Automated Detection, Extraction, and Measurement of Regional Surface Waves

Our goal is to develop and test an effective method to detect, identify, extract, and quantify surface wave signals for weak events observed at regional stations. We describe an automated surface wave detector and extractor designed to work on weak surface wave signals across Eurasia at intermediate periods (8 s-40 s). The method is based on phase-matched filters defined by the Rayleigh wave group travel-time predictions from the broadband group velocity maps presented by RITZWOLLER and LEVSHIN (1998) and RITZWOLLER et al. (1998) and proceeds in three steps: Signal compression, signal extraction or cleaning, and measurement. First, the dispersed surface wave signals are compressed in time by applying an anti-dispersion or phase-matched filter defined from the group velocity maps. We refer to this as the ‘compressed signal.’ Second, the surface wave is then extracted by filtering ‘noise’ temporally isolated from the time-compressed signal. This filtered signal is then redispersed by applying the inverse of the phase-matched filter. Finally, we adaptively estimate spectral amplitude as well as group and phase velocity on the filtered signal. The method is naturally used as a detector by allowing origin time to slide along the time axis. We describe preliminary results of the application of this method to a set of nuclear explosions and earthquakes that occurred on or near the Chinese Lop Nor test site from 1992 through 1996 and one explosion on the Indian Rajasthan test site that occurred in May of 1998.

[1]  M. Cara,et al.  Filtering of Dispersed Wavetrains , 1973 .

[2]  M. Ritzwoller,et al.  INTERMEDIATE-PERIOD GROUP-VELOCITY MAPS ACROSS CENTRAL ASIA, WESTERN CHINAAND PARTS OF THE MIDDLE EAST , 1998 .

[3]  Anatoli L. Levshin,et al.  Eurasian surface wave tomography: Group velocities , 1998 .

[4]  K. L. McLaughlin,et al.  Improved Methods for Regionalized Surface Wave Analysis. , 1997 .

[5]  Jon Berger,et al.  Peculiarities of surface-wave propagation across central Eurasia , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  Application of frequency variable filters to surface-wave amplitude analysis , 1988 .

[7]  Mehdi Rezapour,et al.  Bias in surface-wave magnitude Ms due to inadequate distance corrections , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[8]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  Free software helps map and display data , 1991 .

[9]  Jeffry L. Stevens,et al.  Optimization of Surface Wave Identification and Measurement , 2001 .

[10]  Gabi Laske,et al.  CRUST 5.1: A global crustal model at 5° × 5° , 1998 .

[11]  A. Dziewoński,et al.  A technique for the analysis of transient seismic signals , 1969 .

[12]  Eugene Herrin,et al.  Phase-matched filters: Application to the study of Rayleigh waves , 1977, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[13]  J. Rial,et al.  Group-velocity tomography of South America and the surrounding oceans , 1999 .

[14]  Anatoli L. Levshin,et al.  A Fast and Reliable Method for Surface Wave Tomography , 2001 .

[15]  M. Ritzwoller,et al.  Characteristics of surface waves generated by events on and near the Chinese nuclear test site , 1995 .

[16]  Jeffry L. Stevens,et al.  Estimation of scalar moments from explosion-generated surface waves , 1986 .

[17]  Anatoli L. Levshin,et al.  Seismic surface waves in a laterally inhomogeneous earth , 1989 .

[18]  G. Laske,et al.  A shear - velocity model of the mantle , 1996, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  M. Ritzwoller,et al.  New constraints on the arctic crust and uppermost mantle: surface wave group velocities, Pn, and Sn , 2001 .

[20]  Walter H. F. Smith,et al.  New version of the generic mapping tools , 1995 .