Dynamic change of corporate environmental strategy: Rhetoric and reality

Although rhetoric involves political and symbolic posture, and does not always accurately represent reality, it plays an important role in the dynamic change process of environmental strategy. We first elaborate on the related concepts and develop frameworks to analyze corporate environmental strategy and its change. We report two case studies of Korean companies using the framework. Longitudinal case studies also provide additional implications for corporate environmental strategy in developing countries such as Korea. There is a gap between the rhetoric and reality of environmental strategy and it constantly changes over time depending on specific internal and external influences. The strength of external influences is a factor that determines whether the change is real or merely rhetorical. Internal organizational variables most likely affect the reality of environmental strategy. We show that the elaboration of rhetorical and realistic aspects of corporate environmentalism can bring out deeper insights and new theoretical developments. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[2]  William Keogh,et al.  Rhetorics and realities in new product development in the subsea oil industry , 1997 .

[3]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[4]  P. Shrivastava The Role of Corporations in Achieving Ecological Sustainability , 1995 .

[5]  Stephen Fineman,et al.  Fashioning the Environment , 2001 .

[6]  Tricia Vilkinas,et al.  Performance Determinants for Senior Managers: Rhetoric or Reality? , 1994 .

[7]  Richard MacLean MANAGER'S NOTEBOOK What's Your Strategy? Environmental strategies get obscured in a fog of politically correct rhetoric. , 2001 .

[8]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  MANAGING ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING , 1997 .

[9]  Naomi S. Soderstrom,et al.  Measuring corporate environmental performance , 1998 .

[10]  Ronald Begley,et al.  IS ISO 14000 WORTH IT , 1996 .

[11]  James D. Berkley,et al.  Beyond the Hype: Rediscovering the Essence of Management , 1992 .

[12]  Alok K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Corporate Strategies in Environmental Management , 1999 .

[13]  Kendall Roth,et al.  Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness , 2000 .

[14]  Tsai C. Kuo,et al.  Environmentally conscious design and manufacturing: A state-of-the-art survey , 1997 .

[15]  Mark J. Zbaracki The Rhetoric and Reality of Total Quality Management , 1998 .

[16]  A. Kieser Rhetoric and Myth in Management Fashion , 1997 .

[17]  William R. King,et al.  The impact of rhetorical strategies on innovation decisions: an experimental study , 2000 .

[18]  Andrew Lock,et al.  Theoretical Concept or Management Fashion? , 2000, Journal of Advertising Research.

[19]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  An international comparison of environmental management in operations: the impact of manufacturing flexibility in the U.S. and Germany , 1998 .

[21]  Eric Abrahamson Managerial Fads and Fashions: The Diffusion and Rejection of Innovations , 1991 .

[22]  Ad J. de Ron,et al.  Sustainable production: The ultimate result of a continuous improvement , 1998 .

[23]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions , 1998 .

[24]  Ken Kamoche Rhetoric, Ritualism, and Totemism in Human Resource Management , 1995 .

[25]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities , 1998 .

[26]  D. Rondinelli,et al.  Proactive corporate environmental management: A new industrial revolution , 1998 .

[27]  R. Klassen,et al.  The Impact of Environmental Technologies on Manufacturing Performance , 1999 .