Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English

Abstract This paper investigates the roles of language-specific phonological learning and inherent phonetic contrastiveness in the perception of non-native vowels. Native speakers of Korean and Japanese, at two levels of English language experience, were assessed on the perception and production of Australian English monophthongal non-back vowels: /i: i e ae a:/. Prototypicality ratings, or perceived similarities of the foreign vowels to their nearest native (L1) phonemic targets, were also examined, to assess models of cross-language vowel perception. Korean is of interest because of a recent phonological merger of two front vowels (/e/ and /ϵ/), which has produced a generation split among speakers of Seoul dialect above and below 45–50 years of age (Hong, 1991). The present study is the first reported case of how a phonemic merger, resulting in cross-generation differences within a speech community, can influence speakers' perception and production of non-native vowels. The effects of L1 phonological learning on vowel perception were also observed in the tendency of the Japanese, but not the Korean listeners, to normalize tokens of non-native vowels for speaker-dependent durational variation, consistent with the respective phonological roles of vowel length in Japanese and Korean.

[1]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[2]  Yunsook Hong A sociolinguistic study of Seoul Korean , 1991 .

[3]  John Ingram,et al.  Accuracy of perception and production of compound and phrasal stress by Vietnamese-Australians , 1992, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[4]  A. Cutler Segmentation problems, rhythmic solutions * , 1994 .

[5]  A. Liberman,et al.  The motor theory of speech perception revised , 1985, Cognition.

[6]  J. Pittam,et al.  Auditory and acoustic correlates of perceived accent change: Vietnamese schoolchildren acquiring Australian English , 1987 .

[7]  Patricia A. Keating,et al.  Vowel Variation in Japanese , 1984 .

[8]  Sheila E. Blumstein,et al.  Effects of speaking rate on the vowel length distinction in Korean , 1991 .

[9]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' preference for the predominant stress patterns of English words. , 1993, Child development.

[10]  C. Best A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[11]  G. L. Trager,et al.  Linguistics across cultures , 1957 .

[12]  T. M. Nearey Phonetic feature systems for vowels , 1978 .

[13]  John Hajek,et al.  A revised standard phonemic orthography for Australian English vowels 1 , 1994 .

[14]  H. S. Gopal,et al.  A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  Context and speaker effects in the perceptual assimilation of German vowels by American listeners , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[17]  R. Fox Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception , 1994 .