Improving the ecological and economic performance of agri-environment schemes: Payment by modelled results versus payment for actions

[1]  S. Hüttel,et al.  Farmers' acceptance of results-based agri-environmental schemes: A German perspective , 2022, Land Use Policy.

[2]  Frans P. de Vries,et al.  Ecological and economic implications of alternative metrics in biodiversity offset markets , 2022, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[3]  Katsuya Tanaka,et al.  Farmers’ preferences toward an outcome‐based payment for ecosystem service scheme in Japan , 2022, Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[4]  B. Hasler,et al.  European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges , 2022, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[5]  R. Huber,et al.  Comparing effectiveness and return on investment of action‐ and results‐based agri‐environmental payments in S witzerland , 2021, American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

[6]  J. Mills,et al.  Developing payment-by-results approaches for agri-environment schemes: Experience from an arable trial in England , 2021 .

[7]  J. Martin-Ortega,et al.  Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How were are not yet “hitting the right keys” , 2021 .

[8]  Bartosz Bartkowski,et al.  Payments by modelled results: A novel design for agri-environmental schemes , 2021 .

[9]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  An economic evaluation framework for land‐use‐based conservation policy instruments in a changing climate , 2020, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[10]  M. Drechsler.  Ecological-Economic Modelling for Biodiversity Conservation , 2020 .

[11]  F. Moreira,et al.  Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges , 2020, People and nature.

[12]  Giacomo Aletti,et al.  Estimating the effects of agri-environmental measures using difference-in-difference coarsened exact matching , 2020 .

[13]  W. Heijman,et al.  Effects on participation and biodiversity of reforming the implementation of agri-environmental schemes in the Netherlands , 2019 .

[14]  René van Bavel,et al.  Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review , 2019, European Review of Agricultural Economics.

[15]  J. Pearce‐Higgins,et al.  One-third of English breeding bird species show evidence of population responses to climatic variables over 50 years , 2019, Bird Study.

[16]  N. Hanley,et al.  Performance of Agglomeration Bonuses in Conservation Auctions: Lessons from a Framed Field Experiment , 2019, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[17]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Effects of higher‐tier agri‐environment scheme on the abundance of priority farmland birds , 2018 .

[18]  Francesco Vanni,et al.  Time to look for evidence: Results-based approach to biodiversity conservation on farmland in Europe , 2018 .

[19]  J. Morris,et al.  The importance of landscape characteristics for the delivery of cultural ecosystem services. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  M. Stolze,et al.  Farmers’ perceptions, preferences, and propositions for result-oriented measures in mountain farming , 2018 .

[21]  M. Kaljonen,et al.  Probing the grounds: Developing a payment-by-results agri-environment scheme in Finland , 2017 .

[22]  Kasper Thorup,et al.  Population decline is linked to migration route in the Common Cuckoo , 2016, Nature Communications.

[23]  Stefanie Engel,et al.  The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services , 2016 .

[24]  D. Russi,et al.  Result-based agri-environment measures: Market-based instruments, incentives or rewards? The case of Baden-Württemberg , 2016 .

[25]  Tim G. Benton,et al.  Scaling up pro-environmental agricultural practice using agglomeration payments: Proof of concept from an agent-based model , 2016 .

[26]  N. Hanley,et al.  Should We Pay for Ecosystem Service Outputs, Inputs or Both? , 2016 .

[27]  A. Heissenhuber,et al.  Result-oriented approaches to the management of drinking water catchments in agricultural landscapes , 2016 .

[28]  L. Dobremez,et al.  “Flowering Meadows”, a result-oriented agri-environmental measure: Technical and value changes in favour of biodiversity , 2015 .

[29]  David Kleijn,et al.  The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  Katrin Prager,et al.  Agri-environmental collaboratives for landscape management in Europe , 2015 .

[31]  S. Cumming,et al.  Modeling distribution and abundance of multiple species: Different pooling strategies produce similar results , 2014 .

[32]  G. Murphy,et al.  An investigation into the type of farmer who chose to participate in Rural Environment Protection Scheme (REPS) and the role of institutional change in influencing scheme effectiveness , 2014 .

[33]  Nick Hanley,et al.  The Impact of Information Provision on Agglomeration Bonus Performance: An Experimental Study on Local Networks , 2014 .

[34]  P. Opdam,et al.  Resilience-based governance in rural landscapes: Experiments with agri-environment schemes using a spatially explicit agent-based model , 2013 .

[35]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change , 2013 .

[36]  Martin F. Quaas,et al.  Combining performance-based and action-based payments to provide environmental goods under uncertainty , 2013 .

[37]  Clara Tattoni,et al.  Can LiDAR data improve bird habitat suitability models , 2012 .

[38]  N. Hanley,et al.  The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[39]  L. Prokopy,et al.  Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  M. Tichit,et al.  Action versus Result-Oriented Schemes in a Grassland Agroecosystem: A Dynamic Modelling Approach , 2012, PloS one.

[41]  S. Newson,et al.  Modelling changes in species’ abundance in response to projected climate change , 2012 .

[42]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  Should payments for biodiversity conservation be based on action or results , 2011 .

[43]  N. Bunnefeld,et al.  Management strategy evaluation: a powerful tool for conservation? , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[45]  N. Hanley,et al.  100 years of change: examining agricultural trends, habitat change and stakeholder perceptions through the 20th century , 2009 .

[46]  Frank Wätzold,et al.  Spatially Uniform versus Spatially Heterogeneous Compensation Payments for Biodiversity-Enhancing Land-Use Measures , 2005 .

[47]  M. Araújo,et al.  Presence-absence versus presence-only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability , 2004 .

[48]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Practical Use of the Information-Theoretic Approach , 1998 .