Fukunaga-Koontz feature transformation for statistical structural damage detection and hierarchical neuro-fuzzy damage localisation

Abstract Considering jointly damage sensitive features (DSFs) of signals recorded by multiple sensors, applying advanced transformations to these DSFs and assessing systematically their contribution to damage detectability and localisation can significantly enhance the performance of structural health monitoring systems. This philosophy is explored here for partial autocorrelation coefficients (PACCs) of acceleration responses. They are interrogated with the help of the linear discriminant analysis based on the Fukunaga-Koontz transformation using datasets of the healthy and selected reference damage states. Then, a simple but efficient fast forward selection procedure is applied to rank the DSF components with respect to statistical distance measures specialised for either damage detection or localisation. For the damage detection task, the optimal feature subsets are identified based on the statistical hypothesis testing. For damage localisation, a hierarchical neuro-fuzzy tool is developed that uses the DSF ranking to establish its own optimal architecture. The proposed approaches are evaluated experimentally on data from non-destructively simulated damage in a laboratory scale wind turbine blade. The results support our claim of being able to enhance damage detectability and localisation performance by transforming and optimally selecting DSFs. It is demonstrated that the optimally selected PACCs from multiple sensors or their Fukunaga-Koontz transformed versions can not only improve the detectability of damage via statistical hypothesis testing but also increase the accuracy of damage localisation when used as inputs into a hierarchical neuro-fuzzy network. Furthermore, the computational effort of employing these advanced soft computing models for damage localisation can be significantly reduced by using transformed DSFs.

[1]  M. H. Quenouille Approximate Tests of Correlation in Time‐Series , 1949 .

[2]  Steven Kay,et al.  Modern Spectral Estimation: Theory and Application , 1988 .

[3]  José Rodellar,et al.  Signal‐based nonlinear modelling for damage assessment under variable temperature conditions by means of acousto‐ultrasonics , 2015 .

[4]  María Isabel Blanco The economics of wind energy , 2009 .

[5]  Mohd. Zaki Nuawi,et al.  Ultrasonic health monitoring in structural engineering: buildings and bridges , 2016 .

[6]  Mengbao Fan,et al.  Automatic classification of eddy current signals based on kernel methods , 2009 .

[7]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Application of statistical monitoring using latent-variable techniques for detection of faults in sensor networks , 2014 .

[8]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[9]  Terence Sim,et al.  Discriminant Subspace Analysis: A Fukunaga-Koontz Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Kung-Sik Chan,et al.  Time Series Analysis: With Applications in R , 2010 .

[11]  Branislav Titurus,et al.  Regularization in model updating , 2008 .

[12]  Yasunori Miyamori,et al.  Assessment of vibration-based damage identification techniques using localized excitation source , 2013 .

[13]  James Hensman,et al.  Natural computing for mechanical systems research: A tutorial overview , 2011 .

[14]  Mustafa Arafa,et al.  Finite element model updating approach to damage identification in beams using particle swarm optimization , 2013 .

[15]  Arturo Garcia-Perez,et al.  MUSIC‐ANN Analysis for Locating Structural Damages in a Truss‐Type Structure by Means of Vibrations , 2012, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[16]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control , 1986 .

[17]  Keith Worden,et al.  An introduction to structural health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Mustafa Gul,et al.  Damage Assessment with Ambient Vibration Data Using a Novel Time Series Analysis Methodology , 2011 .

[19]  E. Peter Carden,et al.  Vibration Based Condition Monitoring: A Review , 2004 .

[20]  Gang Liu,et al.  Localization of nonlinear damage using state-space-based predictions under stochastic excitation , 2014 .

[21]  Spilios D. Fassois,et al.  A functional model based statistical time series method for vibration based damage detection, localization, and magnitude estimation , 2013 .

[22]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Classification of damage in structural systems using time series analysis and supervised and unsupervised pattern recognition techniques , 2010, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[23]  David P. Thambiratnam,et al.  Structural damage detection method using frequency response functions , 2014 .

[24]  Sylvain Arlot,et al.  A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection , 2009, 0907.4728.

[25]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Optimal selection of autoregressive model coefficients for early damage detectability with an application to wind turbine blades , 2016 .

[26]  P. Rathish Kumar,et al.  Detection and localization of small damages in a real bridge by local excitation using piezoelectric actuators , 2012 .

[27]  Sez Atamturktur,et al.  Feature Assimilation for Vibration Based Damage Detection , 2013 .

[28]  K. Krishnan Nair,et al.  Time Series Based Structural Damage Detection Algorithm Using Gaussian Mixtures , 2007 .

[29]  Antolino Gallego,et al.  Vibration Tests in CFRP Plates for Damage Detection via Non-Parametric Signal Analysis , 2012 .

[30]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Application of the Karhunen-Loève Expansion to Feature Selection and Ordering , 1970, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[31]  Jyrki Kullaa,et al.  DAMAGE DETECTION OF THE Z24 BRIDGE USING CONTROL CHARTS , 2003 .

[32]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[33]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1971 .

[34]  Hojjat Adeli,et al.  Signal Processing Techniques for Vibration-Based Health Monitoring of Smart Structures , 2016 .

[35]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[36]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[37]  Qiao Hu,et al.  Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on multiple ANFIS combination with GAs , 2007 .

[38]  Hao Zhou,et al.  Structure damage detection based on random forest recursive feature elimination , 2014 .

[39]  Xiaoming Huo A statistical analysis of Fukunaga-Koontz transform , 2004, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[40]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  A study of two unsupervised data driven statistical methodologies for detecting and classifying damages in structural health monitoring , 2013 .

[41]  Michael I Friswell,et al.  Damage identification using inverse methods , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[42]  Binbin Li,et al.  An algorithm for damage localization in steel truss structures: Numerical simulation and experimental validation , 2013 .

[43]  Patrice Mégret,et al.  Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors toward Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Materials: Challenges and Solutions , 2014, Sensors.

[44]  Chiwoo Park,et al.  Aggressive Data Reduction for Damage Detection in Structural Health Monitoring , 2010 .

[45]  Jung-Ryul Lee,et al.  Structural health monitoring for a wind turbine system: a review of damage detection methods , 2008 .

[46]  Mehrisadat Makki Alamdari,et al.  Damage localization based on symbolic time series analysis , 2015 .

[47]  S. R. Olsen,et al.  An in situ rapid heat–quench cell for small-angle neutron scattering , 2008 .

[48]  Hanqing Lu,et al.  Solving the small sample size problem of LDA , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[49]  Aditi Chattopadhyay,et al.  Low-velocity impact damage monitoring of a sandwich composite wing , 2013 .

[50]  Liu Meie,et al.  液晶エラストマー片持梁の光‐熱‐機械的駆動の曲げとスナップ動力学 , 2014 .

[51]  Keith Worden,et al.  Features for damage detection with insensitivity to environmental and operational variations , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[52]  Graeme Manson,et al.  Advanced Feature Selection for Simplified Pattern Recognition within the Damage Identification Framework , 2010 .

[53]  Pizhong Qiao,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[54]  Akira Mita,et al.  Localized Damage Detection of Structures Subject to Multiple Ambient Excitations Using Two Distance Measures for Autoregressive Models , 2009 .

[55]  David E. Booth,et al.  Multivariate statistical inference and applications , 1997 .

[56]  Gangbing Song,et al.  A review of damage detection methods for wind turbine blades , 2015 .

[57]  Laurent Mevel,et al.  Statistical decision making for damage localization with stochastic load vectors , 2013 .

[58]  S.J.S. Hakim and H. Abdul Razak,et al.  Frequency Response Function-based Structural Damage Identification using Artificial Neural Networks-a Review , 2014 .

[59]  Biswajit Basu,et al.  ASDAH: An automated structural change detection algorithm based on the Hilbert–Huang transform , 2014 .

[60]  Akira Mita,et al.  Applicability of mode-based damage assessment methods to severely damaged steel building , 2012, Smart Structures.

[61]  Anirban Guha,et al.  Damage identification in aluminum beams using support vector machine: Numerical and experimental studies , 2016 .

[62]  Keith Worden,et al.  A Non‐linear Manifold Strategy for SHM Approaches , 2015 .

[63]  Chuen-Tsai Sun,et al.  Neuro-fuzzy And Soft Computing: A Computational Approach To Learning And Machine Intelligence [Books in Brief] , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[64]  J. C. Marín,et al.  Study of fatigue damage in wind turbine blades , 2009 .

[65]  D. Bernal Flexibility-Based Damage Localization from Stochastic Realization Results , 2006 .

[66]  Gaëtan Kerschen,et al.  Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - Part II: local PCA for non-linear cases , 2005 .

[67]  Xin Liu,et al.  Electromagnetic Imaging Methods for Nondestructive Evaluation Applications , 2011, Sensors.

[68]  F. M. Jensen,et al.  Structural testing and numerical simulation of a 34 m composite wind turbine blade , 2006 .

[69]  David J. Hand,et al.  ROC Curves for Continuous Data , 2009 .

[70]  T. Jayakumar,et al.  Infrared thermography for condition monitoring – A review , 2013 .

[71]  Andrea Zucchelli,et al.  Damage assessment based on general signal correlation: Application for delamination diagnosis in composite structures , 2015 .

[72]  Sabbah Ataya,et al.  Damages of wind turbine blade trailing edge: Forms, location, and root causes , 2013 .

[73]  Piotr Omenzetter,et al.  Particle Swarm Optimization with Sequential Niche Technique for Dynamic Finite Element Model Updating , 2015, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[74]  Martin Brown,et al.  High dimensional neurofuzzy systems: overcoming the curse of dimensionality , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems..

[75]  Ulrike Grömping,et al.  Optimal Experimental Design with R , 2019 .

[76]  Luis Eduardo Mujica,et al.  Feature Selection - Extraction Methods Based on PCA and Mutual Information to Improve Damage Detection Problem in Offshore Wind Turbines , 2013 .