Cytoskeletal Mechanics and Cellular Mechanotransduction: A Molecular Perspective

Cells are highly complex structures with unique physiology and biomechanical properties. A multiscale multiphysics methodology is required to properly understand the intrinsically coupled mechanobiology of the cell and describe its macroscopic response to externally applied stresses. This indeed is both a challenge and an excellent research opportunity. This chapter reviews the latest advancements in this field by bringing together the recent experimental and theoretical studies on the cytoskeletal rheology and mechanics as well as the dynamic response of the cell to environmental stimuli. The experimental observations along with computational approaches used to study the mechanical properties of the individual constituents of the cytoskeleton are first presented. Various computational models are then discussed ranging from discrete filamentous models to continuum level models developed to capture the highly dynamic and constantly changing properties of the cells to external and internal stimuli. Finally, the concept of cellular mechanotransduction is discussed as an essential function of the cell wherein the cytoskeleton plays a key role.

[1]  S. Winder,et al.  Actin-binding proteins , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[2]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic structure of the actin: DNase I complex , 1990, Nature.

[3]  R. Buxbaum,et al.  Tension and compression in the cytoskeleton of PC-12 neurites. II: Quantitative measurements. , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  T. Kreis,et al.  Guidebook to the extracellular matrix, anchor, and adhesion proteins , 1999 .

[5]  P. Janmey,et al.  Elasticity of semiflexible biopolymer networks. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[6]  F. Oosawa,et al.  Polarized fluorescence from epsilon-ADP incorporated into F-actin in a myosin-free single fiber: conformation of F-actin and changes induced in it by heavy meromyosin. , 1978, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  R Busse,et al.  Crucial role of endothelium in the vasodilator response to increased flow in vivo. , 1986, Hypertension.

[8]  P. Janmey,et al.  Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels , 2004, Nature.

[9]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Thermal fluctuations of grafted microtubules provide evidence of a length-dependent persistence length , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  D. Boal,et al.  Simulations of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton at large deformation. II. Micropipette aspiration. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[11]  K. Oegema,et al.  Anillin and the septins promote asymmetric ingression of the cytokinetic furrow. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[12]  Javad Golji,et al.  Molecular Mechanics of the α-Actinin Rod Domain: Bending, Torsional, and Extensional Behavior , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Laurent Kreplak,et al.  Biomechanical properties of intermediate filaments: from tissues to single filaments and back , 2007, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[14]  D J Mooney,et al.  Control of microtubule assembly by extracellular matrix and externally applied strain. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[15]  J. Squire,et al.  A novel approach to the structural analysis of partially decorated actin based filaments , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[16]  M. Schliwa,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules measured with the use of optical tweezers. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[17]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Filamins as integrators of cell mechanics and signalling , 2001, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[18]  H. Isambert,et al.  Flexibility of actin filaments derived from thermal fluctuations. Effect of bound nucleotide, phalloidin, and muscle regulatory proteins , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Shin'ichi Ishiwata,et al.  Temperature dependence of the flexural rigidity of single microtubules. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[20]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Mechanical relaxation of the hair bundle mediates adaptation in mechanoelectrical transduction by the bullfrog's saccular hair cell. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  C. Brangwynne,et al.  Nonequilibrium microtubule fluctuations in a model cytoskeleton. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[22]  Ning Wang,et al.  Mechanics of vimentin intermediate filaments , 2004, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[23]  Miroslav Zivkovic,et al.  A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  D Groswasser,et al.  Active gels : dynamics of patterning and self-organization , 2006 .

[25]  S Chien,et al.  Shear stress induces spatial reorganization of the endothelial cell cytoskeleton. , 1998, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[26]  Falko Ziebert,et al.  Rheological and structural properties of dilute active filament solutions. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  D. Weitz,et al.  An active biopolymer network controlled by molecular motors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Elasticity of stiff polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[29]  M. Magnasco,et al.  Measurement of the persistence length of polymerized actin using fluorescence microscopy. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[30]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Direct measurement of stiffness of single actin filaments with and without tropomyosin by in vitro nanomanipulation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  R. Yasuda,et al.  Direct measurement of the torsional rigidity of single actin filaments. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  C. Brangwynne,et al.  Mechanical Response of Cytoskeletal Networks , 2008 .

[33]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Direct observation of motion of single F-actin filaments in the presence of myosin , 1984, Nature.

[34]  Hideo Tashiro,et al.  Flexural rigidity of individual microtubules measured by a buckling force with optical traps. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[35]  P. Chacón,et al.  Changes in Microtubule Protofilament Number Induced by Taxol Binding to an Easily Accessible Site , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  R D Kamm,et al.  Force-induced focal adhesion translocation: effects of force amplitude and frequency. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[37]  H Tashiro,et al.  Buckling of a single microtubule by optical trapping forces: direct measurement of microtubule rigidity. , 1995, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[38]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  Donald E Ingber,et al.  Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction , 2003, Annals of medicine.

[40]  K. Holmes Structural biology: Actin in a twist , 2009, Nature.

[41]  Christoph F Schmidt,et al.  Elastic response, buckling, and instability of microtubules under radial indentation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[42]  A. Carlsson Contractile stress generation by actomyosin gels. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  Bernd Nilius,et al.  Shear stress induced membrane currents and calcium transients in human vascular endothelial cells , 1992, Pflügers Archiv.

[44]  U Aebi,et al.  Exploring the mechanical behavior of single intermediate filaments. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  M. Yamazaki,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of single filamin A (ABP‐280) molecules detected by atomic force microscopy , 2001, FEBS letters.

[46]  Preethi L. Chandran,et al.  Averaged implicit hydrodynamic model of semiflexible filaments. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[47]  Giovanni Dietler,et al.  Techniques for measuring microtubule stiffness , 2007 .

[48]  M. Yamazaki,et al.  Section: Cytoskeletal Proteins; Mechanical response of single filamin A (ABP-280) molecules and its role in the actin cytoskeleton , 2002, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[49]  Matthew Mirigian,et al.  Mechanics of microtubules. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[50]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Allostery of actin filaments: molecular dynamics simulations and coarse-grained analysis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction : diverse perspectives from molecules to tissues , 2009 .

[52]  E H Burger,et al.  Microgravity and bone cell mechanosensitivity. , 1998, Bone.

[53]  Roger D. Kamm,et al.  Cytoskeletal mechanics : models and measurements , 2006 .

[54]  D. DeRosier,et al.  Changes in the organization of actin filaments in the stereocilia of noise-damaged lizard cochleae , 1982, Hearing Research.

[55]  T van Dillen,et al.  Alternative explanation of stiffening in cross-linked semiflexible networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[56]  C. Turner,et al.  Focal adhesions: transmembrane junctions between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. , 1988, Annual review of cell biology.

[57]  G Kaley,et al.  Role of shear stress and endothelial prostaglandins in flow- and viscosity-induced dilation of arterioles in vitro. , 1993, Circulation research.

[58]  Yuichiro Maéda,et al.  The nature of the globular- to fibrous-actin transition , 2009, Nature.

[59]  J. Joanny,et al.  Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[60]  Taylor,et al.  In vitro models of tail contraction and cytoplasmic streaming in amoeboid cells , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[61]  F. Yin,et al.  Mechanical properties of actin stress fibers in living cells. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[62]  Marileen Dogterom,et al.  A bending mode analysis for growing microtubules: evidence for a velocity-dependent rigidity. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[63]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[64]  M. Mofrad,et al.  Molecular mechanics of filamin's rod domain. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[65]  M. Yamazaki,et al.  Mechanical response of single filamin A (ABP-280) molecules and its role in the actin cytoskeleton. , 2002, Journal of muscle research and cell motility.

[66]  Erwin Frey,et al.  Stiff polymers, foams, and fiber networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[67]  Richard T. Lee,et al.  A three-dimensional viscoelastic model for cell deformation with experimental verification. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[68]  F. Oosawa Actin-actin bond strength and the conformational change of F-actin. , 1977, Biorheology.

[69]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Microtubule gliding and cross-linked microtubule networks on micropillar interfaces. , 2005, Nano letters.

[70]  Andrew D. Bicek,et al.  Analysis of microtubule curvature. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[71]  Marion Ghibaudo,et al.  Rigidity-driven growth and migration of epithelial cells on microstructured anisotropic substrates , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  C. Picu,et al.  Modeling the mechanics of semiflexible biopolymer networks: Non-affine deformation and presence of long-range correlations , 2012 .

[73]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[74]  U. Aebi,et al.  Exploring the mechanical properties of single vimentin intermediate filaments by atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[75]  Pieter Rein ten Wolde,et al.  Differential Affinity and Catalytic Activity of CheZ in E. coli Chemotaxis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[76]  F. Oosawa,et al.  Electronmicroscopic investigation of the flexibility of F-actin. , 1977, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[77]  A C BURTON,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED CELL MEMBRANE. I. MEMBRANE STIFFNESS AND INTRACELLULAR PRESSURE. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[78]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[79]  E. Meyhöfer,et al.  Directional loading of the kinesin motor molecule as it buckles a microtubule. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[80]  Ueli Aebi,et al.  A Correlative Analysis of Actin Filament Assembly, Structure, and Dynamics , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[81]  J. Käs,et al.  Direct Measurement of the Wave-Vector-Dependent Bending Stiffness of Freely Flickering Actin Filaments , 1993 .

[82]  Sebastian Rammensee,et al.  Negative normal stress in semiflexible biopolymer gels. , 2007, Nature materials.

[83]  Donald E. Ingber,et al.  Jcb: Article Introduction , 2002 .

[84]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology probes length scale dependent rheology. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[85]  Yuichiro Maéda,et al.  The nature of the globular- to fibrous-actin transition , 2009, Nature.

[86]  Andreas Hoenger,et al.  Visualisation of the actin cytoskeleton by cryo-electron microscopy. , 2002, Journal of cell science.

[87]  Junru Wu,et al.  Actin filament mechanics in the laser trap , 1997, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[88]  Boris Martinac,et al.  Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[89]  D. Smith,et al.  Active fluidization of polymer networks through molecular motors , 2002, Nature.

[90]  F. Sbrana,et al.  Role for stress fiber contraction in surface tension development and stretch-activated channel regulation in C2C12 myoblasts. , 2008, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[91]  Edward H. Egelman,et al.  The structure of F-actin , 1985, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[92]  R. Rand,et al.  MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF THE RED CELL MEMBRANE. II. VISCOELASTIC BREAKDOWN OF THE MEMBRANE. , 1964, Biophysical journal.

[93]  D A Weitz,et al.  Two-point microrheology of inhomogeneous soft materials. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[94]  Robert D. Goldman,et al.  Intermediate filaments mediate cytoskeletal crosstalk , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[95]  Christian Riekel,et al.  The mechanical properties of hydrated intermediate filaments: insights from hagfish slime threads. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[96]  D. Weitz,et al.  Elastic Behavior of Cross-Linked and Bundled Actin Networks , 2004, Science.

[97]  R M Nerem,et al.  Vascular endothelial morphology as an indicator of the pattern of blood flow. , 1981, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[98]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Scaling of nonaffine deformation in random semiflexible fiber networks. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[99]  S. Edwards,et al.  The Theory of Polymer Dynamics , 1986 .

[100]  C. Otey,et al.  Dynamics of α‐actinin in focal adhesions and stress fibers visualized with α‐actinin‐green fluorescent protein , 2001 .

[101]  T C Lubensky,et al.  Microrheology, stress fluctuations, and active behavior of living cells. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[102]  F. Grosveld,et al.  Atherosclerotic Lesion Size and Vulnerability Are Determined by Patterns of Fluid Shear Stress , 2006, Circulation.

[103]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Softening of the actin cytoskeleton by inhibition of myosin II , 2008, Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology.

[104]  J Langowski,et al.  Assessing the flexibility of intermediate filaments by atomic force microscopy. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[105]  J. Simeon,et al.  Creep function of a single living cell. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[106]  L Mahadevan,et al.  A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[107]  D. DeRosier,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of F-actin, thin filaments and decorated thin filaments. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[108]  D A Weitz,et al.  Microrheology of entangled F-actin solutions. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[109]  Fpt Frank Baaijens,et al.  Multiphasic models in cell mechanics , 2006 .

