Scientific retreats with ‘speed dating’: networking to stimulate new interdisciplinary translational research collaborations and team science

To stimulate the formation of new interdisciplinary translational research teams and innovative pilot projects, the South Carolina Clinical and Translational Research (SCTR) Institute (South Carolina Clinical and Translational Science Award, CTSA) initiated biannual scientific retreats with ‘speed dating’ networking sessions. Retreat themes were prioritized based on the following criteria; cross-cutting topic, unmet medical need, generation of novel technologies and methodologies. Each retreat begins with an external keynote speaker followed by a series of brief research presentations by local researchers focused on the retreat theme, articulating potential areas for new collaborations. After each session of presentations, there is a 30 min scientific ‘speed dating’ period during which the presenters meet with interested attendees to exchange ideas and discuss collaborations. Retreat attendees are eligible to compete for pilot project funds on the topic of the retreat theme. The 10 retreats held have had a total of 1004 participants, resulted in 61 pilot projects with new interdisciplinary teams, and 14 funded projects. The retreat format has been a successful mechanism to stimulate novel interdisciplinary research teams and innovative translational research projects. Future retreats will continue to target topics of cross-cutting importance to biomedical and public health research.

[1]  Kara L Hall,et al.  The ecology of team science: understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[2]  J. Youtie,et al.  How interdisciplinary is nanotechnology? , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[3]  Mohammad H Rahbar,et al.  Evaluating Academic Scientists Collaborating in Team-Based Research: A Proposed Framework. , 2015, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  Joon-Oh Park,et al.  The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2011 .

[5]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Who collaborates successfully?: prior experience reduces collaboration barriers in distributed interdisciplinary research , 2008, CSCW.

[6]  Beth Baker.  The Science of Team Science An emerging field delves into the complexities of effective collaboration. , 2015 .

[7]  K. Boudreau,et al.  A Field Experiment on Search Costs and the Formation of Scientific Collaborations , 2014, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  Kevin C. Wooten,et al.  The Multidisciplinary Translational Team (MTT) Model for Training and Development of Translational Research Investigators , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[9]  David Eichmann,et al.  Research Networking Systems: The State of Adoption at Institutions Aiming to Augment Translational Research Infrastructure. , 2014, Journal of translational medicine & epidemiology.

[10]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Team Science , 2015 .

[11]  D. Luke,et al.  Breaking Down Silos: Mapping Growth of Cross‐Disciplinary Collaboration in a Translational Science Initiative , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[12]  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan,et al.  Social Network Analysis to Assess the Impact of the CTSA on Biomedical Research Grant Collaboration , 2015, Clinical and translational science.

[13]  John T. Slattery,et al.  The Road We Must Take: Multidisciplinary Team Science , 2010, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  Kara L. Hall,et al.  The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[15]  Richard N. Zare,et al.  Interdisciplinary Research: From Belief to Reality , 1999, Science.

[16]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[17]  Linda F. Samson,et al.  The Science of Team Science , 2013 .

[18]  Howard Gadlin,et al.  Collaboration & team science: a field guide , 2013 .

[19]  Onne Janssen,et al.  Joint Impact of Interdependence and Group Diversity on Innovation , 2003 .