Bhargavi Goswami,et al.
Experimenting with scalability of floodlight controller in software defined networks
,
2017,
2017 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, Communication, Computer, and Optimization Techniques (ICEECCOT).
[3]
Wang-Cheol Song,et al.
Network-wide traffic visibility in OF@TEIN SDN testbed using sFlow
,
2014,
The 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium.
[4]
Chanpol Visitsathapong.
Path Switching Delay Measurements in Software-Defined Networks
,
2014
.
[5]
Tony Manuel,et al.
Experimenting with scalability of Beacon controller in software defined network
,
2019
.
[6]
Bhargavi Goswami,et al.
Ryu controller's scalability experiment on software defined networks
,
2018,
2018 IEEE International Conference on Current Trends in Advanced Computing (ICCTAC).
[7]
Bhargavi Goswami,et al.
Experimenting with ONOS Scalability on Software Defined Network
,
2018
.
[8]
Bhargavi Goswami,et al.
Enhancement of LAN infrastructure performance for data center in presence of network security
,
2018
.
[9]
Abe Fettig,et al.
Twisted Network Programming Essentials
,
2005
.
[10]
Ailton Akira Shinoda,et al.
Using Mininet for emulation and prototyping Software-Defined Networks
,
2014,
2014 IEEE Colombian Conference on Communications and Computing (COLCOM).