A Formal Approach to Modeling the Cost of Cognitive Control

This paper introduces a formal method to model the level of demand on control when executing cognitive processes. The cost of cognitive control is parsed into an intensity cost which encapsulates how much additional input information is required so as to get the specified response, and an interaction cost which encapsulates the level of interference between individual processes in a network. We develop a formal relationship between the probability of successful execution of desired processes and the control signals (additive control biases). This relationship is also used to specify optimal control policies to achieve a desired probability of activation for processes. We observe that there are boundary cases when finding such control policies which leads us to introduce the interaction cost. We show that the interaction cost is influenced by the relative strengths of individual processes, as well as the directionality of the underlying competition between processes.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Controlled vs. Automatic Processing: A Graph-Theoretic Approach to the Analysis of Serial vs. Parallel Processing in Neural Network Architectures , 2016, CogSci.

[3]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function , 2013, Neuron.

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  R. Baumeister,et al.  Self-control as limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[8]  C. Summerfield,et al.  An information theoretical approach to prefrontal executive function , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  Angela L. Duckworth,et al.  An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[10]  J D Cohen,et al.  Multitasking versus multiplexing: Toward a normative account of limitations in the simultaneous execution of control-demanding behaviors , 2014, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[12]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Attention and cognitive control. , 1975 .

[14]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism. , 2015, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  Daniel A. Braun,et al.  Thermodynamics as a theory of decision-making with information-processing costs , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[16]  M. Botvinick Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Computational and Neural Basis of Cognitive Control: Charted Territory and New Frontiers , 2014, Cogn. Sci..