Friendly, Appealing or Both?: Characterising User Experience in Sponsored Search Landing Pages

Many of today's websites have recognised the importance of mobile friendly pages to keep users engaged and to provide a satisfying user experience. However, next to the experience provided by the sites themselves, advertisements, when clicked, present users with landing pages that are not necessarily mobile friendly. We explore what type of features are able to characterise the mobile friendliness of sponsored search ad landing pages. To have a complete understanding of the mobile ad experience in terms of layout and visual appearance, we also explore the notion of the ad page aesthetic appeal. We design and collect annotations for both dimensions on a large set of ads, and find that mobile friendliness and aesthetics represent different notions. We perform a comprehensive study of the effectiveness of over 120 features on the tasks of friendliness and aesthetics prediction. We find that next to general page size, HTML, and resource usage based features, several features based on the visual composition of landing pages are important to determine mobile friendliness and aesthetics. We demonstrate the additional benefit of these various types of features by comparing against the mobile friendliness guidelines provided by W3C. Finally, we use our models to determine the state of landing page mobile friendliness and aesthetics on a large sample of advertisements of a major internet company.

[1]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[2]  Sergiy Vilkomir,et al.  Testing-as-a-Service for Mobile Applications: State-of-the-Art Survey , 2015 .

[3]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  An Image Is Worth More than a Thousand Favorites: Surfacing the Hidden Beauty of Flickr Pictures , 2015, ICWSM.

[4]  Masashi Nishiyama,et al.  Aesthetic quality classification of photographs based on color harmony , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[5]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[6]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach , 2006, ECCV.

[7]  Liqing Zhang,et al.  Saliency Detection: A Spectral Residual Approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  James Zijun Wang,et al.  RAPID: Rating Pictorial Aesthetics using Deep Learning , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[9]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Promoting Positive Post-Click Experience for In-Stream Yahoo Gemini Users , 2015, KDD.

[10]  D. Sculley,et al.  Predicting bounce rates in sponsored search advertisements , 2009, KDD.

[11]  Hila Becker,et al.  What happens after an ad click?: quantifying the impact of landing pages in web advertising , 2009, CIKM.

[12]  Dustin Hillard,et al.  A predictive model for advertiser value-per-click in sponsored search , 2013, WWW.

[13]  Allan Hanbury,et al.  Affective image classification using features inspired by psychology and art theory , 2010, ACM Multimedia.

[14]  Feng Qian,et al.  Characterizing resource usage for mobile web browsing , 2014, MobiSys.

[15]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[16]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[17]  Yong Li,et al.  Image Feature Learning for Cold Start Problem in Display Advertising , 2015, IJCAI.

[18]  Fabrizio Silvestri,et al.  Improving Post-Click User Engagement on Native Ads via Survival Analysis , 2016, WWW.

[19]  Diane Tang,et al.  Focusing on the Long-term: It's Good for Users and Business , 2015, KDD.

[20]  Yang Zhou,et al.  Multimedia features for click prediction of new ads in display advertising , 2012, KDD.

[21]  Rossano Schifanella,et al.  6 Seconds of Sound and Vision: Creativity in Micro-videos , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[22]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Like Partying? Your Face Says It All. Predicting the Ambiance of Places with Profile Pictures , 2015, ICWSM.

[23]  Yili Liu,et al.  Computational modeling and experimental investigation of effects of compositional elements on interface and design aesthetics , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[24]  Hila Becker,et al.  Context transfer in search advertising , 2009, SIGIR.

[25]  Mounia Lalmas,et al.  Measuring User Engagement , 2014, Measuring User Engagement.

[26]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness , 2013, CHI.

[27]  Jianxiong Xiao,et al.  What makes an image memorable? , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[28]  Ke Zhou,et al.  Predicting Pre-click Quality for Native Advertisements , 2016, WWW.

[29]  Dragomir Yankov,et al.  Categorization of display ads using image and landing page features , 2011, LDMTA '11.

[30]  Xiangyang Xue,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Interestingness of Videos , 2013, AAAI.

[31]  Yan Ke,et al.  The Design of High-Level Features for Photo Quality Assessment , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[32]  Haibin Liu,et al.  Characterizing Landing Pages in Sponsored Search , 2012, 2012 Eighth Latin American Web Congress.

[33]  Nishanth R. Sastry,et al.  Predicting Pinterest: Automating a Distributed Human Computation , 2015, WWW.

[34]  Raffay Hamid,et al.  What makes an image popular? , 2014, WWW.

[35]  Yejin Choi,et al.  Using landing pages for sponsored search ad selection , 2010, WWW '10.

[36]  Kiemute Oyibo,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Perception of Mobile Website Interfaces and the Influence of Culture , 2016, PPT@PERSUASIVE.

[37]  Ishani Chakraborty,et al.  Correlating low-level image statistics with users - rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages , 2009, CHI.