99mTc-Hydrazinonicotinamide Epidermal Growth Factor–Polyethylene Glycol–Quantum Dot Imaging Allows Quantification of Breast Cancer Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Monitors Receptor Downregulation in Response to Cetuximab Therapy

Therapy of cancer, including basallike breast tumors, that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) would greatly benefit from noninvasive methods that can quantitatively monitor receptor status and treatment response. Methods: Here, we investigated the potential of a novel technique based on streptavidin cadmium selenide/zinc sulfide quantum dots (Qdots) multiplexed with polyethylene glycol (PEG), epidermal growth factor (EGF), and 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide. In vitro binding affinity and specificity were evaluated in cultured cells. Biodistribution studies and in vivo imaging were performed in murine breast tumor xenografts of basallike phenotype MDA-MB-468 cells and EGFR-negative cells. Results: 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide EGF-PEG-Qdot showed specific and high-affinity EGFR targeting on confocal microscopy, immunoblotting, and binding assays. When intravenously injected, MDA-MB-468 tumors were visualized with high contrast by both optical and scintigraphic imaging. Scintigraphic image–based quantification correctly discriminated high–EGFR-expressing MDA-MB-468 tumors from other tumors, and image-based tumor uptake closely correlated to EGFR content. Importantly, serial imaging of MDA-MB-468 tumors responding to cetuximab therapy could detect a significant reduction of tumor uptake that was paralleled by downregulation of EGFR expression. Furthermore, high baseline uptake predicted good response to cetuximab therapy. Conclusion: 99mTc-hydrazinonicotinamide EGF-PEG-Qdot provides EGFR-targeted imaging of breast tumors and may allow noninvasive monitoring of EGFR status in living subjects before and after targeted therapies.

[1]  Finbarr O'Sullivan,et al.  Molecular Imaging Research in the Outcomes Era: Measuring Outcomes for Individualized Cancer Therapy 1 Most of Cancer Imaging Thus Far Has Been Directed To- Ward Cancer Detection and Staging. the Principle Guiding , 2022 .

[2]  F. Révillion,et al.  Prognostic value of the type I growth factor receptors in a large series of human primary breast cancers quantified with a real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. , 2000, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[3]  A. Bardelli,et al.  Biomarkers Predicting Clinical Outcome of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor–Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer , 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  H. Maecke Radiolabeled peptides in nuclear oncology: influence of peptide structure and labeling strategy on pharmacology. , 2005, Ernst Schering Research Foundation workshop.

[5]  Haeshin Lee,et al.  N-Terminal Site-Specific Mono-PEGylation of Epidermal Growth Factor , 2003, Pharmaceutical Research.

[6]  Joseph M. Wu,et al.  Anti-EGFR Therapy: Mechanism and Advances in Clinical Efficacy in Breast Cancer , 2009, Journal of oncology.

[7]  Shuang Liu Bifunctional coupling agents for radiolabeling of biomolecules and target-specific delivery of metallic radionuclides. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[8]  J. Farndon,et al.  EPIDERMAL-GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR STATUS AS PREDICTOR OF EARLY RECURRENCE OF AND DEATH FROM BREAST CANCER , 1987, The Lancet.

[9]  John C Gore,et al.  Molecular Imaging of Therapeutic Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Blockade in Colorectal Cancer , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[10]  W. Rose,et al.  Therapeutic Synergy of Oral Taxane BMS-275183 and Cetuximab versus Human Tumor Xenografts , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[11]  A. Rowan Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals , 1979 .

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Xiaoxiao Gao,et al.  New agents in development for breast cancer , 2007, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[14]  R. Schiffelers,et al.  Downregulation of EGFR by a novel multivalent nanobody-liposome platform. , 2010, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[15]  Wen-Lin Kuo,et al.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[16]  J. Baselga,et al.  Critical update and emerging trends in epidermal growth factor receptor targeting in cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  C. Arteaga The epidermal growth factor receptor: from mutant oncogene in nonhuman cancers to therapeutic target in human neoplasia. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  S. Nie,et al.  In vivo cancer targeting and imaging with semiconductor quantum dots , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  microPET-Based Biodistribution of Quantum Dots in Living Mice , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  Sanjiv S Gambhir,et al.  Peptide-labeled near-infrared quantum dots for imaging tumor vasculature in living subjects. , 2006, Nano letters.

[21]  Y. Yarden,et al.  Untangling the ErbB signalling network , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[22]  Ron C. Hardman A Toxicologic Review of Quantum Dots: Toxicity Depends on Physicochemical and Environmental Factors , 2005, Environmental health perspectives.

[23]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Quantum Dots for Live Cells, in Vivo Imaging, and Diagnostics , 2005, Science.

[24]  David L. Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression In vivo: Pharmacokinetic and Biodistribution Characterization of a Bioconjugated Quantum Dot Nanoprobe , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[25]  Xiaoyuan Chen,et al.  Characterizing breast cancer xenograft epidermal growth factor receptor expression by using near-infrared optical imaging , 2009, Acta radiologica.

[26]  Nicholas A Peppas,et al.  Opsonization, biodistribution, and pharmacokinetics of polymeric nanoparticles. , 2006, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[27]  D. Euhus,et al.  Tumor measurement in the nude mouse , 1986, Journal of surgical oncology.

[28]  Alfredo Ribeiro Silva Remarkably high frequency of EGFR expression in breast carcinomas with squamous differentiation. , 2006, International journal of surgical pathology.

[29]  S. Lakhani,et al.  Demystifying basal-like breast carcinomas , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[30]  Chun Li,et al.  Near-infrared optical imaging of epidermal growth factor receptor in breast cancer xenografts. , 2003, Cancer research.

[31]  R. Weissleder,et al.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology , 2008, Nature.

[32]  Adriana L. Gonzalez,et al.  Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Antibody Down-regulates Mutant Receptors and Inhibits Tumors Expressing EGFR Mutations* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  Robert Sinclair,et al.  Particle size, surface coating, and PEGylation influence the biodistribution of quantum dots in living mice. , 2008, Small.

[34]  C. Perou,et al.  Phenotypic evaluation of the basal-like subtype of invasive breast carcinoma , 2006, Modern Pathology.

[35]  Noriaki Ohuchi,et al.  In vivo real-time tracking of single quantum dots conjugated with monoclonal anti-HER2 antibody in tumors of mice. , 2007, Cancer research.