Dissecting the species–energy relationship

Environmental energy availability can explain much of the spatial variation in species richness. Such species–energy relationships encompass a diverse range of forms, and there is intense debate concerning which of these predominate, and the factors promoting this diversity. Despite this there has been relatively little investigation of whether the form, and relative strength, of species–energy relationships varies with (i) the currency of energy availability that is used, and (ii) the ecological characteristics of the constituent species. Such investigations can, however, shed light on the causal mechanisms underlying species–energy relationships. We illustrate this using the British breeding avifauna. The strength of the species–energy relationship is dependent on the energy metric used, with species richness being more closely correlated with temperature than the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, which is a strong correlate of net primary productivity. We find little evidence, however, for the thermoregulatory load hypothesis that high temperatures enable individuals to invest in growth and reproduction, rather than thermoregulation, increasing population sizes that buffer species from extinction. High levels of productive energy may also elevate population size, which is related to extinction risk by a negative decelerating function. Therefore, the rarest species should exhibit the strongest species–energy relationship. We find evidence to the contrary, together with little support for suggestions that high-energy availability elevates species richness by increasing the numbers of specialists or predators.

[1]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[2]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters , 2005 .

[3]  H. Akaike.  INFORMATION THEORY AS AN EXTENSION OF THE MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD , 1973 .

[4]  E. Pianka.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity , 1989 .

[5]  K. Gaston,et al.  Biodiversity: An Introduction , 1998 .

[6]  T. Kitzberger,et al.  Environmental correlates of mammal species richness in South America: effects of spatial structure, taxonomy and geographic range , 2004 .

[7]  M. Maslin,et al.  Sudden climate transitions during the Quaternary , 1999 .

[8]  J. Crame,et al.  Taxonomic diversity gradients through geological time , 2001 .

[9]  K. Gaston,et al.  Species‐energy relationships at the macroecological scale: a review of the mechanisms , 2005, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[10]  K. Gaston.  Macroecology and people , 2004 .

[11]  J. T.R. Sharrock,et al.  The Atlas of Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland , 1980 .

[12]  R. Lande.  Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[13]  K. N. Rabenold.  A Reversed Latitudinal Diversity Gradient in Avian Communities of Eastern Deciduous Forests , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Ecography 25: 601 -- 615, 2002 , 2022 .

[15]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[16]  NEW MITOCHONDRIAL DNA DATA AFFIRM THE IMPORTANCE OF PLEISTOCENE SPECIATION IN NORTH AMERICAN BIRDS , 2004, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Lev R Ginzburg,et al.  Rules of thumb for judging ecological theories. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  J. Gamon,et al.  Response of NDVI, biomass, and ecosystem gas exchange to long-term warming and fertilization in wet sedge tundra , 2003, Oecologia.

[19]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Spatial patterns of range contraction in British breeding birds , 2001 .

[20]  J. Damuth,et al.  Population density and body size in mammals , 1981, Nature.

[21]  K. Gaston,et al.  Explanations of commonness and rarity in British breeding birds: separating resource use and resource availability , 2000 .

[22]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[23]  P. Legendre.  Spatial Autocorrelation: Trouble or New Paradigm? , 1993 .

[24]  F. C. James.  Geographic Size Variation in Birds and Its Relationship to Climate , 1970 .

[25]  M. Kaspari,et al.  Energy gradients and the geographic distribution of local ant diversity , 2004, Oecologia.

[26]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time. , 1996 .

[27]  Katherine L. Gross,et al.  WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY , 2001 .

[28]  R. Rae,et al.  The distribution and habitats of crossbills Loxia spp. in Britain, with special reference to the Scottish Crossbill Loxia scotica , 2002 .

[29]  Jerald B. Johnson,et al.  Model selection in ecology and evolution. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  G. E. Hutchinson,et al.  Homage to Santa Rosalia or Why Are There So Many Kinds of Animals? , 1959, The American Naturalist.

[31]  M. Wilson,et al.  Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The birds of the Western Palearctic: 3. Waders to gulls , 1984 .