[110]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Atomic model of the actin filament , 1990, Nature.

[111]  A C Maggs,et al.  Analysis of microtubule rigidity using hydrodynamic flow and thermal fluctuations. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[112]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  Simulation of F-actin filaments of several microns. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[113]  D. DeRosier,et al.  Reconstruction of three-dimensional images from electron micrographs of structures with helical symmetry. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[114]  J. Sanger,et al.  Stress fiber and cleavage furrow formation in living cells microinjected with fluorescently labeled alpha-actinin. , 1987, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[115]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Mechanotransduction involving multimodular proteins: converting force into biochemical signals. , 2006, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[116]  Mohammad R. K. Mofrad,et al.  Rheology of the Cytoskeleton , 2009 .

[117]  J. Howard,et al.  Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[118]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[119]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Effect of fiber orientation on the non-affine deformation of random fiber networks , 2009 .

[120]  L R Sauvage,et al.  Fibronectin and F-actin redistribution in cultured endothelial cells exposed to shear stress. , 1985, Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology.

[121]  J. Lowy,et al.  The structure of F-actin and of actin filaments isolated from muscle , 1963 .

[122]  A. Matus,et al.  Domains of Neuronal Microtubule-associated Proteins and Flexural Rigidity of Microtubules , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[123]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Sub-piconewton force fluctuations of actomyosin in vitro , 1991, Nature.

[124]  Jan Lammerding,et al.  Mechanotransduction gone awry , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[125]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Heterogeneous long-range correlated deformation of semiflexible random fiber networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[126]  E. Perozo Gating prokaryotic mechanosensitive channels , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[127]  David A Weitz,et al.  Bending dynamics of fluctuating biopolymers probed by automated high-resolution filament tracking. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[128]  Torsten Wittmann,et al.  The spindle: a dynamic assembly of microtubules and motors , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[129]  T D Pollard,et al.  The interaction of Arp2/3 complex with actin: nucleation, high affinity pointed end capping, and formation of branching networks of filaments. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[130]  A. Ajdari,et al.  Viscoelasticity of solutions of motile polymers. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[131]  Gerald H Pollack,et al.  Mechanics of F-actin characterized with microfabricated cantilevers. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[132]  Christoph F Schmidt,et al.  Leveraging single protein polymers to measure flexural rigidity. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[133]  E. Egelman,et al.  A conformational change in the actin subunit can change the flexibility of the actin filament. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[134]  K. Ewert,et al.  Synchrotron X-ray diffraction study of microtubules buckling and bundling under osmotic stress: a probe of interprotofilament interactions. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[135]  H. Huxley X-ray analysis and the problem of muscle , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[136]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[137]  F. MacKintosh,et al.  Deformation and collapse of microtubules on the nanometer scale. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[138]  Preethi L. Chandran,et al.  Rods-on-string idealization captures semiflexible filament dynamics. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[139]  Preethi L. Chandran,et al.  Band-like Stress Fiber Propagation in a Continuum and Implications for Myosin Contractile Stresses , 2009 .

[140]  Daniel A. Fletcher,et al.  Reversible stress softening of actin networks , 2007, Nature.

[141]  R. C. Picu,et al.  Long-range correlations of elastic fields in semi-flexible fiber networks , 2010 .

[142]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  How the ear's works work: mechanoelectrical transduction and amplification by hair cells. , 2005, Comptes rendus biologies.

[143]  Jim Pfaendtner,et al.  Structure and dynamics of the actin filament. , 2010, Journal of molecular biology.

[144]  F C MacKintosh,et al.  Distinct regimes of elastic response and deformation modes of cross-linked cytoskeletal and semiflexible polymer networks. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[145]  E. Egelman,et al.  New insights into actin filament dynamics. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[146]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[147]  H. Huxley,et al.  Electron microscope studies of the organisation of the filaments in striated muscle. , 1953, Biochimica et biophysica acta.