Evaluation of image quality of personal ultrasound imager: Comparison with the conventional machine

ObjectiveTo determine if the image quality of a personal ultrasound imager (PUI) is as good as that of a conventional machine (CM).Materials and MethodsNinety patients were studied by the same operator using both the PUI and CM. The quality of the B-mode images obtained from these patients was scored 0, 1 or 2, defined as poor, fair, or good, respectively. Liver-tumor vascularity depicted by power Doppler imaging (PDI) and directional PDI (DPDI) was classified as 0, no blood signal; 1, dot-like blood signal within the tumor; 2, mild blood-flow signal within the tumor; and 3, abundant blood-flow signal within the tumor.ResultsThe mean score of PUI and CM B-mode image quality was 7.47±0.92 and 7.54±0.99 (mean±SD), respectively (p=0.531). On PDI, grade of vascularity of the liver tumors determined with the PUI was 4.44 and 4.68 in those determined with the CM (p=0.78). On DPDI, tumor vascularity was 3.12 when scored by the PUI and 4.29 when scored with the CM (p=0.03). The qualities of images acquired by the PUI and CM were significantly correlated.ConclusionThe quality of B-mode images acquired using the PUI and CM are statistically the same, and they share a similar ability to detect intratumoral blood-flow signals on PDI. Because of its extreme portability, the PUI is expected to become a valuable diagnostic tool in the clinic.