Simulated annealing band selection approach for hyperspectral imagery

In hyperspectral imagery, greedy modular eigenspace (GME) was developed by clustering highly correlated bands into a smaller subset based on the greedy algorithm. Unfortunately, GME is hard to find the optimal set by greedy scheme except by exhaustive iteration. The long execution time has been the major drawback in practice. Accordingly, finding the optimal (or near-optimal) solution is very expensive. Instead of adopting the band-subset-selection paradigm underlying this approach, we introduce a simulated annealing band selection (SABS) approach, which takes sets of non-correlated bands for high-dimensional remote sensing images based on a heuristic optimization algorithm, to overcome this disadvantage. It utilizes the inherent separability of different classes embedded in high-dimensional data sets to reduce dimensionality and formulate the optimal or near-optimal GME feature. Our proposed SABS scheme has a number of merits. Unlike traditional principal component analysis, it avoids the bias problems that arise from transforming the information into linear combinations of bands. SABS can not only speed up the procedure to simultaneously select the most significant features according to the simulated annealing optimization scheme to find GME sets, but also further extend the convergence abilities in the solution space based on simulated annealing method to reach the global optimal or near-optimal solution and escape from local minima. The effectiveness of the proposed SABS is evaluated by NASA MODIS/ASTER (MASTER) airborne simulator data sets and airborne synthetic aperture radar images for land cover classification during the Pacrim II campaign. The performance of our proposed SABS is validated by supervised k-nearest neighbor classifier. The experimental results show that SABS is an effective technique of band subset selection and can be used as an alternative to the existing dimensionality reduction method.

[1]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  Chin-Chuan Han,et al.  Data fusion of hyperspectral and SAR images , 2004 .

[3]  S. Hook,et al.  The MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER) - a new instrument for earth science studies , 2001 .

[4]  Antonio J. Plaza,et al.  Dimensionality reduction and classification of hyperspectral image data using sequences of extended morphological transformations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Kenneth J. Supowit,et al.  Simulated Annealing Without Rejected Moves , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.

[6]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Sao-Jie Chen,et al.  Simultaneous routing and buffering in floorplan design , 2003, 2003 International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Applications. Proceedings of Technical Papers. (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8672).

[8]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Analyzing high-dimensional multispectral data , 1993, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  John A. Richards,et al.  Segmented principal components transformation for efficient hyperspectral remote-sensing image display and classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  Jing Wang,et al.  Independent component analysis-based dimensionality reduction with applications in hyperspectral image analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Peter E. Hart,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[12]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[13]  John A. Richards,et al.  Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Sao-Jie Chen,et al.  An Enhanced BSA for Floorplanning , 2006, IEICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci..

[15]  E. M. Wright,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[16]  Robert I. Damper,et al.  Band Selection for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Mutual Information , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[17]  Kun-Shan Chen,et al.  Greedy modular eigenspaces and positive Boolean function for supervised hyperspectral image classification , 2003 .

[18]  Luis O. Jimenez-Rodriguez,et al.  Unsupervised Linear Feature-Extraction Methods and Their Effects in the Classification of High-Dimensional Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[19]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Constrained band selection for hyperspectral imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[21]  Thomas L. Ainsworth,et al.  Unsupervised classification using polarimetric decomposition and the complex Wishart classifier , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[22]  Mingyi He,et al.  Band selection based on feature weighting for classification of hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[23]  Qian Du,et al.  A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[24]  David A. Landgrebe,et al.  Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .