Cost-effectiveness of managing Natura 2000 sites: an exploratory study for Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Poland

Natura 2000 sites are expected to assure the long-term survival of Europe’s most valuable and threatened species and habitats. It follows that successful management of the sites is of great importance. Next to goal attainment, cost-effectiveness is increasingly recognised as a key requirement for gaining social and political acceptance for costly conservation measures. We identify and qualitatively examine issues of cost-effectiveness related to the design and implementation of management measures in Natura 2000 sites in Finland, Germany, the Netherlands and Poland. Given the wide variety of management design and implementation options within the four countries, our study is purely of an exploratory nature. We derive recommendations for improving the cost-effectiveness of management in Natura 2000 sites and for future research. Examples of policy recommendations include guaranteeing the availability of funds for longer periods, and ensuring the appropriate allocation of funds between the different tasks of designing and implementing management plans. Further research should examine the cost-effectiveness of controversial suggestions such as, for example, more tailored payment schemes for conservation measures that result in higher ecological outputs but are costly to administer. Moreover, more research is needed to better understand how rules for administrations, as well as rules and governance structures for tasks within administrations, should be designed.

[1]  M. Drechsler.  Probabilistic approaches to scheduling reserve selection , 2005 .

[2]  J. Hiedanpää.  European-wide conservation versus local well-being: the reception of the Natura 2000 Reserve Network in Karvia, SW-Finland , 2002 .

[3]  J. Newig,et al.  Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level - and effective? , 2009 .

[4]  Andreas Witzel,et al.  Das problemzentrierte Interview , 1985 .

[5]  Martin Welp,et al.  Stakeholder Dialogues in Natural Resources Management , 2006 .

[6]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures , 2002 .

[7]  Thomas R. Lindlof.  Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[8]  E. Ostrom.  Understanding Institutional Diversity , 2005 .

[9]  Brian E. Roe,et al.  Optimal design of pro-conservation incentives , 2009 .

[10]  J. Isselstein,et al.  Rewarding farmers for delivering vascular plant diversity in managed grasslands: A transdisciplinary case-study approach , 2008 .

[11]  Melanie Eben.  Public Participation during Site Selections for Natura 2000 in Germany: The Bavarian Case , 2006 .

[12]  Martin Drechsler,et al.  A model-based approach for designing cost-effective compensation payments for conservation of endangered species in real landscapes , 2007 .

[13]  T. Chmielewski.  Landscape and Protected Areas — Polish Experiences , 2008 .

[14]  H. Wittmer,et al.  On the ‘Efficient Boundaries of the State’: The Contribution of Transaction-Costs Economics to the Analysis of Decentralization and Devolution in Natural Resource Management , 2004 .

[15]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Replacement cost: A practical measure of site value for cost-effective reserve planning , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Schmidt,et al.  Standards and thresholds for impact assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Wang Li,et al.  On environment protection , 2001 .

[18]  K. Hagedorn,et al.  Environmental co-operation and institutional change : theories and policies for European agriculture , 2002 .

[19]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Money for Nothing? A Call for Empirical Evaluation of Biodiversity Conservation Investments , 2006, PLoS biology.

[20]  David Kleijn,et al.  Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes , 2001, Nature.

[21]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[22]  M. Whitby,et al.  Estimating the Supply of Conservation Goods in Britain: A Comparison of the Financial Efficiency of Two Policy Instruments , 1996 .

[23]  C. Ohl,et al.  Designing Cost‐Effective Payments for Conservation Measures to Generate Spatiotemporal Habitat Heterogeneity , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale , 2007 .

[25]  D. Capistrano,et al.  Ecosystems and human well-being: multiscale assessments: findings of the Sub-global Assessments Working Group of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[26]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy , 2005 .

[27]  A. Gouldson,et al.  Interplay of actors, scales, frameworks and regimes in the governance of biodiversity , 2009 .

[28]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Promoting Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Economic Analysis of New Approaches in Germany , 2009 .

[29]  Edwin Buitelaar,et al.  A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process , 2004 .