Human Thermal Comfort and Heat Removal Efficiency for Ventilation Variants in Passenger Cars

The realization of a comfortable thermal environment with low energy consumption and improved ventilation in a car has become the aim of manufacturers in recent decades. Novel ventilation concepts with more flexible cabin usage and layouts are appealing owing to their potential for improving passenger comfort and driving power. In this study, three variant ventilation concepts are investigated and their performance is compared with respect to energy efficiency and human comfort of the driver and passenger in front and a child in the rear compartment. FLUENT 16.0, a commercial three-dimensional (3D) software, are used for the simulation. A surface-to-surface radiation model is applied under transient conditions for a car parked in summer conditions with its engine in the running condition. The results for the standard Fanger’s model and modified Fanger’s model are analyzed, discussed, and compared for the driver, passenger, and child. The modified Fanger’s model determines the thermal sensation on the basis of mean arterial pressure.

[1]  Miloš Fojtlín,et al.  Impact of measurable physical phenomena on contact thermal comfort , 2017 .

[2]  Honghyun Cho,et al.  Experimental study on the change in driver’s physiological signals in automobile HVAC system under Full load condition , 2017 .

[3]  Andreea Vartires.  THE HUMAN THERMAL COMFORT EVALUATION INSIDE THE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT , 2011 .

[4]  Thomas Sattelmayer,et al.  ADIABATIC FLOW SIMULATION IN AN AIR-CONDITIONED VEHICLE PASSENGER COMPARTMENT , 2014 .

[5]  Morteza Abdolzadeh,et al.  Air flow simulation of HVAC system in compartment of a passenger coach , 2017 .

[6]  Peter Dabnichki,et al.  Core and local skin temperature: 3–24 months old toddlers and comparison to adults , 2016 .

[7]  Wolfgang Nitsche,et al.  New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics , 1999 .

[8]  J. W. Wan,et al.  Influence of the position of supply and exhaust openings on comfort in a passenger vehicle , 2014 .

[9]  Shengwei Zhu,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of micro-environmental conditions in public transportation buses , 2010, Building and Environment.

[10]  Muzaffar Ali,et al.  Revisiting Fanger’s thermal comfort model using mean blood pressure as a bio-marker: An experimental investigation , 2016 .

[11]  Miloš Fojtlín,et al.  An innovative HVAC control system: Implementation and testing in a vehicular cabin. , 2017, Journal of thermal biology.

[12]  Kai Sirén,et al.  Evaluating the thermal comfort performance of heating systems using a thermal manikin with human thermoregulatory control , 2016 .

[13]  Ali Alahmer,et al.  Vehicular thermal comfort models; a comprehensive review , 2011 .

[14]  Christian Suárez,et al.  Parametric Investigation Using Computational Fluid Dynamics of the HVAC Air Distribution in a Railway Vehicle for Representative Weather and Operating Conditions , 2017 .

[15]  Taeyoung Han,et al.  A Model for Relating a Thermal Comfort Scale to EHT Comfort Index , 2004 .

[16]  Muhsin Kilic,et al.  Investigation of transient cooling of an automobile cabin with a virtual manikin under solar radiation , 2013 .

[17]  Sandip Pawar,et al.  Evaluation of Cabin Comfort in Air Conditioned Buses Using CFD , 2014 .

[18]  Tony Schwenn,et al.  A Comparison of Physiology-Based Metrics to Environment-Based Metrics for Evaluating Thermal Comfort , 2013 .

[19]  Ali Alahmer,et al.  Vehicular Cabins' Thermal Comfort Zones; Fanger and Berkley Modeling , 2013 .

[20]  Mihaela Simion,et al.  Factors which Influence the Thermal Comfort Inside of Vehicles , 2016 .

[21]  Miroslav Jicha,et al.  Impact of air distribution system on quality of ventilation in small aircraft cabin , 2013 .