Representation and solution of decision problems using sequential decision diagrams

In this paper we introduce a new graph, the sequential decision diagram, to aid in modeling formulation, and solution of sequential decision problems under uncertainty. While as compact as an influence diagram, the sequential diagram captures the asymmetric and sequential aspects of decision problems as effectively as decision trees. We show that a unified framework consisting of a sequential diagram, an influence diagram, and a common formulation table for the problem's data, suffices for compact and consistent representation, economical formulation, and efficient solution of (asymmetric) decision problems. In addition to asymmetry, the framework exploits other sources of computational efficiency, such as conditional independence and value function decomposition, making it also useful in evaluating dynamic-programming problems. The formulation table and recursive algorithm can be readily implemented in computers for solving large-scale problems. Examples are provided to illustrate the methodology in both asymmetric and symmetric cases.

[1]  J. Pratt RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[2]  R. Howard,et al.  Risk-Sensitive Markov Decision Processes , 1972 .

[3]  Joseph A Tatman,et al.  Decision Processes In Influence Diagrams: Formulation and Analysis , 1985 .

[4]  Ross D. Shachter Evaluating Influence Diagrams , 1986, Oper. Res..

[5]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Decision analysis: practice and promise , 1988 .

[6]  Jim Q. Smith Influence diagrams for Bayesian decision analysis , 1989 .

[7]  William A. Miller,et al.  A comparison of approaches and implementations for automating decision analysis , 1990 .

[8]  Ross D. Shachter,et al.  Dynamic programming and influence diagrams , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[9]  Ross D. Shachter An ordered examination of influence diagrams , 1990, Networks.

[10]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  An Overview of Methods for Applied Decision Analysis , 1992 .

[11]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  Valuation-Based Systems for Bayesian Decision Analysis , 1992, Oper. Res..

[12]  James E. Smith,et al.  Structuring Conditional Relationships in Influence Diagrams , 1993, Oper. Res..

[13]  Craig W. Kirkwood An algebraic approach to formulating and solving large models for sequential decisions under uncertainty , 1993 .

[14]  Kneale T. Marshall,et al.  Decision making and forecasting , 1995 .

[15]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .