Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus)

Only a limited number of species have been found capable of generalized matching-to-sample (MTS) after exposure to relatively few training exemplars. We trained a juvenile, experimentally naive California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) in MTS, using a pair of three-dimensional objects as samples. Successful matching to a criterion of 90% correct or better over 2 successive sessions was attained in 12 sessions (269 trials and 70 errors). Two subsequent “partial” transfer tests, in which each of the two training objects was paired with a novel test object, and four additional transfer tests, all with novel objects, were presented following training. An 80% performance criterion over 2 successive sessions was reached, or closely approximated, in from 2 to 4 transfer sessions for all transfer tests; errors to criterion tended to be reduced across the successive novel transfer tests and were as few as five during the final two tests; and performance on the first 48 trials of the last two novel transfers was not significantly different from a near-ceiling level baseline performance measure. Neophobic responses of the sea lion to new objects precluded an unbiased evaluation of immediate (Trial 1) transfer. The sea lion’s short-term memory for sample objects was also measured. Matching performance was maintained at a level of 78% correct responses or better for delays through to 45 sec after removal of the sample object. At a 58-sec delay, the longest tested, performance declined to 69% correct responses. These retention levels are only somewhat below levels reported for dolphins and nonhuman primates tested on visual delayed MTS, but they are above levels typically reported for pigeon subjects.

[1]  L Smith,et al.  Delayed discrimination and delayed matching in pigeons. , 1967, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  Gary L. Bradshaw,et al.  Generalization of Visual Matching by a Bottlenosed Dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): Evidence for Invariance of Cognitive Performance with Visual and Auditory Materials , 1989 .

[3]  M. Colombo,et al.  Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella) , 1985 .

[4]  L. Herman,et al.  Comprehension of sentences by bottlenosed dolphins , 1984, Cognition.

[5]  L. Jarrard,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Short-Term Memory in the Monkey1 , 1971 .

[6]  W. J. Jackson,et al.  Comparison of intra- vs extradimensional transfer of matching by rhesus monkeys , 1970 .

[7]  Ronald J. Schusterman,et al.  Artificial language comprehension and size transposition by a California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) , 1986 .

[8]  John E. Overall,et al.  Calculation of Adjusted Response Frequencies Using Least Squares Regression Methods , 1980 .

[9]  Ronald J. Schusterman,et al.  California Sea Lions Are Capable of Semantic Comprehension , 1984 .

[10]  Anthony A. Wright,et al.  Auditorysame/different concept learning by monkeys , 1990 .

[11]  L. Herman Interference and auditory short-term memory in the bottlenosed dolphin , 1975 .

[12]  L M Herman,et al.  Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  M R D'Amato,et al.  Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[14]  N. Mello Alcohol effects on delayed matching to sample performance by rhesus monkey. , 1971, Physiology & behavior.

[15]  H. Harlow,et al.  The formation of learning sets. , 1949, Psychological review.

[16]  Jacquelyne J. Rivera,et al.  Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli , 1988 .

[17]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. , 1982 .

[18]  M R D'Amato,et al.  A Comparison of Visual and Auditory Short-Term Memory in Monkeys ‘Cebus Apella’ , 1986, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[19]  M. R. D’amato Sample familiarity and delayed matching in monkeys , 1971 .

[20]  A. Wright,et al.  Psychometric and psychophysical hue discrimination functions for the pigeon. , 1972, Vision research.

[21]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[22]  M. R. D’amato,et al.  Retrieval cues and short-term memory in capuchin monkeys. , 1974 .

[23]  M. Colombo,et al.  On the limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella). , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[24]  B. Weinstein Matching-from-sample by rhesus monkeys and by children. , 1941 .

[25]  David Premack,et al.  The codes of man and beasts , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[26]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing. , 1972 .

[27]  M. R. D’amato,et al.  Delayed matching in the capuchin monkey with brief sample durations , 1972 .

[28]  H. L. Roitblat,et al.  Codes and coding processes in pigeon short-term memory , 1980 .

[29]  J A Nevin,et al.  Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[30]  L. Herman,et al.  Symbolic, identity, and probe delayed matching of sounds by the bottlenosed dolphin , 1982 .

[31]  Ronald J. Schusterman,et al.  Visual Acuity in Pinnipeds , 1972 .

[32]  A. Wright,et al.  Proactive interference in animal memory. , 1986 .

[33]  H. Roitblat,et al.  Sequential effects in pigeon delayed matching-to-sample performance. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[34]  J. S. Blum,et al.  Analysis of matching behavior in chimpanzee. , 1948, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[35]  M. R. D’amato Delayed Matching and Short-Term Memory in Monkeys1 , 1973 .

[36]  H. Roitblat Introduction to comparative cognition , 1987 .

[37]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[38]  D. S. Grant Effect of sample presentation time on long-delay matching in the pigeon , 1976 .

[39]  D. Premack,et al.  Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[40]  T. Zentall,et al.  Same/different concept learning in the pigeon: the effect of negative instances and prior adaptation to transfer stimuli. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.