Gait pathology assessed with Gillette Gait Index in patients after CNS tumour treatment.

Brain tumour is the third leading cause of death in children and adolescents younger than 16 years of age. The increasing survival rate of these patients makes their follow-up and quality of life assessment an important task. This study evaluated the gait pathology of the patients after the combined treatment for central nervous system (CNS) tumours. It assessed if the severity of gait deviation depended on the tumour site or age of illness onset. Gait analysis was performed on patients who completed the treatment (neurosurgery, chemo- and radiotherapy) and were disease-free at the time of the study. One hundred and five patients, 42 girls and 63 boys, aged 5-24 years of age, participated in the study. Depending on the location of the tumour, patients were divided into six groups. The Gillette Gait Index (GGI) was used to quantify gait deviation of patients compared to healthy subjects. Gait analysis was undertaken using VICON 460 movement analysis system. The Helen Hayes marker set was used, together with the Vicon Plug-in-Gait model. For each child the GGI was calculated separately for the left and right legs using data extracted from the subjects' averaged data. The results from left and right legs were then pooled together. To determine the effect of the tumour site and the onset of illness the ANOVA Kruskal-Wallis and correlation tests were used. The GGI did not depend on the tumour site, but demonstrated significant gait pathology in all patients. The age of illness onset appeared to influence the severity of gait deviation.

[1]  S. Millis,et al.  Rehabilitation needs of an inpatient medical oncology unit. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[2]  K. Bell,et al.  Rehabilitation of the patient with brain tumor , 1998 .

[3]  W. Skalli,et al.  Normalcy gait index and kinematics: Uncertainty and repeatability on healthy children database , 2006 .

[4]  M T Yasamy,et al.  Foot drop following brain lesion. , 1995, Surgical neurology.

[5]  L. Schutte,et al.  An index for quantifying deviations from normal gait. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[6]  T. Elkin,et al.  Survivors of childhood brain tumors: behavioral, emotional, and social adjustment. , 2002, Clinical psychology review.

[7]  A. Hof Scaling gait data to body size , 1996 .

[8]  Manuela Galli,et al.  Analysis of the correlation between three methods used in the assessment of children with cerebral palsy. , 2007, Functional neurology.

[9]  M Crivellini,et al.  Use of the normalcy index for the evaluation of gait pathology. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[10]  Postural sway in children and young adults, survivors of CNS tumours. , 2008, Advances in medical sciences.

[11]  M. Syczewska,et al.  Functional status of children after treatment for a malignant tumour of the CNS: a preliminary report. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[12]  I. Sun,et al.  Foot drop: The first sign of an intracranial tumor? , 2007, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Johansen-Berg Motor Physiology: A Brain of Two Halves , 2003, Current Biology.

[14]  D Timmann,et al.  The influence of focal cerebellar lesions on the control and adaptation of gait. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.