Facilitation of contrast detection in near-peripheral vision

Foveal detection of a Gabor patch (target) is facilitated by collinear, displaced high-contrast flankers. Polat and Sagi reported that the same phenomenon occurred in the periphery, but no data were presented [Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91 (1994) 1206]. Others have found no facilitation in a limited number of conditions tested. To resolve this apparent conflict, we measured lateral facilitation in the near-periphery using a range of stimulus parameters. We found facilitation for a range of target-flanker distances for peripheral eccentricities up to 6 degrees , but the magnitude of the effect was less than found in central vision. Facilitation varied across subjects and with spatial frequency. Flanker contrast had no effect over the range evaluated (10-80%). Equal facilitation was found for two global arrangements of the stimulus pattern. Facilitation was found using a temporal, but not a spatial two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, accounting for the different results among previous studies. This finding supports previous indications of the role of attention in altering such facilitation. The value of facilitation from lateral interactions for persons with central vision impairment, who have to shift their attention to a peripheral locus constantly, needs to be examined.

[1]  U. Polat.  Functional architecture of long-range perceptual interactions. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[2]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[3]  T. Wiesel.  Receptive fields of ganglion cells in the cat's retina , 1960, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[5]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[6]  J. Nelson,et al.  Intracortical facilitation among co-oriented, co-axially aligned simple cells in cat striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  D Swift,et al.  The use of VisionWorks in visual psychophysics research. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  STANLEY A. KLEIN,et al.  The Adjacent Pixel Nonlinearity: Problems and Solutions , 1996, Vision Research.

[9]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[10]  G. Westheimer.  Is peripheral visual acuity susceptible to perceptual learning in the adult? , 2001, Vision Research.

[11]  U. Polat,et al.  The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  M. J. Morgan,et al.  Contrast detection facilitation by spatially separated targets and inducers , 1995, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[14]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Spatial integration and cortical dynamics. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  G. Mitchison,et al.  Long axons within the striate cortex: their distribution, orientation, and patterns of connection. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Eli Peli,et al.  Lateral Interactions in Peripheral Vision , 2003 .

[17]  D. Levi,et al.  End stopping and length tuning in psychophysical spatial filters. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[19]  E Peli,et al.  Contrast sensitivity to patch stimuli: effects of spatial bandwidth and temporal presentation. , 1993, Spatial vision.

[20]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  Accurate control of contrast on microcomputer displays , 1991, Vision Research.

[21]  L Stark,et al.  Study of eccentric fixation with secondary visual feedback. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[22]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast detection and near-threshold discrimination in human vision , 1981, Vision Research.

[23]  Valerie Townsend,et al.  Voluntary Attention in Peripheral Vision and its Effects on Acuity and Differential Thresholds , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  G. Sperling,et al.  Object spatial frequencies, retinal spatial frequencies, noise, and the efficiency of letter discrimination , 1991, Vision Research.

[25]  E. Peli,et al.  Copyright © Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Image Enhancement for the Visually Impaired Simulations and Experimental Results , 2022 .

[26]  U. Polat,et al.  Neurophysiological Evidence for Contrast Dependent Long-range Facilitation and Suppression in the Human Visual Cortex , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  J. M. Foley,et al.  Contrast masking in human vision. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[28]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[29]  U Polat,et al.  Spatial interactions in human vision: from near to far via experience-dependent cascades of connections. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Legge.  Spatial frequency masking in human vision: binocular interactions. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[32]  L. Arend,et al.  Reading with a macular scotoma. I. Retinal location of scotoma and fixation area. , 1986, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[33]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Enhanced sensitivity for peripherally‐presented collinearly‐aligned stimulus elements: contour detection or spatial summation? , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[35]  E. Peli,et al.  Lateral interactions: size does matter , 2002, Vision Research.

[36]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Interactions between spatial frequency channels , 1978, Vision Research.

[37]  W. Charman,et al.  Off-axis image quality in the human eye , 1981, Vision Research.

[38]  E Peli,et al.  Luminance artifacts of cathode-ray tube displays for vision research. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[39]  J. Rovamo,et al.  Cortical magnification factor predicts the photopic contrast sensitivity of peripheral vision , 1978, Nature.

[40]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[41]  H. Jones,et al.  Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities , 1995, Nature.

[42]  M Stemmler,et al.  Lateral interactions in primary visual cortex: a model bridging physiology and psychophysics. , 1995, Science.

[43]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: Parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys , 1995, Neuron.

[44]  Jon Driver,et al.  Lateral interactions between targets and flankers in low-level vision depend on attention to the flankers , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  E. Peli,et al.  FLANKER SIZE AFFECTS VISUAL LATERAL INTERACTIONS , 2002 .

[46]  D. Levi,et al.  Spatial facilitation predicted with end-stopped spatial filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[47]  R. F. Hess,et al.  The contrast sensitivity gradient across the human visual field: With emphasis on the low spatial frequency range , 1989, Vision Research.