A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography--a signal-to-noise analysis.

Breast cancer may manifest as microcalcifications (microCs) in x-ray mammography. However, the detection and visualization of microCs are often obscured by the overlapping tissue structures. The dual-energy subtraction imaging technique offers an alternative approach for imaging and visualizing microCs. With this technique, separate high- and low-energy images are acquired and their differences are used to "cancel" out the background tissue structures. However, the subtraction process could increase the statistical noise level relative to the calcification contrast. Therefore, a key issue with the dual-energy subtraction imaging technique is to weigh the benefit of removing the cluttered background tissue structure over the drawback of reduced signal-to-noise ratio in the subtracted microC images. In this report, a theoretical framework for calculating the (quantum) noise in the subtraction images is developed and the numerical computations are described. We estimate the noise levels in the dual-energy subtraction signals under various imaging conditions, including the x-ray spectra, microC size, tissue composition, and breast thickness. The selection of imaging parameters is optimized to evaluate the feasibility of using a dual-energy subtraction technique for the improved detection and visualization of microCs. We present the results and discuss its dependence on imaging parameters.

[1]  G. Barnes,et al.  Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  S J Riederer,et al.  Spectral considerations for absorption-edge fluoroscopy. , 1977, Medical physics.

[3]  K Smigel,et al.  Breast cancer death rates decline for white women. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  P P Fatouros,et al.  Absorbed breast dose: dependence on radiographic modality and technique, and breast thickness. , 1986, Radiology.

[5]  J. S. Laughlin,et al.  Absorbed radiation dose in mammography. , 1979, Radiology.

[6]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[7]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[8]  A R Cowen,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography utilizing stimulated phosphor computed radiography. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  C E Metz,et al.  The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography. , 1976, Radiology.

[10]  J M Boone Color mammography. Image generation and receiver operating characteristic evaluation. , 1991, Investigative radiology.

[11]  E A Sickles,et al.  Mammographic detectability of breast microcalcifications. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  G S Shaber,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: a detector analysis. , 1990, Medical physics.

[13]  G T Barnes,et al.  An energy sensitive cassette for dual-energy mammography. , 1989, Medical physics.