Search Engine Competition with Network Externalities

The market for Internet search is not only economically and socially important, it is also highly concentrated. Is this a problem? We study the question of whether “competition is only a free click away.” We argue that the market for Internet search is characterized by indirect network externalities and construct a simple model of search engine competition, which produces a market share development that fits well the empirically observed developments since 2003. We find that there is a strong tendency toward market tipping and, subsequently, monopolization, with negative consequences on economic welfare. Therefore, we propose to require search engines to share their data on previous searches. We compare the resulting “competitive oligopoly” market structure with the less-competitive current situation and show that our proposal would spur innovation, search quality, consumer surplus, and total welfare. We also discuss the practical feasibility of our policy proposal and sketch the legal issues involved. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

[1]  Yongmin Chen,et al.  Paid Placement: Advertising and Search on the Internet , 2006 .

[2]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Query logs alone are not enough , 2007 .

[3]  Rufus Pollock,et al.  Is Google the Next Microsoft: Competition, Welfare and Regulation in Online Search , 2010 .

[4]  Greg Taylor,et al.  Search Quality and Revenue Cannibalization by Competing Search Engines , 2013 .

[5]  Song Yao,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Sponsored Search Advertising , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[6]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Online Display Advertising: Targeting and Obtrusiveness , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[7]  N. Economides.  Antitrust Issues In Network Industries , 2008 .

[8]  Rahul Telang,et al.  The Market Structure for Internet Search Engines , 2004, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Ingo Vogelsang,et al.  Price Regulation of Access to Telecommunications Networks , 2003 .

[10]  Glenn Ellison,et al.  Position Auctions with Consumer Search , 2007 .

[11]  D. Geradin,et al.  Global Competition Law and Economics , 2007 .

[12]  When is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Antitrust and Innovation , 2010 .

[13]  Daniel F. Spulber.  THE MAP OF COMMERCE: INTERNET SEARCH, COMPETITION, AND THE CIRCULAR FLOW OF INFORMATION , 2009 .

[14]  Ziv Bar-Yossef,et al.  Mining search engine query logs via suggestion sampling , 2008, Proc. VLDB Endow..

[15]  W. Zangwill,et al.  Toward a Theory of Continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve , 1998 .

[16]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Search log analysis: What it is, what's been done, how to do it , 2006 .

[17]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  Minimizing Information Loss and Preserving Privacy , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[18]  James D. Ratliff,et al.  Online Advertising: Defining Relevant Markets , 2010 .

[19]  Eelke Wiersma,et al.  Conditions That Shape the Learning Curve: Factors That Increase the Ability and Opportunity to Learn , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[20]  André de Palma,et al.  Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation , 1995 .

[21]  Shane Greenstein,et al.  The Dynamics of Competition in the Internet Search Engine Market , 2001 .

[22]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Electronic data interchange: competitive externalities and strategic implementation policies , 1995 .

[23]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[24]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[25]  Bar-YossefZiv,et al.  Mining search engine query logs via suggestion sampling , 2008, VLDB 2008.

[26]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization , 1994 .

[27]  Pierre Larouche,et al.  The European Microsoft Case at the Crossroads of Competition Policy and Innovation , 2008 .

[28]  W. Baumol,et al.  Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure , 1982 .

[29]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[30]  Ioannis P. Kokkoris,et al.  The reform of EC competition law : new challenges , 2009 .

[31]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Compatibility, Standardization, and Network Effects: Some Policy Implications , 2002 .

[32]  F. Riggins,et al.  The growth of interorganizational systems in the presence of network externalities , 1994 .

[33]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Search Engine Advertising: Sponsored Search in Electronic Markets , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[34]  N. Economides.  The Economics of Networks , 1995 .

[35]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Search Engine Advertising: Channel Substitution when Pricing Ads to Context , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[36]  Eytan Adar,et al.  User 4XXXXX9: Anonymizing Query Logs , 2007 .

[37]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[38]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .

[39]  M. Armstrong.  The theory of access pricing and interconnection , 2001 .

[40]  J. Rochet,et al.  Competition Policy in Two-Sided Markets , 2008 .

[41]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities , 1995 .

[42]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Mining Query Logs: Turning Search Usage Data into Knowledge , 2010, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[43]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Brand awareness and the evaluation of search results , 2007, WWW '07.

[44]  K. Arrow.  The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[45]  David S. Evans.  The Economics of the Online Advertising Industry , 2008 .