Speech segmentation is adaptvie even in adulthood: Role of the linguistic environment

In this paper, we show that adult listeners who speak the same native language but live in different linguistic environments differ in their use of prosodic cues that signal word boundaries in the native language. Non-utterance-final word-final syllables have higher fundamental frequency in French. Adult native French listeners living in France or in the US completed an artificial-language segmentation task where fundamental frequency cued word-final boundaries (experimental). Other native French listeners living in France completed the corresponding task without prosodic cues (control). Results showed that France French listeners outperformed US French listeners and control French listeners, but US French listeners did not outperform control French listeners. The poorer performance of US French listeners is attributed to their regular exposure to (and thus interference from) English, a language where fundamental frequency signals wordinitial boundaries. This suggests speech segmentation is adaptive, with listeners tuning in to the prosody of their linguistic environment.

[1]  Evelyn P. Altenberg The perception of word boundaries in a second language , 2005 .

[2]  Mariapaola D'Imperio,et al.  Accentual Phrase Boundaries and Lexical Access in French , 2010 .

[3]  C. Fougeron,et al.  Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation , 2002 .

[4]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary , 1987 .

[5]  J. McQueen,et al.  Effects of first and second language on segmentation of non-native speech* , 2011, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[6]  J. Vroomen,et al.  The Roles of Word Stress and Vowel Harmony in Speech Segmentation , 1998 .

[7]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[8]  A. Cutler,et al.  Cross-language differences in cue use for speech segmentation. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Cynthia G. Clopper Frequency of Stress Patterns in English: A Computational Analysis , 2002 .

[10]  Sun-Ah Jun,et al.  A Phonological Model of French Intonation , 2000 .

[11]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[12]  Stéphanie Gaillard,et al.  Differential contribution of prosodic cues in the native and non-native segmentation of French speech , 2012 .

[13]  Pauline Welby,et al.  French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[14]  M. Beckman Stress And Non-Stress Accent , 1986 .

[15]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[16]  Sahyang Kim,et al.  THE USE OF PROSODIC CUES IN LEARNING NEW WORDS IN AN UNFAMILIAR LANGUAGE , 2012, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[17]  Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  Stratégie de segmentation prosodique : rôle des proéminences initiales et finales dans l’acquisition d’une langue artificielle , 2006 .

[18]  A. Weber,et al.  First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.