A randomized, clinical trial evaluating ready-made and custom spectacles delivered via a school-based screening program in China.

PURPOSE We sought to evaluate visual performance and satisfaction with ready-made spectacles (RMS) in Chinese school-aged children with uncorrected refractive error. DESIGN Randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS Junior high school students from urban Guangzhou, China, aged approximately 12 to 15 years with > or =1 diopter (D) of uncorrected spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error. Students were excluded with > or =2.00 D astigmatism, > or =2 D myopic anisometropia, and > or =1 D hyperopic anisometropia and ocular disease affecting vision. METHODS Refractive error was determined by cycloplegic subjective refraction. Students were randomly assigned to receive RMS or custom spectacles (CS) and assessed after 1 month of use. We required 175 students to complete in each arm to be able to measure a 15% difference in compliance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Compliance with spectacles lens wear, patterns of use, vision, symptoms, and perceived value. RESULTS Screening identified 965 of 4607 (20.9%) students with reduced distance vision; 212 of the 965 (22.0%) refused evaluation and 187 of the 965 (20.8%) had <1 D of SE refractive error. Sixty-one (6.3%) were referred for further evaluation and the remaining 495 (51.3%) participated. Social, demographic, and ocular parameters were similar in the 2 groups. Average SE refractive error was -2.57+/-1.31 (mean value +/- standard deviation [SD]). Spectacle vision (Snellen acuity, mean +/- SD) was worse with RMS in the eye with lower SE (20/25(-0.5)+/-0.9 lines vs 20/25(+1)+/-0.7 lines; P = 0.004) and higher SE (20/25(-2)+/-1.2 lines vs 20/25(+1)+/-0.8; P<0.001). There were no differences (P>0.05) in the rate of use (94.3% vs 92.2%), wearing to the 1-month visit (46.9% vs 51.5%), planned use (93.3% vs 93.7%), value (89.5% vs 91.7% "moderate or high value or most valued possession"), or symptoms (blur, 21.1% vs 19.4% [P = 0.8] and other symptoms [P>0.2]). CONCLUSIONS Although visual acuity was better with CS, no difference was found in acceptability in this population of students with predominantly simple myopic refractive error. This study supports the use of RMS in a school-based refractive services program, saving costs and improving the logistics of service delivery.

[1]  Jerry E Vincent.  Simple Spectacles for Adult Refugees on the Thailand–Burma Border , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  S. Resnikoff,et al.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[3]  M. He,et al.  Need and Challenges of Refractive Correction in Urban Chinese School Children , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  R. Baltussen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening and correcting refractive errors in school children in Africa, Asia, America and Europe. , 2009, Health policy.

[5]  H R Taylor,et al.  Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of “off the shelf” spectacles , 2001, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Jingjing Xu,et al.  Refractive error and visual impairment in urban children in southern china. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  G. Brian,et al.  Affordable ready‐made spectacles for use in blindness prevention programmes: setting standards of quality , 2006, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[8]  Michel Millodot,et al.  The possible effect of undercorrection on myopic progression in children , 2006, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[9]  N. Congdon,et al.  Factors associated with spectacle-wear compliance in school-aged Mexican children. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  H. Fledelius,et al.  PREVALENCES OF ASTIGMATISM AND ANISOMETROPIA IN ADULT DANES , 1984, Acta ophthalmologica.

[11]  K. Naidoo,et al.  Delivering refractive error services: primary eye care centres and outreach. , 2007, Community eye health.

[12]  N. Congdon,et al.  The association between refractive cutoffs for spectacle provision and visual improvement among school-aged children in South Africa , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[13]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Childhood blindness in the context of VISION 2020--the right to sight. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[14]  A D Negrel,et al.  Refractive Error Study in Children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey. , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Rupert R A Bourne,et al.  Correction of refractive error in the adult population of Bangladesh: meeting the unmet need. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  U. Raman,et al.  Community Eye Health , 2004 .

[17]  G. Brian,et al.  A public-private partnership to provide spectacles for Timor-Leste. , 2007, Community eye health.