Symbolism in California’s Early Market for Hybrid Electric Vehicles

This study explores the symbolic meanings being created, appropriated, and communicated by the owners of hybrid electric vehicles. As symbolic meanings are shown to be important to hybrid electric vehicle purchase and use, understanding the meanings, as well as their construction and communication, is essential for policy makers and others hoping to promote these new types of vehicles. Hybrid electric vehicles embody combinations of meanings that were previously unavailable from automobiles. Market observers who fail to recognize this struggle to explain why some people buy hybrid electric vehicles. They may characterize buyers as nai ¨ve about calculating payback on fuel economy, or dismiss owners as image-seeking environmentalists. This research belies such simplistic explanations. Through the telling and analysis of buyers’ own stories, this study takes a robust approach to understanding the creation and spread of new symbolic meanings in the automotive market. Data were collected in ethnographic interviews with hybrid electric vehicle owners in the California, and analyzed using methods based on semiotic theory. In particular, the study explores how widely recognized social meanings (denotations) are connected to more personal meanings (connotations) and the effect that both types of meanings have on vehicle purchase and use.

[1]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[2]  J. Aaker,et al.  Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[3]  Grant Mccracken.  The long interview , 1988 .

[4]  Linda Steg,et al.  INSTRUMENTAL-REASONED AND SYMBOLIC-AFFECTIVE MOTIVES FOR USING A MOTOR CAR , 2001 .

[5]  D. McAdams.  Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons , 1996 .

[6]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Using self-congruity and ideal congruity to predict purchase motivation , 1985 .

[7]  Mikael Hård,et al.  Cultural Politics in Action: Developing User Scripts in Relation to the Electric Vehicle , 2002 .

[8]  James J. Flink,et al.  The Automobile Age. , 1989 .

[9]  John S. McClure.  Semiotics: The Basics , 2004 .

[10]  P. Vanden Abeele,et al.  Consumer inferences and consumer preferences. The status of cognition and consciousness in consumer behavior theory , 1985 .

[11]  R. Barthes.  Elements of Semiology , 1967 .

[12]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Driving climate change , 2007 .

[13]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Demand for clean-fuel vehicles in California: A discrete-choice stated preference pilot project , 1993 .

[14]  Meh Lee-Gosselin,et al.  SCOPE AND POTENTIAL OF INTERACTIVE STATED RESPONSE DATA COLLECTION METHODS , 1996 .

[15]  N. Scott Cardell,et al.  Choice of smallest car by multi-vehicle households and the demand for electric vehicles , 1980 .

[16]  Bruce L. Stern,et al.  Self-Concept and Significant Others , 1971 .

[17]  K. Kurani,et al.  Car buyers and fuel economy , 2007 .

[18]  Ferdinand de Saussure.  Course in General Linguistics , 1916 .

[19]  T. J. Reynolds,et al.  Laddering theory, method, analysis, and interpretation. , 2001 .

[20]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-based Advertising Research , 1995 .

[21]  Mary K. Ericksen.  Using Self-congruity and Ideal Congruity to Predict Purchase Intention , 1997 .

[22]  Daniel Chandler,et al.  Semiotics: The Basics , 2001 .

[23]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  A Primer on Automobile Semiotics , 2006 .

[24]  Thomas S Turrentine,et al.  Narrative Self-Identity and Societal Goals: Automotive Fuel Economy and Global Warming Policy , 2007 .

[25]  E. Grubb,et al.  Perception of Self, Generalized Stereotypes, and Brand Selection , 1968 .

[26]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts: , 1981 .

[27]  John E. Calfee,et al.  ESTIMATING THE DEMAND FOR ELECTRIC AUTOMOBILES USING FULLY DISAGGREGATED PROBABILISTIC CHOICE ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[28]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts, and Product Concepts , 1981 .