International comparisons and trends in external quality assurance of higher education: Commonality or diversity?

The paper explores international comparisons ofthe extent of commonality or diversity in themain national external quality assuranceframeworks for higher education. It has beensuggested, from an European survey, that thereare common features in national qualityassurance frameworks (van Vught andWesterheijden (Quality Management and QualityAssurance in European Higher Education: Methodsand Mechanisms) 1993; Luxembourg, Commission ofthe European Communities, Education TrainingYouth). The paper extends the survey, tappingother comparative reports.These comparisons show that a `general model'of external quality assurance does notuniversally apply, but that most elements of itdo apply in most countries. We conclude thatthe `general model' provides a starting pointfrom which to map deviations. In each country,there may be specific additions of elements oromissions from the model, but more usuallythere are modifications or extensions ofelements. These variations are determined bypracticalities, the size of the highereducation sector, the rigidity/flexibility ofthe legal expression of quality assurance (orthe absence of enshrinement in law), and thestage of development from state control of thesector. Some additions to the `general model'are suggested.The paper also considers efforts to produce aninternational scheme for external qualityassurance of higher education, and theapplicability of the `general model' to thetransfer of quality assurance frameworks fromcountry to country.