A method for increasing depth of field during droplet imaging

The measurement of water drops using direct optical imaging involves a tradeoff between the camera depth of field and the accuracy of the measured droplet size. A large depth of field increases the length of that portion of the optical axis that is in focus. However, since drops closer to the camera appear larger than those farther away, increasing the depth of field also increases errors in the measured drop size unless a priori knowledge exists concerning the location of the drop along the optical axis. Herein a method is presented for ascertaining drop location using a single camera. The method uses a characteristic of the droplet image which is observed when droplets are illuminated from behind. Once the location of the droplet is obtained, the appropriate magnification ratio is applied, permitting an accurate droplet size measurement. This method has been tested on glass spheres of various size. The relevance of this work to precipitation science is discussed.

[1]  Robert F. Adler,et al.  A Proposed Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Satellite , 1988 .

[2]  A. Waldvogel,et al.  Comments on “Some Observations on the Joss-Waldvogel Rainfall Disdrometer” , 1977 .

[3]  Roland List,et al.  Collision, Coalescence and Breakup of Raindrops. Part I: Experimentally Established Coalescence Efficiencies and Fragment Size Distributions in Breakup , 1982 .

[4]  Karen Andsager,et al.  Laboratory Measurements of Axis Ratios for Large Raindrops , 1999 .

[5]  Ali Tokay,et al.  A field study of small raindrop oscillations , 1991 .

[6]  Roland List,et al.  Collision, Coalescence and Breakup of Raindrops. Part II: Parameterization of Fragment Size Distributions , 1982 .

[7]  Francis Arthur Jenkins,et al.  Fundamentals of Optics , 1976 .

[8]  M. Ishii,et al.  Isokinetic sampling probe and image processing system for droplet size measurement in two-phase flow , 1995 .

[9]  D L Bartley,et al.  Light scattering from deformed droplets and droplets with inclusions. I. Experimental results. , 2000, Applied optics.

[10]  R. C. Srivastava Size Distribution of Raindrops Generated by their Breakup and Coalescence , 1971 .

[11]  Sandra E. Yuter,et al.  Measurements of Raindrop Size Distributions over the Pacific Warm Pool and Implications for Z-R Relations , 1997 .

[12]  Yuichi Murai,et al.  Three-dimensional measurement of void fraction in a bubble plume using statistic stereoscopic image processing , 2001 .

[13]  V. Chandrasekar,et al.  Axis ratios and oscillations of raindrops , 1988 .

[14]  Harry T. Ochs,et al.  Natural oscillations of small raindrops , 1989, Nature.

[15]  J. Joss,et al.  Ein Spektrograph für Niederschlagstropfen mit automatischer Auswertung , 1967 .

[16]  A. Tonazzini,et al.  Drop size distribution in sprays by image processing , 1990 .

[17]  E Hirst,et al.  Light Scattering from Deformed Droplets and Droplets with Inclusions. II. Theoretical Treatment. , 2000, Applied optics.

[18]  Norman Chigier,et al.  Drop size and velocity instrumentation , 1983 .

[19]  D. Zrnic,et al.  Doppler Radar and Weather Observations , 1984 .

[20]  Alexander V. Ryzhkov,et al.  Drop Size Distributions Measured by a 2D Video Disdrometer: Comparison with Dual-Polarization Radar Data , 2001 .

[21]  K. Beard,et al.  A field study of raindrop oscillations. Part I: Observation of size spectra and evaluation of oscillation causes , 1996 .