Most techniques for relating textual information rely on intellectually created links such as author-chosen keywords and titles, authority indexing terms, or bibliographic citations. Similarity of the semantic content of whole documents, rather than just titles, abstracts, or overlap of keywords, offers an attractive alternative. Latent semantic analysis provides an effective dimension reduction method for the purpose that reflects synonymy and the sense of arbitrary word combinations. However, latent semantic analysis correlations with human text-to-text similarity judgments are often empirically highest at ≈300 dimensions. Thus, two- or three-dimensional visualizations are severely limited in what they can show, and the first and/or second automatically discovered principal component, or any three such for that matter, rarely capture all of the relations that might be of interest. It is our conjecture that linguistic meaning is intrinsically and irreducibly very high dimensional. Thus, some method to explore a high dimensional similarity space is needed. But the 2.7 × 107 projections and infinite rotations of, for example, a 300-dimensional pattern are impossible to examine. We suggest, however, that the use of a high dimensional dynamic viewer with an effective projection pursuit routine and user control, coupled with the exquisite abilities of the human visual system to extract information about objects and from moving patterns, can often succeed in discovering multiple revealing views that are missed by current computational algorithms. We show some examples of the use of latent semantic analysis to support such visualizations and offer views on future needs.
[1]
T. Landauer,et al.
A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge.
,
1997
.
[2]
Peter W. Foltz,et al.
An introduction to latent semantic analysis
,
1998
.
[3]
Simon Dennis,et al.
An unsupervised method for the extraction of propositional information from text
,
2004,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[4]
T. Landauer,et al.
Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis
,
1990
.
[5]
Mark Steyvers,et al.
Finding scientific topics
,
2004,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[6]
J. Lafferty,et al.
Mixed-membership models of scientific publications
,
2004,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[7]
Jill Burstein,et al.
Automated Essay Scoring : A Cross-disciplinary Perspective
,
2003
.
[8]
Louis M. Gomez,et al.
Formative design evaluation of superbook
,
1989,
TOIS.