Which Reward Structure Works Best? A New Perspective on Cooperation and Competition in Teams

A contingency model of reward structures is developed, stating that the relationship between reward structure and team performance is contingent upon the performance dimension specified (speed vs. accuracy), team composition (team members' interpersonal orientation in terms of extroversion and agreeableness), and the relative performance level of individual team members. In a laboratory experiment, 75 four-person teams engaged in an interactive command and control task, in which reward structure (cooperative vs. competitive) was manipulated. Results showed that a competitive structure enhanced speed, whereas a cooperative structure enhanced accuracy. Moreover, teams high on extroversion and agreeableness performed better under a cooperative structure, whereas teams low on these orientations performed better under a competitive structure. Finally, reward structure had a stronger impact on poorer than on stronger performing team members.

[1]  Milton E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Group Productivity and Process: Pure and Mixed Reward Structures and Task Interdependence. , 1980 .

[2]  J. Shepperd,et al.  Individual Contributions to a Collective Effort , 1989 .

[3]  P. Costa,et al.  The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and the five-factor model. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. , 1982 .

[5]  M. Stanne,et al.  Does competition enhance or inhibit motor performance: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  Teams in Organizations , 1999 .

[8]  Robert L. Hamblin,et al.  Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. , 1963 .

[9]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. , 2002 .

[10]  William McDougall,et al.  OF THE WORDS CHARACTER AND PERSONALITY , 1932 .

[11]  W. Helsen,et al.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams : Much more than g , 1997 .

[13]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[14]  Jerald Greenberg,et al.  Using Punishment Threats to Attenuate Social Loafing Effects among Swimmers , 1993 .

[15]  Samuel Juni,et al.  Revised NEO personality inventory , 1995 .

[16]  J. Shaw,et al.  Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. , 1998 .

[17]  Charles C. Snow,et al.  Characteristics of Managerial Careers in the 21st century , 1996 .

[18]  Colin Camerer.  Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[19]  K. Williams,et al.  Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing , 1979 .

[20]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness. , 1998 .

[21]  A. V. Vianen.  PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: THE MATCH BETWEEN NEWCOMERS' AND RECRUITERS' PREFERENCES FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES , 2000 .

[22]  R. Caplan.  Person-environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms , 1987 .

[23]  R. Wageman.  Interdependence and Group Effectiveness , 1995 .

[24]  P. Muchinsky,et al.  What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit , 1987 .

[25]  P. Costa,et al.  Personality trait structure as a human universal. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[26]  Robert Sessions Woodworth,et al.  THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT , 1899 .

[27]  M. Deutsch.  A Theory of Co-operation and Competition , 1949 .

[28]  J. Hackman.  Why Teams Don’t Work , 1998 .

[29]  Amy L. Kristof.  PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONS , 1996 .

[30]  P. Costa,et al.  Normal Personality Assessment in Clinical Practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. , 1992 .