[32]  K. N. Rabenold.  Latitudinal Gradients in Avian Species Diversity and the Role of Long-Distance Migration , 1993 .

[33]  N. Elkins.  Species richness and the energy theory , 1989, Nature.

[34]  Marc L. Imhoff,et al.  Global patterns in human consumption of net primary production , 2004, Nature.

[35]  Gareth Jones,et al.  The new atlas of breeding birds in Britain and Ireland 1988-1991 , 1993 .

[36]  K. Gaston,et al.  Rarity, commonness, and patterns of species richness: the mammals of Mexico , 2004 .

[37]  K. Gaston,et al.  People, energy and avian species richness , 2005 .

[38]  M. Huston.  A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[39]  K. Rohde.  Latitudinal gradients in species diversity: the search for the primary cause , 1992 .

[40]  K. Gaston,et al.  Pattern and Process in Macroecology , 2000 .

[41]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2003 .

[42]  D. Post,et al.  The long and short of food-chain length , 2002 .

[43]  John Whittaker,et al.  Rules of Thumb , 1996 .

[44]  K. Gaston.  Global patterns in biodiversity , 2000, Nature.

[45]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geographic Range Size and Determinants of Avian Species Richness , 2002, Science.

[46]  K Roy,et al.  Marine latitudinal diversity gradients: tests of causal hypotheses. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Kullback-Leibler information as a basis for strong inference in ecological studies , 2001 .

[48]  P. Abrams.  Monotonic or unimodal diversity-productivity gradients : what does competition theory predict? , 1995 .

[49]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Relative contribution of abundant and rare species to species–energy relationships , 2005, Biology Letters.

[50]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  A test of multiple hypotheses for the species richness gradient of South American owls , 2004, Oecologia.

[51]  G. C. Johns,et al.  Speciation durations and Pleistocene effects on vertebrate phylogeography , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[52]  Jeremy J. D. Greenwood,et al.  Bird diversity and environmental gradients in Britain: a test of the species–energy hypothesis , 2000 .

[53]  R. Littell.  SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[54]  J. Lawton,et al.  Relationships between abundances and life histories of British birds , 1996 .

[55]  Jack J. Lennon,et al.  British bird species distributions and the energy theory , 1988, Nature.

[56]  S. Fretwell.  Food chain dynamics: the central theory of ecology? , 1987 .

[57]  D. Vázquez,et al.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Niche Breadth: Concepts and Evidence , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[58]  Richard Field,et al.  ENERGY, WATER, AND BROAD‐SCALE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERNS OF SPECIES RICHNESS , 2003 .

[59]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Relations between Abundance, Body Size and Species Number in British Birds and Mammals , 1996 .

[60]  James H. Brown.  Two Decades of Homage to Santa Rosalia: Toward a General Theory of Diversity , 1981 .

[61]  R. Gregory,et al.  Macroecological patterns in British breeding birds: covariation of species’geographical range sizes at differing spatial scales , 1998 .

[62]  M. Willig,et al.  The Relationship Between Productivity and Species Richness , 1999 .

[63]  J. Kerr,et al.  Lepidopteran richness patterns in North America , 1998 .

[64]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production , 2002, Science.

[65]  K. Gaston,et al.  Does energy availability influence classical patterns of spatial variation in exotic species richness , 2005 .

[66]  James H. Brown,et al.  Domains of Diversity , 2004, Science.

[67]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[68]  B. C. Patten,et al.  7 – Niche Quantification and the Concept of Niche Pattern , 1972 .

[69]  J. Greenwood,et al.  The roles of extinction and colonization in generating species–energy relationships , 2005 .

[70]  K. Gaston,et al.  Abundance‐range size relationships of breeding and wintering birds in Britain: a comparative analysis , 1997 .

[71]  Jack J. Lennon,et al.  Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology , 2000 .

[72]  Richard Field,et al.  Predictions and tests of climate‐based hypotheses of broad‐scale variation in taxonomic richness , 2004 .

[73]  D. Currie.  Energy and Large-Scale Patterns of Animal- and Plant-Species Richness , 1991, The American Naturalist.