Luminescence dosimetry in a contaminated settlement of the Techa River valley, Southern Urals, Russia

Abstract Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry is applied to quartz extracted from bricks from a mill in a contaminated village (Muslyumovo) of the Techa River valley, Southern Urals, Russia, for the purpose of dose reconstruction. Previous works [ Goksu et al., 2002 . First international intercomparison of luminescence techniques using samples from the Techa river valley. Health Phys. 82, 94–101] have shown that the expected dose due to man-made sources of radiation in the bricks is in the same range as the background dose due to natural sources of radiation, therefore a precise estimate of the cumulative and background dose is of utmost importance. Cumulative doses could be assessed with OSL with a precision of around 4% and lie between 450 and 600 mGy. The background dose was carefully determined by a combination of laboratory measurements, in-situ gamma spectrometry and Monte Carlo modelling. The results show that the gamma-dose rate of the soil was overestimated and the fractional brick gamma-dose rate underestimated in previous studies, but that the overall gamma-dose rate was nearly correct, due to mutual compensation. The obtained anthropogenic doses in brick measured with OSL lie between 200 and 300 mGy, show variability between adjacent bricks within error limits for one spot but a significant difference for two samples is observed for another spot. A distinct dependency of measured dose upon sample height is observed, which is an indication of a source distribution, which extends over a large area and up to a certain depth into the soil and in which higher contaminated areas are located at a greater distance to the mill than lower contaminated areas. A measured dose–depth profile is compared with previously published Monte Carlo calculations to verify the source energy.

[1]  I. Bailiff,et al.  Luminescence dosimetry using building materials and personal objects. , 2006, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[2]  V. Correcher,et al.  COMPARISON OF RETROSPECTIVE LUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY WITH COMPUTATIONAL MODELING IN TWO HIGHLY CONTAMINATED SETTLEMENTS DOWNWIND OF THE CHERNOBYL NPP , 2004, Health physics.

[3]  A. Murray,et al.  The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability , 2003 .

[4]  W. Wahl,et al.  Beta Dosimetry Using Thin Layer a-Al2O3:C TL Detectors , 1999 .

[5]  H. Jungner,et al.  Intercomparison of luminescence measurements of bricks from Dolon' village: experimental methodology and results of European Study Group. , 2006, Journal of radiation research.

[6]  N. G. Bougrov,et al.  Issues in the reconstruction of environmental doses on the basis of thermoluminescence measurements in the Techa riverside. , 1998, Health Physics.

[7]  M. Goldman Retrospective Assessment of Exposures to Ionizing Radiation , 2004 .

[8]  V. Correcher,et al.  Absorbed dose evaluations in retrospective dosimetry : methodological developments using quartz , 2000 .

[9]  B A Napier,et al.  DOSE RECONSTRUCTION SYSTEM FOR THE EXPOSED POPULATION LIVING ALONG THE TECHA RIVER , 2000, Health physics.

[10]  C. Woda,et al.  Potential and limitations of the 210 °C TL peak in quartz for retrospective dosimetry , 2011 .

[11]  A. Murray,et al.  Optically stimulated luminescence dating of a Danish Eemian coastal marine deposit: a test of accuracy , 2003 .

[12]  A. Murray,et al.  PRECISION AND ACCURACY IN THE OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE DATING OF SEDIMENTARY QUARTZ: A STATUS REVIEW , 2002 .

[13]  Norbert Mercier,et al.  Dose-rate conversion factors: update , 2011 .

[14]  L. Bøtter-Jensen,et al.  FIRST INTERNATIONAL INTERCOMPARISON OF LUMINESCENCE TECHNIQUES USING SAMPLES FROM THE TECHA RIVER VALLEY , 2002, Health physics.

[15]  J. Prescott,et al.  Cosmic ray and gamma ray dosimetry for TL and ESR , 1988 .

[16]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  Verification of external exposure assessment for the upper Techa riverside by luminescence measurements and Monte Carlo photon transport modeling , 2003 .

[17]  J. Prescott,et al.  Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: Large depths and long-term time variations , 1994 .

[18]  A F Tsyb,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF RETROSPECTIVE LUMINESCENCE DOSIMETRY IN AREAS AFFECTED BY FALLOUT FROM THE SEMIPALATINSK NUCLEAR TEST SITE: AN EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL , 2004, Health physics.

[19]  M. I. Vorobiova,et al.  On an evaluation of external dose values in the Techa River Dosimetry System (TRDS) 2000 , 2003, Radiation and environmental biophysics.