A presynaptic mechanism accounts for the differential block of nicotinic synapses on sympathetic B and C neurons by d-tubocurarine

The effects of d-tubocurarine (dTC) on nicotinic synapses on sympathetic B and C neurons in the bullfrog were compared by recording trains of postganglionic compound action potentials (CAPs) at 0.5–20 Hz. Block by dTC was strongly use dependent in that the IC50 shifted almost 10-fold with increasing stimulus frequency. Maximum sensitivity to dTC occurred at 5 Hz in the B system and at 20 Hz in the C system. Recovery during posttrain periods was characterized by transient reduction of CAP amplitude in the B system and by transient enhancement of CAP amplitude in the C system. Thus, dTC distinguished between nicotinic synapses on the two cell types. The cell-specific effects of dTC could arise from differences in postsynaptic or presynaptic nicotinic receptors, or from differences in acetylcholine (ACh) release. We tested these possibilities using intracellular recording. Based on comparison with iontophoretic responses to ACh, changes in EPSP amplitude during repetitive stimulation in dTC could not be explained by altered postsynaptic sensitivity. The block of nicotinic receptors was further analyzed by recording synaptic currents. In B and C cells, 3 microM dTC competitively antagonized EPSC amplitude by 54% without any sign of open-channel block. In B cells, comparison of trains in normal Ringer and dTC revealed a constant fractional reduction in EPSC amplitude, thereby indicating that presynaptic nicotinic receptors do not influence release. In the C system, dTC had no effect on peptidergic EPSPs, thereby suggesting that presynaptic nicotinic receptors also do not influence peptide release. We conclude that the differential effects of dTC on nicotinic transmission are indirect consequences of differences in ACh release by preganglionic B and C neurons.

[1]  A. Mathie,et al.  Single-channel and whole-cell currents evoked by acetylcholine in dissociated sympathetic neurons of the rat , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  K. Koketsu,et al.  PRESYNAPTIC MUSCARINIC RECEPTORS INHIBITING ACTIVE ACETYLCHOLINE RELEASE IN THE BULLFROG SYMPATHETIC GANGLION , 1982, British journal of pharmacology.

[3]  J. Horn,et al.  Spinal origins of preganglionic B and C neurons that innervate paravertebral sympathetic ganglia nine and ten of the bullfrog , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  R. North,et al.  Single channels activated by acetylcholine in rat superior cervical ganglion. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  A. Vernallis,et al.  Neurons assemble acetylcholine receptors with as many as three kinds of subunits while maintaining subunit segregation among receptor subtypes , 1993, Neuron.

[6]  R. Parsons,et al.  Voltage clamp study of fast excitatory synaptic currents in bullfrog sympathetic ganglion cells , 1980, The Journal of general physiology.

[7]  P. Ascher,et al.  Studies on the mechanism of action of acetylcholine antagonists on rat parasympathetic ganglion cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  H. Rang,et al.  The channel‐blocking action of methonium compounds on rat submandibular ganglion cells , 1997, British journal of pharmacology.

[9]  R. Parsons,et al.  Kinetic analysis of atropine‐induced alterations in bullfrog ganglionic fast synaptic currents. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Colquhoun,et al.  THE ACTION OF GANGLIONIC BLOCKING DRUGS ON THE SYNAPTIC RESPONSES OF RAT SUBMANDIBULAR GANGLION CELLS , 1982, British journal of pharmacology.

[11]  J. Horn The integrative role of synaptic cotransmission in the bullfrog vasomotor C system: evidence for a synaptic gain hypothesis. , 1992, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[12]  K L Magleby,et al.  The effect of voltage on the time course of end‐plate currents , 1972, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  A. J. Harris,et al.  Differential chemosensitivity of synaptic and extrasynaptic areas on the neuronal surface membrane in parasympathetic neurons of the frog, tested by microapplication of acetylcholine , 1971, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  D. Rodbard,et al.  Simultaneous analysis of families of sigmoidal curves: application to bioassay, radioligand assay, and physiological dose-response curves. , 1978, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  YY Peng,et al.  Continuous repetitive stimuli are more effective than bursts for evoking LHRH release in bullfrog sympathetic ganglia , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Studies on sympathetic B and C neurons and patterns of pregnaglionic innervation. , 1965, Journal of cellular physiology.

[17]  J. Dodd,et al.  A reclassification of B and C neurones in the ninth and tenth paravertebral sympathetic ganglia of the bullfrog. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  B. L. Ginsborg On the presynaptic acetylcholine receptor in sympathetic ganglia of the frog , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  L. M. Marshall Different synaptic channel kinetics in sympathetic B and C neurons of the bullfrog , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[20]  Wilfrid Jänig,et al.  Characteristics of function-specific pathways in the sympathetic nervous system , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  K. Magleby,et al.  The effect of (+)‐tubocurarine on neuromuscular transmission during repetitive stimulation in the rat, mouse, and frog. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  S. Dryer,et al.  Analysis of quantal content and quantal conductance in two populations of neurons in the avian ciliary ganglion , 1987, Neuroscience.

[23]  D. A. Brown,et al.  Evidence against a Presynaptic Action of Acetylcholine during Ganglionic Transmission , 1970, Nature.

[24]  G. Koelle A Proposed Dual Neurohumoral Role of Acetylcholine: Its Functions at the Pre- and Post-Synaptic Sites , 1961, Nature.

[25]  L. Marshall,et al.  Presynaptic control of synaptic channel kinetics in sympathetic neurones , 1985, Nature.

[26]  D. Lipscombe,et al.  Nicotinic receptors of frog ganglia resemble pharmacologically those of skeletal muscle , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Berg,et al.  Coexpression of multiple acetylcholine receptor genes in neurons: quantification of transcripts during development , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[28]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Cholinergic receptors at sympathetic preganglionic nerve terminals , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  J. W. Goh,et al.  Pharmacological and physiological properties of the after‐hyperpolarization current of bullfrog ganglion neurones. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  K. Koketsu,et al.  Release of Acetylcholine from Sympathetic Preganglionic Nerve Terminals , 1967 .

[31]  P. Sargent,et al.  The diversity of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[32]  Y. Jan,et al.  Peptidergic transmission in sympathetic ganglia of the frog. , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[33]  B. Libet,et al.  Slow synaptic responses and excitability in sympathetic ganglia of the bullfrog. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  I. G. Marshall,et al.  Pre‐and post‐junctional effects of tubocurarine and other nicotinic antagonists during repetitive stimulation in the rat. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[35]  D Colquhoun,et al.  Conductance and kinetic properties of single nicotinic acetylcholine receptor channels in rat sympathetic neurones. , 1991, The Journal of physiology.

[36]  J. Horn,et al.  Neuropeptide Y mimics a non-adrenergic component of sympathetic vasoconstriction in the bullfrog. , 1990, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[37]  A. Brussaard,et al.  Functional contribution of neuronal AChR subunits revealed by antisense oligonucleotides. , 1991, Science.