The Performance of Wood and Tile Roofing Assemblies Exposed to Continuous Firebrand Assault.

The performance of tile roofing assemblies as well as untreated cedar shake roofing assemblies exposed to continuous firebrand showers were compared. Specifically, experiments were conducted for two types of concrete tile roofing assemblies (flat and profiled), one type of terracotta tile roofing assembly (flat), and an untreated (without any fire retardant) cedar shake roofing assembly. The design of the roofing assemblies were based on construction guidelines in the USA. The duration of the firebrand flux was fixed at 20 minutes, and the wind speed was varied from 6 m/s to 9 m/s. These wind speeds were chosen to be able to compare roofing assembly performance to similar assemblies exposed to a batch-feed firebrand generator which had limited duration of firebrand exposure (6 min). The average firebrand mass flux that arrived at the surface of the roofing assemblies was 0.3 g/m2s Results indicated that for the untreated cedar shake assemblies, ignition occurred easily from the firebrand assault, and this type of roofing assembly generated their own firebrands after ignition. To attempt to quantify the degree of penetration, the number of firebrands that penetrated the tile roofing assemblies, and deposited onto the underlayment/counter-batten system was counted as function of wind speed for each assembly. Firebrand penetration was observed, even for the flat tile assemblies. It is believed that these are the first-ever experiments described in the peer-reviewed literature to expose wood and tile roofing experiments to continuous wind-driven firebrand showers.

[1]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  The size and mass distribution of firebrands collected from ignited building components exposed to wind , 2013 .

[2]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Enabling the study of structure vulnerabilities to ignition from wind driven firebrand showers: A summary of experimental results , 2012 .

[3]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Quantifying the vulnerabilities of ceramic tile roofing assemblies to ignition during a firebrand attack , 2010 .

[4]  S. L. Manzello,et al.  The wildland-urban interface fire problem - current approaches and research needs , 2010 .

[5]  Sayaka Suzuki,et al.  Firebrand Production from Building Components Fitted with Siding Treatments. , 2016, Fire safety journal.

[6]  Samuel L. Manzello.  The Performance of Concrete Tile and Terracotta Tile Roofing Assemblies Exposed to Wind-Driven Firebrand Showers , 2013 .

[7]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Summary of workshop for fire structure interaction and urban and wildland-urban interface (WUI) Fires–operation Tomodachi–fire research , 2013 .

[8]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Ignition of Mulch Beds Exposed to Continuous Wind-Driven Firebrand Showers , 2015 .

[9]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Experimentally Simulating Wind Driven Firebrand Showers in Wildland-urban Interface (WUI) Fires: Overview of the NIST Firebrand Generator (NIST Dragon) Technology , 2013 .

[10]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Summary of Workshop on Structure Ignition in Wildland- Urban Interface (WUI) Fires , 2015 .

[11]  Carlos Sánchez Tarifa,et al.  On the flight pahts and lifetimes of burning particles of wood , 1965 .

[12]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Firebrands generated from a full-scale structure burning under well-controlled laboratory conditions , 2014 .

[13]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Ignition of Wood Fencing Assemblies Exposed to Continuous Wind-Driven Firebrand Showers , 2016 .

[14]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Enabling the Investigation of Structure Vulnerabilities to Wind- Driven Firebrand Showers in Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires , 2014 .

[15]  Samuel L. Manzello,et al.  Characterizing Firebrand Exposure from Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) Fires: Results from the 2007 Angora Fire , 2014 .

[16]  Pedro Reszka,et al.  The Great Valparaiso Fire and Fire Safety Management in Chile , 2015 .

[17]  Samuel L. Manzello.  Special Issue on Wildland–Urban Interface (WUI) Fires , 2014 .