Prognostic factors analysis for oral cavity cancer survival in the Netherlands and Taiwan using a privacy-preserving federated infrastructure

The difference in incidence of oral cavity cancer (OCC) between Taiwan and the Netherlands is striking. Different risk factors and treatment expertise may result in survival differences between the two countries. However due to regulatory restrictions, patient-level analyses of combined data from the Netherlands and Taiwan are infeasible. We implemented a software infrastructure for federated analyses on data from multiple organisations. We included 41,633‬ patients with single-tumour OCC between 2004 and 2016, undergoing surgery, from the Taiwan Cancer Registry and Netherlands Cancer Registry. Federated Cox Proportional Hazard was used to analyse associations between patient and tumour characteristics, country, treatment and hospital volume with survival. Five factors showed differential effects on survival of OCC patients in the Netherlands and Taiwan: age at diagnosis, stage, grade, treatment and hospital volume. The risk of death for OCC patients younger than 60 years, with advanced stage, higher grade or receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery was lower in the Netherlands than in Taiwan; but patients older than 70 years, with early stage, lower grade and receiving surgery alone in the Netherlands were at higher risk of death than those in Taiwan. The mortality risk of OCC in Taiwanese patients treated in hospitals with higher hospital volume (≥ 50 surgeries per year) was lower than in Dutch patients. We conducted analyses without exchanging patient-level information, overcoming barriers for sharing privacy sensitive information. The outcomes of patients treated in the Netherlands and Taiwan were slightly different after controlling for other prognostic factors.

[1]  P. Hart DOING BETTER, FEELING WORSE , 1990, The Lancet.

[2]  B. Vikram Adjuvant therapy in head and neck cancer , 1998, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  Herng‐Ching Lin,et al.  Effects of surgeon and hospital volume on 5-year survival rates following oral cancer resections: the experience of an Asian country. , 2008, Surgery.

[4]  Li‐yu Lee,et al.  Histological Differentiation of Primary Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas in an Area of Betel Quid Chewing Prevalence , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[5]  Katya Scheinberg,et al.  Introduction to derivative-free optimization , 2010, Math. Comput..

[6]  W. Chiang,et al.  Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of oral cancer associated with betel quid chewing and tobacco smoking in Taiwan. , 2010, Oral oncology.

[7]  S. Warnakulasuriya Living with oral cancer: epidemiology with particular reference to prevalence and life-style changes that influence survival. , 2010, Oral oncology.

[8]  F. Fang,et al.  Clinical, pathological and molecular determinants in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. , 2010, Future oncology.

[9]  G. Gatta,et al.  Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. , 2011, European journal of cancer.

[10]  Jihoon Kim,et al.  Grid Binary LOgistic REgression (GLORE): building shared models without sharing data , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[11]  Paul R. Burton,et al.  DataSHIELD - shared individual-level analysis without sharing the data: a biostatistical perspective. , 2012 .

[12]  Jihoon Kim,et al.  iDASH: integrating data for analysis, anonymization, and sharing , 2012, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  P. Chou,et al.  Multivariate Analyses to Assess the Effects of Surgeon and Hospital Volume on Cancer Survival Rates: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan , 2012, PloS one.

[14]  M. J. Carmen,et al.  A proposal on cancer data quality checks: one common procedure for European cancer registries , 2014 .

[15]  S. Roman,et al.  Trends and variations in the use of adjuvant therapy for patients with head and neck cancer , 2014, Cancer.

[16]  Xiaoqian Jiang,et al.  WebDISCO: a web service for distributed cox model learning without patient-level data sharing , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[17]  F. Berrino,et al.  Cancer survival in Europe, 1999-2007: Doing better, feeling worse? , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[18]  M. Lai,et al.  Quality assessment and improvement of nationwide cancer registration system in Taiwan: a review. , 2015, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[19]  C. Mathers,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[20]  G. Gatta,et al.  Prognoses and improvement for head and neck cancers diagnosed in Europe in early 2000s: The EUROCARE-5 population-based study. , 2015, European journal of cancer.

[21]  Max Welling,et al.  A note on privacy preserving iteratively reweighted least squares , 2016, ArXiv.

[22]  P. Lambin,et al.  Distributed learning: Developing a predictive model based on data from multiple hospitals without data leaving the hospital - A real life proof of concept. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  J. Roodenburg,et al.  Trends in oral cavity cancer incidence, mortality, survival and treatment in the Netherlands , 2016, International journal of cancer.

[24]  Siu Cheung Hui,et al.  Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms for Parametric Survival Analysis with Weibull Distribution , 2017, 2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS.

[25]  L. Smeele,et al.  Variation in head and neck cancer care in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort evaluation of incidence, treatment and outcome. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[26]  Blaise Agüera y Arcas,et al.  Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data , 2016, AISTATS.

[27]  Timo M. Deist,et al.  Infrastructure and distributed learning methodology for privacy-preserving multi-centric rapid learning health care: euroCAT , 2017, Clinical and translational radiation oncology.

[28]  Jun Li,et al.  POPCORN: A web service for individual PrognOsis prediction based on multi-center clinical data CollabORatioN without patient-level data sharing , 2018, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[29]  E. V. Veen Observational health research in Europe: understanding the General Data Protection Regulation and underlying debate. , 2018 .

[30]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  A generic framework for privacy preserving deep learning , 2018, ArXiv.

[31]  M. J. Carmen,et al.  A proposal on cancer data quality checks: one common procedure for European cancer registries (version 1.1) , 2018 .

[32]  J. Gigliotti,et al.  Delays in oral cavity cancer. , 2019, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[33]  A. Katsumata,et al.  Contrast-enhanced computed tomography image assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with oral cancer by using a deep learning system of artificial intelligence. , 2019, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[34]  Wen-Chung Lee,et al.  Taiwan's Nationwide Cancer Registry System of 40 years: Past, present, and future. , 2019, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[35]  A. Ramanathan,et al.  Survival of Oral Cancer Patients in Different Ethnicities , 2019, Cancer investigation.

[36]  B. Ilhan,et al.  Improving Oral Cancer Outcomes with Imaging and Artificial Intelligence , 2020, Journal of dental research.

[37]  Philippe Lambin,et al.  Systematic Review of Privacy-Preserving Distributed Machine Learning From Federated Databases in Health Care , 2020, JCO clinical cancer informatics.

[38]  G. Geleijnse,et al.  VANTAGE6: an open source priVAcy preserviNg federaTed leArninG infrastructurE for Secure Insight eXchange , 2020, AMIA.