General statistical framework for quantitative proteomics by stable isotope labeling.

The combination of stable isotope labeling (SIL) with mass spectrometry (MS) allows comparison of the abundance of thousands of proteins in complex mixtures. However, interpretation of the large data sets generated by these techniques remains a challenge because appropriate statistical standards are lacking. Here, we present a generally applicable model that accurately explains the behavior of data obtained using current SIL approaches, including (18)O, iTRAQ, and SILAC labeling, and different MS instruments. The model decomposes the total technical variance into the spectral, peptide, and protein variance components, and its general validity was demonstrated by confronting 48 experimental distributions against 18 different null hypotheses. In addition to its general applicability, the performance of the algorithm was at least similar than that of other existing methods. The model also provides a general framework to integrate quantitative and error information fully, allowing a comparative analysis of the results obtained from different SIL experiments. The model was applied to the global analysis of protein alterations induced by low H₂O₂ concentrations in yeast, demonstrating the increased statistical power that may be achieved by rigorous data integration. Our results highlight the importance of establishing an adequate and validated statistical framework for the analysis of high-throughput data.

[1]  Trong Khoa Pham,et al.  Technical, experimental, and biological variations in isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ). , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[3]  M. Mann,et al.  Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture, SILAC, as a Simple and Accurate Approach to Expression Proteomics* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[4]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  Statistical analysis of relative labeled mass spectrometry data from complex samples using ANOVA. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[5]  Ann L. Oberg,et al.  Statistical methods for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomic experiments with labeling , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  J. Redondo,et al.  Statistical Model to Analyze Quantitative Proteomics Data Obtained by 18O/16O Labeling and Linear Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[7]  Yi Zhang,et al.  A Robust Error Model for iTRAQ Quantification Reveals Divergent Signaling between Oncogenic FLT3 Mutants in Acute Myeloid Leukemia* , 2009, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  Is Proteomics the New Genomics? , 2007, Cell.

[9]  K. Parker,et al.  Multiplexed Protein Quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Using Amine-reactive Isobaric Tagging Reagents*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[10]  A. Ramos-Fernández,et al.  Quantitative proteomics using 16O/18O labeling and linear ion trap mass spectrometry , 2006, Proteomics.

[11]  Rune Matthiesen,et al.  Virtual Expert Mass Spectrometrist: iTRAQ tool for database‐dependent search, quantitation and result storage , 2010, Proteomics.

[12]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression , 2002, ISMB.

[13]  Salvador Martínez-Bartolomé,et al.  Properties of Average Score Distributions of SEQUEST , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  G. Bellí,et al.  Redox control and oxidative stress in yeast cells. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[15]  J. Redondo,et al.  Quantitative in-depth analysis of the dynamic secretome of activated Jurkat T-cells. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[16]  Gunther Schadow,et al.  Protein quantification in label-free LC-MS experiments. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[17]  M. Mann,et al.  A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) , 2006, Nature Protocols.

[18]  Olga Vitek,et al.  Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. , 2009, Journal of proteome research.

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[20]  N. Karp,et al.  Addressing Accuracy and Precision Issues in iTRAQ Quantitation* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[21]  Ingo Ruczinski,et al.  Statistical inference from multiple iTRAQ experiments without using common reference standards. , 2013, Journal of proteome research.

[22]  Albert Sickmann,et al.  Precise protein quantification based on peptide quantification using iTRAQ™ , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[23]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Protein Significance Analysis in Selected Reaction Monitoring (SRM) Measurements* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[24]  T. Therneau,et al.  A statistical model for iTRAQ data analysis. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[25]  J. Redondo,et al.  A Robust Method for Quantitative High-throughput Analysis of Proteomes by 18O Labeling* , 2011, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[26]  Terry M Therneau,et al.  Relative quantification: characterization of bias, variability and fold changes in mass spectrometry data from iTRAQ-labeled peptides. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[27]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Automated statistical analysis of protein abundance ratios from data generated by stable-isotope dilution and tandem mass spectrometry. , 2003, Analytical chemistry.

[28]  M. Arntzen,et al.  IsobariQ: software for isobaric quantitative proteomics using IPTL, iTRAQ, and TMT. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[29]  J. Buhler,et al.  The H2O2 Stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  P. Liao,et al.  Secretomic Analysis Identifies Alpha-1 Antitrypsin (A1AT) as a Required Protein in Cancer Cell Migration, Invasion, and Pericellular Fibronectin Assembly for Facilitating Lung Colonization of Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[31]  Enrique Herrero,et al.  Comprehensive Transcriptional Analysis of the Oxidative Response in Yeast* ♦ , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Johannes Griss,et al.  The Proteomics Identifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  Robust and Sensitive iTRAQ Quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  Jianhua Huang,et al.  A statistical framework for protein quantitation in bottom-up MS-based proteomics , 2009, Bioinform..

[35]  C. Bessant,et al.  i-Tracker: For quantitative proteomics using iTRAQ™ , 2005, BMC Genomics.

[36]  Wen-Lian Hsu,et al.  Multi-Q: a fully automated tool for multiplexed protein quantitation. , 2006, Journal of proteome research.

[37]  Navdeep Jaitly,et al.  DAnTE: a statistical tool for quantitative analysis of -omics data , 2008, Bioinform..

[38]  John R Yates,et al.  Mass spectrometry in high-throughput proteomics: ready for the big time , 2010, Nature Methods.

[39]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  A stress test for mass spectrometry–based proteomics , 2009, Nature Methods.

[40]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Xin Huang,et al.  UNiquant, a program for quantitative proteomics analysis using stable isotope labeling. , 2011, Journal of proteome research.

[42]  K. Anderson,et al.  Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies. , 2008, Journal of proteome research.

[43]  J. Bárcena,et al.  Shotgun redox proteomics identifies specifically modified cysteines in key metabolic enzymes under oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Journal of proteomics.

[44]  M. Mann,et al.  Quantitative Phosphoproteomics Applied to the Yeast Pheromone Signaling Pathway*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[45]  Daniel López-Ferrer,et al.  Improved Method for Differential Expression Proteomics Using Trypsin-catalyzed 18O Labeling with a Correction for Labeling Efficiency *S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[46]  Rod B. Watson,et al.  Quantitative Proteomic Analysis Using Isobaric Protein Tags Enables Rapid Comparison of Changes in Transcript and Protein Levels in Transformed Cells*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[47]  J. Vázquez,et al.  A Novel Strategy for Global Analysis of the Dynamic Thiol Redox Proteome* , 2012, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[48]  Xiangdong Wang,et al.  Cancer bioinformatics: A new approach to systems clinical medicine , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[49]  P. Roepstorff,et al.  Quantitation of peptides and proteins by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry using (18)O-labeled internal standards. , 2000, Rapid communications in mass spectrometry : RCM.