Temporal characteristics of global motion processing revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation

The ability to detect the motion of objects is critical to survival, and understanding the cortical mechanisms involved in this process remains a key challenge in sensory neuroscience. A relatively new approach to this problem is to temporarily disrupt processing at specific cortical sites and measure the behavioural consequences. Several previous studies have shown that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of human visual area V5/MT disrupts global motion perception, but reports vary widely in the timescale of this effect. To resolve this issue we employed psychophysical techniques to investigate how discrimination of translational, rotational and radial global motion is affected by TMS. Prior to applying TMS we established baseline coherence thresholds for global motion perception. Adopting each observer’s coherence level at threshold we examined how TMS delivered to V5/MT modulated performance. Importantly, we measured the influence of single‐pulse TMS over a broad temporal range to reveal the fine temporal structure of the disruption profile for global motion perception. Results show that the disruption profile consisted of two distinct epochs during which global direction judgments were reliably impaired, separated by an interval in which performance was unaffected. The bimodal nature of the distribution profiles is consistent with feedforward and feedback processing between visual areas mediating global motion processing. We present a novel quantitative model that characterizes the contribution of each process to visual motion perception.

[1]  Paul V McGraw,et al.  Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia , 2003, Vision Research.

[2]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Distinguishing subregions of the human MT+ complex using visual fields and pursuit eye movements. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Ziad Nahas,et al.  A combined TMS/fMRI study of intensity-dependent TMS over motor cortex , 1999, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  D. Heeger,et al.  Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. I. A continuum of response selectivity to large-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  TMS disruption of V5/MT+ indicates a role for the dorsal stream in word recognition , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  Tony Ro,et al.  Feedback Contributions to Visual Awareness in Human Occipital Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.

[8]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Activity in Human Areas V1/V2, V3, and V5 during the Perception of Coherent and Incoherent Motion , 1996, NeuroImage.

[9]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognitive neuroscience , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  Robert Sekuler,et al.  Coherent global motion percepts from stochastic local motions , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  S. Zeki,et al.  The Organization of Connections between Areas V5 and V1 in Macaque Monkey Visual Cortex , 1989, The European journal of neuroscience.

[13]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Motion streaks provide a spatial code for motion direction , 1999, Nature.

[14]  S. Anand,et al.  The selectivity and timing of motion processing in human temporo–parieto–occipital and occipital cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Interference with vision by TMS over the occipital pole: a fourth period , 2003, Neuroreport.

[16]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[17]  S. Zeki,et al.  Human area V5 and motion in the ipsilateral visual field , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[18]  J. Bullier.  Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[19]  D. Heeger,et al.  Retinotopy and Functional Subdivision of Human Areas MT and MST , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Aramideh,et al.  Eyelid movements: behavioral studies of blinking in humans under different stimulus conditions. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Takeo Watanabe,et al.  3D surface perception from motion involves a temporal–parietal network , 2009, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  David R. Badcock,et al.  Global motion perception: Interaction of the ON and OFF pathways , 1994, Vision Research.

[24]  K. D. Singh,et al.  Localization and functional analysis of human cortical area V5 using magneto-encephalography , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  Jacob Jolij,et al.  Figure–ground segregation requires two distinct periods of activity in V1: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2005, Neuroreport.

[26]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[27]  R. Wurtz,et al.  Sensitivity of MST neurons to optic flow stimuli. II. Mechanisms of response selectivity revealed by small-field stimuli. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  The connections of the middle temporal visual area (MT) and their relationship to a cortical hierarchy in the macaque monkey , 1983, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[30]  Robin Laycock,et al.  Evidence for fast signals and later processing in human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS study of motion perception. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  S. Zeki.  Functional organization of a visual area in the posterior bank of the superior temporal sulcus of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  Angelika Lingnau,et al.  Selective visual responses to expansion and rotation in the human MT complex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging adaptation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Hierarchical organization and functional streams in the visual cortex , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[35]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Positron Emission Tomography: A New Method for Studying Connectivity of the Human Cerebral Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  D. Braun,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of extrastriate cortex degrades human motion direction discrimination , 1994, Vision Research.

[37]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[38]  S. Zeki,et al.  The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[39]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  Koji Inui,et al.  Temporal analysis of the flow from V1 to the extrastriate cortex in humans. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  C. N. Guy,et al.  The parallel visual motion inputs into areas V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex. , 1995, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[42]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Sensitivity to optic flow in human cortical areas MT and MST , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[43]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  D. Burr,et al.  Temporal integration of optic flow, measured by contrast and coherence thresholds , 2001, Vision Research.

[45]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The temporal characteristics of motion processing in hMT/V5+: Combining fMRI and neuronavigated TMS , 2006, NeuroImage.

[46]  E H de Haan,et al.  Spatial and temporal characteristics of visual motion perception involving V5 visual cortex , 2002, Neurological research.

[47]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[48]  D. G. Albrecht.  Visual cortex neurons in monkey and cat: Effect of contrast on the spatial and temporal phase transfer functions , 1995, Visual Neuroscience.

[49]  F. Mechler,et al.  Temporal coding of contrast in primary visual cortex: when, what, and why. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[50]  R. Shapley,et al.  The effect of contrast on the transfer properties of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[51]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Concurrent TMS-fMRI and Psychophysics Reveal Frontal Influences on Human Retinotopic Visual Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[52]  E Corthout,et al.  Suppression of vision by transcranial magnetic stimulation: a third mechanism , 2000, Neuroreport.

[53]  O. Braddick,et al.  Brain Areas Sensitive to Coherent Visual Motion , 2001, Perception.

[54]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[55]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[56]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[57]  Mark W Greenlee,et al.  Neural correlates of coherent audiovisual motion perception. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  P A Salin,et al.  Response selectivity of neurons in area MT of the macaque monkey during reversible inactivation of area V1. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[59]  Klaus Funke,et al.  Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on single‐unit activity in the cat primary visual cortex , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[60]  J. M. Hupé,et al.  Cortical feedback improves discrimination between figure and background by V1, V2 and V3 neurons , 1998, Nature.

[61]  W. Ridder,et al.  Suppression of contrast sensitivity during eyelid blinks , 1993, Vision Research.

[62]  V. Hömberg,et al.  Cerebral visual motion blindness: transitory akinetopsia induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of human area V5 , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Bullier.  Hierarchies of Cortical Areas , 2003 .

[65]  J. Bullier,et al.  Corticocortical connections between visual areas 17 and 18a of the rat studied in vitro: spatial and temporal organisation of functional synaptic responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  Bevil R. Conway,et al.  Neural Basis for a Powerful Static Motion Illusion , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  John R. Hotson,et al.  Tracing the timing of human analysis of motion and chromatic signals from occipital to temporo-parieto-occipital cortex: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Vision Research.

[68]  M Wagner,et al.  Fast visual evoked potential input into human area V5 , 1997, Neuroreport.

[69]  B. Mansouri,et al.  The extent of the dorsal extra-striate deficit in amblyopia , 2006, Vision Research.

[70]  R. Andersen,et al.  Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[71]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Two distinct modes of sensory processing observed in monkey primary visual cortex (V1) , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.