Novel Determinants Describe Chaperonin Substrate Proteins

[1]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Chaperonin overexpression promotes genetic variation and enzyme evolution , 2009, Nature.

[2]  F. Hartl,et al.  Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo , 2009, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[3]  K. Willison,et al.  Development of free-energy-based models for chaperonin containing TCP-1 mediated folding of actin , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[4]  Alex Wong,et al.  Evolution of protein-coding genes in Drosophila. , 2008, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  D. Frishman,et al.  Protein abundance profiling of the Escherichia coli cytosol , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[6]  J. Kato,et al.  Construction of consecutive deletions of the Escherichia coli chromosome , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[7]  Ziheng Yang.  PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[8]  Dennis B. Troup,et al.  NCBI GEO: mining tens of millions of expression profiles—database and tools update , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[9]  Ben-Yang Liao,et al.  Impacts of gene essentiality, expression pattern, and gene compactness on the evolutionary rate of mammalian proteins. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  Frances H Arnold,et al.  Structural determinants of the rate of protein evolution in yeast. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[11]  Bernard R Brooks,et al.  Residues in substrate proteins that interact with GroEL in the capture process are buried in the native state. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  C. Wilke,et al.  A single determinant dominates the rate of yeast protein evolution. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Sheena E Radford,et al.  The Yin and Yang of protein folding , 2005, The FEBS journal.

[14]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.

[15]  C. Wilke,et al.  Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Functional genomic analysis of the rates of protein evolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Jianzhi Zhang,et al.  Significant impact of protein dispensability on the instantaneous rate of protein evolution. , 2005, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Identifying natural substrates for chaperonins using a sequence‐based approach , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[19]  L. Serrano,et al.  Prediction of sequence-dependent and mutational effects on the aggregation of peptides and proteins , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity , 2004, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  Susan Lindquist,et al.  Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90‐mediated genetic capacitance , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[22]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of Protein Folding This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Folding and Binding Edited Basic Concepts Perfect Funnel Landscapes and Common Features of Folding Mechanisms , 2022 .

[23]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Toward a protein profile of Escherichia coli: Comparison to its transcription profile , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Lennart Martens,et al.  Chromatographic Isolation of Methionine-containing Peptides for Gel-free Proteome Analysis , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[25]  Santiago F. Elena,et al.  Endosymbiotic bacteria: GroEL buffers against deleterious mutations , 2002, Nature.

[26]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation , 2002, Nature.

[27]  F. Hartl,et al.  Molecular Chaperones in the Cytosol: from Nascent Chain to Folded Protein , 2002, Science.

[28]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Dual Function of Protein Confinement in Chaperonin-Assisted Protein Folding , 2001, Cell.

[29]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Protein dispensability and rate of evolution , 2001, Nature.

[30]  C. Pál,et al.  Highly expressed genes in yeast evolve slowly. , 2001, Genetics.

[31]  I. Longden,et al.  EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[32]  E. Craig,et al.  Getting Newly Synthesized Proteins into Shape , 2000, Cell.

[33]  Susumu Goto,et al.  KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  Z. Yang,et al.  Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.

[35]  S. Lindquist,et al.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution , 1998, Nature.

[36]  A. Horwich,et al.  Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. , 1998, Annual review of biochemistry.

[37]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[38]  A. Horwich,et al.  GroEL‐Mediated protein folding , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[39]  Y. Kashi,et al.  Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release , 1994, Nature.

[40]  Yechezkel Kashi,et al.  GroEL-mediated protein folding proceeds by multiple rounds of binding and release of nonnative forms , 1994, Cell.

[41]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  S. B. Needleman,et al.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.