A Comparison Between Two Physical Therapy Treatment Programs for Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Study Design. Multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Objective. To compare two physical therapy programs for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Summary of Background Data. Scant evidence exists regarding effectiveness of nonsurgical management programs for lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods. Fifty-eight patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were randomized to one of two 6-week physical therapy programs. One program included manual physical therapy, body weight supported treadmill walking, and exercise (Manual Physical Therapy, Exercise, and Walking Group), while the other included lumbar flexion exercises, a treadmill walking program, and subtherapeutic ultrasound (Flexion Exercise and Walking Group). Perceived recovery was assessed with a global rating of change scale. Secondary outcomes included: Oswestry, a numerical pain rating scale, a measure of satisfaction, and a treadmill test. Testing occurred at baseline, 6 weeks, and 1 year. Perceived recovery, pain, and other healthcare resources used were collected with a long-term follow-up questionnaire. Results. A greater proportion of patients in the manual physical therapy, exercise, and walking group reported recovery at 6 weeks compared with the flexion exercise and walking group (P = 0.0015), with a number needed to treat for perceived recovery of 2.6 (confidence interval, 1.8–7.8). At 1 year, 62% and 41% of the manual therapy, exercise, and walking group and the flexion exercise and walking group, respectively, still met the threshold for recovery. Improvements in disability, satisfaction, and treadmill walking tests favored the manual physical therapy, exercise, and walking group at all follow-up points. Conclusions. Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis can benefit from physical therapy. Additional gains may be realized with the inclusion of manual physical therapy interventions, exercise, and a progressive body-weight supported treadmill walking program.

[1]  R. Deyo,et al.  United States Trends in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Conditions , 2005, Spine.

[2]  John D. Childs,et al.  Responsiveness of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale in Patients with Low Back Pain , 2005, Spine.

[3]  D. Singer,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes of Surgical and Nonsurgical Management of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: 8 to 10 Year Results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study , 2005, Spine.

[4]  C. Turkelson,et al.  Treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2004, American family physician.

[5]  John R. Johnson,et al.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  H. Bohlman,et al.  Surgery of the Lumbar Spine for Spinal Stenosis in 118 Patients 70 Years of Age or Older , 2003, Spine.

[7]  J. Fritz,et al.  Nonsurgical management of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a literature review and a case series of three patients managed with physical therapy. , 2003, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[8]  M. Aebi,et al.  Elective lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: is it a high-risk operation? , 2003, Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie.

[9]  B. Jolles,et al.  Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis. Five-year follow-up. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  B. Jolles,et al.  Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis , 2001 .

[11]  D. Moher,et al.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[12]  J. Fritz,et al.  A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. , 2001, Physical therapy.

[13]  J N Weinstein,et al.  The Impact of Spinal Problems on the Health Status of Patients: Have We Underestimated the Effect? , 2000, Spine.

[14]  M. Abdelnoor,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study. , 2000, Spine.

[15]  M. Mariconda,et al.  Factors influencing the outcome of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 2000, Journal of spinal disorders.

[16]  F. Cammisa,et al.  Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical and Outcome Results and a 3-Year Survivorship Analysis , 2000, Spine.

[17]  G. Haar,et al.  Therapeutic ultrasound. , 1999, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[18]  M. Fukusaki,et al.  Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection. , 1998, The Clinical journal of pain.

[19]  K. Tallroth,et al.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of long-term outcome 12 years after operative and conservative treatment. , 1998, Journal of spinal disorders.

[20]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic Effects on the Lumbar Spinal Canal: Axially Loaded CT‐Myelography and MRI in Patients With Sciatica and/or Neurogenic Claudication , 1997, Spine.

[21]  J. Fritz,et al.  Preliminary results of the use of a two-stage treadmill test as a clinical diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[22]  J. Fritz,et al.  A nonsurgical treatment approach for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[23]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Plantar pressure reduction in an incremental weight-bearing system. , 1997, Physical therapy.

[24]  V. Haughton,et al.  Anatomic Changes of the Spinal Canal and Intervertebral Foramen Associated With Flexion‐Extension Movement , 1996, Spine.

[25]  R. Swezey.  Outcomes for Lumbar Stenosis , 1996, Journal of clinical rheumatology : practical reports on rheumatic & musculoskeletal diseases.

[26]  M. Liang,et al.  Measurement Properties of a Self‐Administered Outcome Measure in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1996, Spine.

[27]  R A Deyo,et al.  An Assessment of Surgery for Spinal Stenosis: Time Trends, Geographic Variations, Complications, and Reoperations , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[28]  D M Long,et al.  Persistent back pain and sciatica in the United States: patient characteristics. , 1996, Journal of spinal disorders.

[29]  M. Liang,et al.  Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[30]  P. Thompson,et al.  ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription , 1995 .

[31]  R. Deyo,et al.  Physician Office Visits for Low Back Pain: Frequency, Clinical Evaluation, and Treatment Patterns From a U.S. National Survey , 1995, Spine.

[32]  R. Deyo,et al.  Low Back Pain Hospitalization: Recent United States Trends and Regional Variations , 1994, Spine.

[33]  P. Webb,et al.  Delayed postoperative paraplegia with hypotension in adult revision scoliosis surgery. , 1994, Spine.

[34]  Dore Naunton,et al.  Peripheral Manipulation (3rd ed.) , 1993 .

[35]  H. Sarı,et al.  Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Clinical/Radiologic Therapeutic Evaluation in 145 Patients‐Conservative Treatment or Surgical Intervention? , 1993, Spine.

[36]  R. Deyo,et al.  Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Attempted Meta‐Analysis of the Literature , 1992, Spine.

[37]  R. Deyo,et al.  Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis , 1992 .

[38]  H. Barbeau,et al.  Influence of body weight support on normal human gait: development of a gait retraining strategy. , 1991, Physical therapy.

[39]  A. Udén,et al.  The effect of decompression on the natural course of spinal stenosis. A comparison of surgically treated and untreated patients. , 1991, Spine.

[40]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[41]  Z. Zhihua,et al.  The Effect of Flexion-Extension Motion of the Lumbar Spine on the Capacity of the Spinal Canal: An Experimental Study , 1989 .

[42]  T. Hansson,et al.  Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: An experimental study in vitro , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[43]  L. Dai,et al.  The effect of flexion-extension motion of the lumbar spine on the capacity of the spinal canal. An experimental study. , 1989, Spine.

[44]  J. Wilmink,et al.  Posture-dependent Bilateral Compression of L4 or L5 Nerve Roots in Facet Hypertrophy: A Dynamic CT-myelographic Study , 1987, Spine.

[45]  V. Goel,et al.  Kinematics of Lumbar Intervertebral Foramen , 1983, Spine.

[46]  D. Yates,et al.  Peripheral Manipulation , 1978 .