PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico

"This document synthesizes the findings contained in a series of reports prepared by IFPRI for PROGRESA between November 1998 and November 2000... PROGRESA is one of the major programs of the Mexican government aimed at developing the human capital of poor households. Targeting its benefits directly to the population in extreme poverty in rural areas, PROGRESA aims to alleviate current and future poverty levels through cash transfers to mothers in households.... One of the most important contributions of IFPRI's evaluation of PROGRESA has been the continuation of the program in spite of the historic change in the government of Mexico in the 2000 elections. The overwhelming (and unprecedented) evidence that a poverty alleviation program shows strong signs of having a significant impact on the welfare and human capital investment of poor rural families in Mexico has contributed to the decision of the Fox administration to continue with the program and to expand its coverage in the poor urban areas of the country after some improvements in the design of the program.... The majority of the improvements in the design of PROGRESA (renamed Oportunidades by the Fox administration) were based on findings of the evaluation of PROGRESA that revealed areas of needed improvements in some of the structural components and the operation of the program... Yet in spite of these improvements in the program, the evaluation findings suggest that some issues remain to be resolved." from Text

[1]  E. Duflo.  Grandmothers and Graddaughters: Old Age Pension and Intra-Household Allocation in South Africa , 2000 .

[2]  Robert J. Willis,et al.  A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  D. Coady,et al.  A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS OF THE WELFARE IMPACT OF PROGRESA TRANSFERS , 2000 .

[4]  J. Heckman,et al.  The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs , 1999 .

[5]  P. Schultz.  IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON SCHOOL ATTENDANCE RATES IN THE SAMPLED POPULATION , 2000 .

[6]  T. Schultz.  SCHOOL SUBSIDIES FOR THE POOR: EVALUATING A MEXICAN STRATEGY FOR REDUCING POVERTY , 2001 .

[7]  J. Rivera,et al.  Development, Production, and Quality Control of Nutritional Supplements for a National Supplementation Programme in Mexico , 2000 .

[8]  T. Paul,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON SCHOOL ENROLLMENTS , 2000 .

[9]  J. Rivera,et al.  Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation of the Nutrition Component of the Mexican Social Programme (PROGRESA) , 2000 .

[10]  S. Handa,et al.  Poverty, inequality, and spillover in Mexico's education, health, and nutrition program , 2001 .

[11]  T. Bergstrom.  A survey of theories of the family , 1993 .

[12]  E. Skoufias.  Market wages, family composition and the time allocation of children in agricultural households , 1994 .

[13]  J. Knowles,et al.  Household Income and Child Schooling in Vietnam , 1999 .

[14]  Hanan G. Jacoby,et al.  Risk, Financial Markets, and Human Capital in a Developing Country , 1997 .

[15]  M. Ruel,et al.  AN OPERATIONS EVALUATION OF PROGRESA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF BENEFICIARIES, PORMOTORAS, SCHOOL DIRECTORS AND HEALTH STAFF: FINAL REPORT , 2000 .

[16]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Progressing Through Progresa: An Impact Assessment of a School Subsidy Experiment , 2001 .

[17]  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON CONSUMPTION : A FINAL REPORT , 2000 .

[18]  Gary S. Becker,et al.  Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  P. Gertler.  Do Conditional Cash Transfers Improve Child Health? Evidence from PROGRESA’s Control Randomized Experiment. , 2004, The American economic review.

[20]  Quy-Toan Do,et al.  Conditional Cash Transfers and the Equity-Efficiency Debate , 2004 .

[21]  E. Duflo.  Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment , 2000 .

[22]  J. Baker.  Evaluating the Impact of Development Projects on Poverty: A Handbook for Practitioners , 2000 .

[23]  M. Adato,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON WOMEN'S STATUS AND INTRAHOUSEHOLD RELATIONS , 2000 .

[24]  Laura B. Rawlings,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs: Lessons from Latin America , 2003 .

[25]  E. Skoufias.  Using Shadow Wages to Estimate Labor Supply of Agricultural Households , 1994 .

[26]  Santiago Levy.  La pobreza en mexico , 1993 .

[27]  J. Valadez.  Monitoring and Evaluating Social Programs in Developing Countries: A Handbook for Policymakers, Managers, and Researchers , 1995 .

[28]  J. Hahn,et al.  IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS WITH A REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY DESIGN , 2001 .

[29]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Governmental interventions and household behavior in a developing country : Anticipating the unanticipated consequences of social programs , 1982 .

[30]  Paul J. Gertler,et al.  Using Randomized Control Designs in Evaluating Social Sector Programs in Developing Countries , 1994 .

[31]  M. Rosenzweig.  Human Capital, Population Growth and Economic Development: Beyond Correlations , 1988 .

[32]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  International Food Policy Research Institute Randomness in the Experimental Samples of Progresa (education, Health, and Nutrition Program) , 2001 .

[33]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Assessing the Case for Social Experiments , 1995 .

[34]  David M. Murray,et al.  Design and Analysis of Group- Randomized Trials , 1998 .

[35]  Mark R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Estimating a Household Production Function: Heterogeneity, the Demand for Health Inputs, and Their Effects on Birth Weight , 1983, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  D. Coady.  THE APPLICATION OF SOCIAL COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO THE EVALUATION OF PROGRESA , 2000 .

[37]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  Fertility, schooling, and the economic contribution of children in rural India: an econometric analysis. , 1977, Econometrica : journal of the Econometric Society.

[38]  M. Grosh.  Administering Targeted Social Programs in Latin America: From Platitudes to Practice , 1994 .

[39]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation , 1991 .

[40]  Iliana Yaschine.  The Changing Anti‐Poverty Agenda: What Can the Mexican Case Tell Us? , 1999 .

[41]  Emmanuel Skoufias,et al.  Conditional Cash Transfers and Their Impact on Child Work and Schooling: Evidence from the PROGRESA Program in Mexico , 2001 .

[42]  F. Ellis.  Intrahousehold Resource Allocation in Developing Countries: Methods, Models, and Policy , 1997 .

[43]  J. Hoddinott,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON COMMUNITY SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS , 2000 .

[44]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON ACHIEVEMENT TEST SCORES IN THE FIRST YEAR , 2000 .

[45]  M. Ruel,et al.  AN OPERATIONS EVALUATION OF PROGRESA FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF BENEFICIARIES, PROMOTORAS, SCHOOL DIRECTORS, AND HEALTH STAFF , 2000 .

[46]  N. Kakwani.  Statistical inference in the measurement of poverty , 1993 .

[47]  M. Adato.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON COMMUNITY SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS , 2000 .

[48]  Emmanuel Skoufias,et al.  THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON WORK, LEISURE, AND TIME ALLOCATION , 2000 .

[49]  M. Ravallion.  The Mystery of the Vanishing Benefits: Ms. Speedy Analyst's Introduction to Evaluation , 1999 .

[50]  Emmanuel Skoufias,et al.  An Evaluation of the Performance of Regression Discontinuity Design on Progresa , 2004 .

[51]  S. Hoffman.  A Treatise on the Family , 2000 .

[52]  Hanan G. Jacoby,et al.  Testing Theories of Consumption Behavior Using Information on Aggregate Shocks: Income Seasonality and Rainfall in Rural India , 1998 .