Interactive Multicriteria Decision Aiding Under Risk—Methods and Applications

In the paper a discrete multicriteria decision making problem under risk is considered. It is assumed that the set of alternatives consists of a finite number of elements that are explicitly described. The evaluations of alternatives with respect to criteria are represented by distribution functions. The decision maker tries to find a solution preferred to all other solutions. To solve the problem one has to analyze the decision maker's preferences. In the study interactive approach is used. Three interactive methods and its applications in operations management are presented.

[1]  Maciej Nowak,et al.  INSDECM - an interactive procedure for stochastic multicriteria decision problems , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[3]  H. Markowitz The Utility of Wealth , 1952, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Interactive multiple goal programming , 1981 .

[5]  Arthur M. Geoffrion,et al.  An Interactive Approach for Multi-Criterion Optimization, with an Application to the Operation of an Academic Department , 1972 .

[6]  Moshe Leshno,et al.  Preferred by "All" and Preferred by "Most" Decision Makers: Almost Stochastic Dominance , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Models Of Man : Social And Rational , 1957 .

[8]  R. G. Vickson,et al.  On the Relative Effectiveness of Stochastic Dominance Rules: Extension to Decreasingly Risk-Averse Utility Functions , 1977, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[10]  Maciej Nowak,et al.  Preference and veto thresholds in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Moshe Leshno,et al.  Stochastic dominance in an ordinal world , 1996 .

[13]  Maciej A. Nowak An Application of Interactive Multiple Criteria Technic in Labor Planning , 2008 .

[14]  Elias N. Houstis,et al.  Multiobjective decisions analysis for engineering systems , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  Philippe Vincke,et al.  An outranking method under uncertainty , 1988 .

[16]  Maciek Nowak,et al.  Interactive approach in multicriteria analysis based on stochastic dominance , 2004 .

[17]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[18]  Josef Hadar,et al.  Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects , 1969 .

[19]  R. Benayoun,et al.  Linear programming with multiple objective functions: Step method (stem) , 1971, Math. Program..

[20]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[21]  Ronny Aboudi,et al.  Efficient Algorithms for Stochastic Dominance Tests Based on Financial Market Data , 1994 .

[22]  Ilan Vertinsky,et al.  Stochastic Dominance Rules for Multi-attribute Utility Functions , 1978 .

[23]  Jean-Marc Martel,et al.  A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making , 1986 .

[24]  Tomasz Błaszczyk,et al.  The time‐cost trade‐off analysis in construction project using computer simulation and interactive procedure , 2009 .

[25]  Jean-Marc Martel,et al.  Multiattribute Analysis Based on Stochastic Dominance , 1994 .