Classification of cardiotocographic records by neural networks

Antepartum fetal monitoring based on the classical cardiotocography (CTG) is a noninvasive and low-price tool for checking fetal status. Its introduction in the clinical routine limited the occurrence of fetal problems leading to a reduction of the precocious child mortality. Nevertheless very poor indications on fetal pathologies can be inferred from the actual CTG analysis methods, either they consist of the clinician eye inspection or of automatic algorithms. A relevant amount of this unsatisfactory performance resides on the weakness of methods used for classifying fetal conditions and generate a risk alarm during pregnancy. In the paper three neural classifiers are proposed to discriminate among fetal behavioral states and among normal and pathological fetal conditions, on the basis of CTG recordings. All classifiers are fed by indexes extracted from fetal heart rate signal. Results show very promising performance towards the prediction of fetal outcomes on the set of collected FHR signals.

[1]  J. M. Swartjes,et al.  Computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate: 1. Baseline determination. , 1990, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[2]  G S Dawes,et al.  Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum , 1996, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[3]  H. Geijn 2 Developments in CTG analysis , 1996 .

[4]  J. Bernardes,et al.  Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis , 1998, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  G S Dawes,et al.  System 8000: Computerized antenatal FHR analysis , 1991, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[6]  J. Parer,et al.  Validity of mathematical methods of quantitating fetal heart rate variability. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  K J Dalton,et al.  Baseline: a computer method of calculating baseline in fetal heart rate recordings. , 1984, International journal of bio-medical computing.

[8]  H. V. van Geijn Developments in CTG analysis. , 1996, Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  D. Arduini,et al.  COMPUTERIZED ANALYSIS OF FETAL HEART RATE , 1994, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[10]  O. Shmueli,et al.  Interpretation of nonstress tests by an artificial neural network. , 1995, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[11]  S Cerutti,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic approach in the analysis of cardiovascular variability signals in normal and pathological subjects , 2000 .

[12]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[13]  A. Malliani,et al.  Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use , 1996 .

[14]  Georg Dorffner,et al.  Neural networks for recognizing patterns in cardiotocograms , 1998, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[15]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[16]  Giovanni Magenes,et al.  Detection of normal and pathological fetal states by means of neural and fuzzy classifiers applied to CTG parameters , 1999, Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference. 1999 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 21st Annual Conference and the 1999 Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (Cat. N.