Transfer Price Negotiation in the Presence of Unequal Bargaining Power: The Effect of a Peer Evaluation Scheme on Inter-divisional Profit Distribution

This study examines how managers balance economic incentives and inter-divisional equity considerations during transfer price negotiations. Our experiment shows that both buyers and sellers are willing to give up a significant amount of their profits to pursue a more equitable outcome (one that results in greater inter-divisional profit equalisation). We also find that incorporating peer evaluation schemes into negotiators' formal incentive plans has both economic and social-psychological impacts on negotiation behaviour, resulting in even greater inter-divisional profit equalisation. While this outcome may seem ‘fairer’ to the individual managers, from the firms' perspective profit equalisation can obscure divisional performance, potentially leading to resource allocation inefficiencies.

[1]  Ken T. Trotman,et al.  The effect of framing and negotiation partner's objective on judgments about negotiated transfer prices , 2008 .

[2]  E. Fehr A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[3]  Frank Moers,et al.  Discretion and Bias in Performance Evaluation: The Impact of Diversity and Subjectivity , 2001 .

[4]  Dipankar Ghosh Complementary arrangements of organizational factors and outcomes of negotiated transfer price , 2000 .

[5]  Regina M. Anctil,et al.  Negotiated Transfer Pricing and Divisional Versus Firm-Wide Performance Evaluation , 1999 .

[6]  M. Bazerman,et al.  When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  P. Kim,et al.  Choosing the path to bargaining power: an empirical comparison of BATNAs and contributions in negotiation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  P. Bolton,et al.  Corporate Finance, the Theory of the Firm, and Organizations , 1998 .

[9]  Treena L. Gillespie Internationalizing 360-Degree Feedback: Are Subordinate Ratings Comparable? , 2005 .

[10]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[11]  James W. Smither,et al.  Accountability: The Achilles' Heel of Multisource Feedback , 1997 .

[12]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact Of Collectivism And In-Group/Out-Group Membership On The Evaluation Generosity Of Team Members , 2000 .

[13]  A. Galinsky,et al.  First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  Chet Robie,et al.  Applying the social relations model to self and peer evaluations , 2001 .

[15]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  The Effect of Similarity on Performance Ratings and Interrater Agreement , 1989 .

[16]  Lynn K. Harland,et al.  Peer Performance Appraisals , 1995 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[18]  Arthur G. Bedeian,et al.  The Impact of Purpose On Rating Quality and User Acceptance , 1991 .

[19]  B. Spicer,et al.  TOWARDS AN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY OF THE TRANSFER PRICING PROCESS. , 1988 .

[20]  Charles E. Naquin,et al.  Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments , 2005 .

[21]  M. Bazerman,et al.  The Effects of Framing and Negotiator Overconfidence on Bargaining Behaviors and Outcomes , 1985 .

[22]  I. M. Jawahar,et al.  WHERE ALL THE CHILDREN ARE ABOVE AVERAGE: THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PURPOSE EFFECT , 1997 .

[23]  Susan F. Haka,et al.  Does ABC Information Exacerbate Hold‐Up Problems in Buyer‐Supplier Negotiations? , 2008 .

[24]  Dipankar Ghosh,et al.  The Effect of Framing and Compensation Structure on Seller's Negotiated Transfer Price , 2006 .

[25]  Steven J. Kachelmeier,et al.  Negotiated Transfer Pricing: Is Fairness Easier Said than Done? , 2002 .

[26]  Kristy L. Towry Control in a Teamwork Environment—The Impact of Social Ties on the Effectiveness of Mutual Monitoring Contracts , 2003 .

[27]  Rebecca J. Bennett,et al.  The Impact of Alternatives to Settlement in Dyadic Negotiation , 1994 .