Belief Revision and Argumentation Theory

[1]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  On the Logic of Theory Change: Relations Between Incision and Selection Functions , 2006, ECAI.

[2]  Reinhard Niederée.  Multiple contraction. A further case against Gärdenfors' principle of recovery , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[3]  John L. Pollock,et al.  Belief Revision And Epistemology , 2000, Synthese.

[4]  Peter G¿rdenfors,et al.  Belief Revision , 2003 .

[5]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner.  Postulates for Conditional Belief Revision , 1999, IJCAI.

[6]  Adam J. Grove,et al.  Two modellings for theory change , 1988, J. Philos. Log..

[7]  Jérôme Lang,et al.  Belief Update Revisited , 2007, IJCAI.

[8]  S. Hansson.  In defense of base contraction , 1992, Synthese.

[9]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach , 2003, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

[10]  Didier Dubois,et al.  How to Infer from Inconsisent Beliefs without Revising? , 1995, IJCAI.

[11]  Sven Ove Hansson.  Kernel Contraction , 1994, J. Symb. Log..

[12]  Hiroshi Tomita,et al.  Book Review / Erratum , 2006, Ophthalmologica.

[13]  Guido Boella,et al.  Making Others Believe What They Want , 2008, IFIP AI.

[14]  Sébastien Konieczny,et al.  On the merging of Dung's argumentation systems , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Hirofumi Katsuno,et al.  On the Difference between Updating a Knowledge Base and Revising It , 1991, KR.

[16]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[17]  Johan de Kleer,et al.  An Assumption-Based TMS , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[18]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  A survey of multiple contractions , 1994, J. Log. Lang. Inf..

[19]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Belief contraction without recovery , 1991, Stud Logica.

[20]  Judea Pearl,et al.  On the Logic of Iterated Belief Revision , 1994, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  New operators for theory change , 2008 .

[22]  Sven Ove Hansson.  Belief Revision: A dyadic representation of belief , 1992 .

[23]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Belief Revision: Contents , 1992 .

[24]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Iterated Revision as Prioritized Merging , 2006, KR.

[25]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Argument Theory Change: Revision Upon Warrant , 2008, COMMA.

[26]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  A Thorough Axiomatization of a Principle of Conditional Preservation in Belief Revision , 2004, Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence.

[27]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic logic , 1989, The Logic of Theory Change.

[28]  J. Dekleer.  An assumption-based TMS , 1986 .

[29]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[30]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Three Scenarios for the Revision of Epistemic States , 2008, J. Log. Comput..

[31]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Explanations, belief revision and defeasible reasoning , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[32]  Jon Doyle,et al.  Belief Revision: Reason maintenance and belief revision: Foundations versus coherence theories , 1992 .

[33]  André Fuhrmann,et al.  Theory contraction through base contraction , 1991, J. Philos. Log..

[34]  Abhaya C. Nayak.  Foundational belief change , 1994, J. Philos. Log..

[35]  David Makinson,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Safe contraction , 1985, Stud Logica.

[36]  Claudette Cayrol,et al.  Revision of an Argumentation System , 2008, KR.

[37]  David Makinson,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Contraction functions and their associated revision functions , 2008 .

[38]  Allen Newell,et al.  The Knowledge Level , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[39]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Belief dynamics and defeasible argumentation in rational agents , 2004, NMR.

[40]  Gabriele Kern-Isberner,et al.  Linking Iterated Belief Change Operations to Nonmonotonic Reasoning , 2008, KR.

[41]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  Theory contraction and base contraction unified , 1993, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[42]  Isaac Levi.  Subjunctives, dispositions and chances , 1977 .

[43]  Cristiano Castelfranchi,et al.  The Toulmin Test: Framing Argumentation within Belief Revision Theories , 2006, Arguing on the Toulmin Model.

[44]  Jon Doyle,et al.  A Truth Maintenance System , 1979, Artif. Intell..