Quality check of wire-mesh sensor measurements in a vertical air/water flow

Abstract Extensive measurements were executed for a vertical upward air/water flow to generate a high-quality database for the development and validation of CFD-Codes for two-phase flows (e.g. for models on bubble forces or on coalescence and break-up). Thereto, in a pipe with a nominal diameter of 200 mm, the wire-mesh sensor technology was used. The present paper aims on the assessment of uncertainty caused by the experimental procedure and especially global deviations arising from the use of the wire-mesh sensor technology. Special attention was paid to the plausibility and accuracy of the data regarding the evolution of the vertical multiphase flow. In the result, a clear and consistent trend regarding their evolution with increasing distance from the position of the gas injection was found. Comparisons of the trend of time and cross-section averaged gas volume fraction along the pipe height with the theoretically expected values were carried out. From the measured radial profiles of the void fraction and the velocity of the gas phase, the superficial gas velocity at the wire-mesh sensor is integrated over the cross-section and compared with the set value from the test matrix. Thus, a general uncertainty analysis of the sensor data is possible.

[1]  R. S. Sanders,et al.  Bubble size in coalescence dominant regime of turbulent air–water flow through horizontal pipes , 2003 .

[2]  Akira Ohnuki,et al.  Experimental study on transition of flow pattern and phase distribution in upward air–water two-phase flow along a large vertical pipe , 2000 .

[3]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Ultrafast limited-angle-type x-ray tomography , 2007 .

[4]  Horst-Michael Prasser,et al.  Wire-mesh sensors for high-resolving two-phase flow studies at high pressures and temperatures , 2007 .

[5]  Mamoru Ishii,et al.  Interfacial Area Transport of Vertical Upward Bubbly Two-Phase Flow in an Annulus , 2003 .

[6]  H. Prasser,et al.  A new electrode-mesh tomograph for gas–liquid flows , 1998 .

[7]  Annalisa Manera,et al.  The multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility TOPFLOW: an overview on experimental capabilities, instrumentation and results , 2006 .

[8]  M. Shoukri,et al.  Bubble and liquid turbulence characteristics of bubbly flow in a large diameter vertical pipe , 2008 .

[9]  Eckhard Krepper,et al.  Evolution of the two-phase flow in a vertical tube—decomposition of gas fraction profiles according to bubble size classes using wire-mesh sensors , 2002 .

[10]  Martin Sommerfeld,et al.  An advanced LIF-PLV system for analysing the hydrodynamics in a laboratory bubble column at higher void fractions , 2002 .

[11]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  Evolution of the structure of a gas–liquid two-phase flow in a large vertical pipe , 2007 .

[12]  Ion Tiseanu,et al.  Comparison between wire-mesh sensor and ultra-fast X-ray tomograph for an air–water flow in a vertical pipe , 2005 .

[13]  Dirk Lucas,et al.  Air-water experiments in a vertical DN200-pipe , 2011 .

[14]  Robert F. Mudde,et al.  Bubble size effect on low liquid input drift–flux parameters , 2004 .

[15]  Santiago Laín,et al.  Experimental and numerical studies of the hydrodynamics in a bubble column , 1999 .

[16]  Frank-Peter Weiss,et al.  TOPFLOW : a new multipurpose thermalhydraulic test facility for the investigation of steady state and transient two phase flow phenomena , 2001 .