Digital elevation data for estimation of potential wetness in ridged fields—Comparison of two different methods

The aim of this study was to develop, adjust and test two different methods for the estimation of drainage area and potential wetness in ridged fields. The methods were applied to a gridded digital elevation model (DEM) of a potato field in central Sweden. Elevation data were registered by a global positioning system (GPS) receiver. A high-precision real time kinematic (RTK) system was used to record positions both horizontally and vertically. The study can be divided into four parts. First, we present the two different methods of estimating the drainage area and potential wetness. The potential wetness index used is 1n(a/tan beta), which is directly related to drainage area. Second, we constructed a high-accuracy DEM based on GPS-measured elevation points. We then modelled the GPS errors and the sampling errors in the DEM. Finally, we used a Monte Carlo simulation to test differences between the two methods of estimating the drainage area and potential wetness. The wetness index for the new method, which takes ridges into account, differs both statistically and visually from the first method, which does not incorporate ridges. The new method, incorporating ridges, is thus strongly recommended for hydrological modelling in ridged agricultural fields. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  A quasi-dynamic wetness index for characterizing the spatial distribution of zones of surface saturation and , 1994 .

[2]  Gregory J. McCabe,et al.  Comparison of Single and Multiple Flow Direction Algorithms for Computing Topographic Parameters in TOPMODEL , 1995 .

[3]  David M. Mark,et al.  Part 4: Mathematical, Algorithmic and Data Structure Issues: Automated Detection Of Drainage Networks From Digital Elevation Models , 1984 .

[4]  David Betaille,et al.  High-precision application of GPS in the field of real-time equipment positioning , 1997 .

[5]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  Critical levels of SO2 - uncertainty and relationships to Regional Forest Decline , 2000 .

[6]  T. G. Freeman,et al.  Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid , 1991 .

[7]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  A. J. Ciha Slope Position and Grain Yield of Soft White Winter Wheat1 , 1984 .

[9]  Chris Rizos,et al.  Stochastic assessment of GPS carrier phase measurements for precise static relative positioning , 2002 .

[10]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  Estimation of the Stochastic Model for Long- Baseline Kinematic GPS Applications , 2001 .

[11]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  Effect of Landscape Position on Soil Water and Corn Silage Yield , 1993 .

[12]  P. Holmgren Multiple flow direction algorithms for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: An empirical evaluation , 1994 .

[13]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[14]  Qiming Zhou,et al.  THEORETICAL ESTIMATION OF FLOW ACCUMULATION FROM A GRID-BASED DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL ∗ , 1997 .

[15]  Johannes Ledolter,et al.  Statistical methods for forecasting , 1983 .

[16]  James Brasington,et al.  Interactions between model predictions, parameters and DTM scales for TOPMODEL , 1998 .

[17]  K. Beven,et al.  The in(a/tan/β) index:how to calculate it and how to use it within the topmodel framework , 1995 .

[18]  D. J. Allerton,et al.  Book Review: GPS theory and practice. Second Edition, HOFFMANNWELLENHOFF B., LICHTENEGGER H. and COLLINS J., 1993, 326 pp., Springer, £31.00 pb, ISBN 3-211-82477-4 , 1995 .

[19]  P. Pilesjö,et al.  Approaches to spatially distributed hydrological modelling in a GIS environment , 2002 .

[20]  R. Haining Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences , 1990 .

[21]  Lars Eklundh,et al.  Rapid Generation of Digital Elevation Models from Topographic Maps , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[22]  E. Brigham,et al.  The fast Fourier transform and its applications , 1988 .

[23]  D. T. Lewis,et al.  Soil Properties Associated with Landscape Position , 1993 .

[24]  S. Walsh,et al.  Estimation of soil parameters for assessing potential wetness: Comparison of model responses through GIS , 1996 .

[25]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[26]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[27]  D. K. Cassel,et al.  Effect of Erosion and Landscape Position on the Productivity of Piedmont Soils , 1985 .

[28]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[29]  W. H. Wischmeier Use and misuse of the universal soil loss equation. , 1976 .

[30]  K. Beven,et al.  THE PREDICTION OF HILLSLOPE FLOW PATHS FOR DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELLING USING DIGITAL TERRAIN MODELS , 1991 .

[31]  L. Band Topographic Partition of Watersheds with Digital Elevation Models , 1986 .

[32]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Error Propagation in Environmental Modelling with GIS , 1998 .